[If you sort the comments from oldest to newest, this will be at the bottom of page 11]
Noah's ark being on Mount Ararat is nothing new. There is that supposed top secret photo that the U.S. Government kept hidden of the ark being there, largely covered in ice and captured by a spy satellite camera. Moreover, other explorers over the years have claimed the same location of the ark. But this appears to be the first major and highly funded research project - outside any government - to finally disclose what many have known for a long time. As to The Great Flood being the result of divine intervention is concerned, I am not buying it. A much more likely scenario and one backed up by growing archeological evidence, is that the flood was caused by a holocaust stemming from an ancient nuclear war between the Anunnaki and the Atalans (Atlanteans). The latter lost due to the much more powerful antimatter weapons of the Anunnaki; causing not only The Great Flood, which is documented in various ancient cultures, but also worldwide earthquakes and the tilting of the planetary axis.
47 comments
Hey, one bizarre fantasy is as good as another. This is no less likely than the Biblical story.
Of course, it's no more sensible either.
@Dark_Lord_Prime
1.5 kg of the stuff alone would create a 64 megaton explosion.
Of course sane people know that any civilization that could produce that much antimatter would leave behind some pretty impressive ruins. And nobody has seen such ruins.
EDIT: And people have looked at the Ararat anomaly using satellites before, all they found were some big blocky rocks.
That was a WHOLE lot of conspiracy jibberish there pal..wow..I just live in boring old reality.
You live in exciting conspiracy land, where even your grandmother can be secretly working for the men in black.
And yet not a single one of the people saying they found the ark has had an archeology degree. Funny, that.
This is just pseudo-archeology garbage that can be disproven with about 5 minutes of Google research.
Oh dear! paulrichard, you forgot about the interdimensional Hyperanurarboreals. These are dimensionally unstable super tree-frogs, as they appear to us in our dimension, however, in their own dimension they appear as colossal, godlike figures of superhuman abilities and with super weaponry the likes of which are rarely seen on Earth. They are almost religiously cult-like figures in appearance and judging by their feats as well. Earth, by the way, appears in their dimension as a dessicated plum with a clown nose.
Anyway, the point is, the Hyperanurarboreals countered the antimatter weapons of the Anunnaki with their own far superior antidarkmatter bombs. This means that it is impossible for a world wide flood to have occurred at all and the seeming wreck on Mount Ararat is nothing more than the rotting outline of a Swiss Alpine mountain-boater's skiff gone astray, probably having been wind swept off the Matterhorn and coming to rest on Ararat. Possibly due to the Hyperanurarboreal's antidarkmatter bombs momentarily turning the Matterhorn into the Antimatterhorn.
I went to Armenia, where the purported mountain is, and they don't allow you to put a foot on there, let alone climb, because it's a kind of sacred mountain. Wonder where this boorish guy who probably has never moved his ass from the Bible Belt knows that.
One photo of Mt Ararat. No photoshopping, lotsa rocks, no Ark!
image
That took 20 seconds to find, isn't the internet wonderful?
So, these ancient fuckers had this amazing technology of nuclear power and antimatter weapons, yet lacked the ability to record any evidence of their scientific advances on any media from paper to computer chip.
Alrighty then.
A satellite photo of the supposed ark, even if such a photo exists, couldn't possibly establish the subject as being anything but a possible pile of some kind of stuff vaguely in the shape of what might have been a boat.
Great floods have occured in many places, many times, but a global flood is impossible.
You know, nuclear wars, worldwide floods, huge earth-shattering earthquakes and significant tilting of the planetary axis leave evidence behind. Geological evidence. Evidence that, if these globally significant events actually occurred, would have turned up by now.
And it's funny that, with all this mention ancient cultures make of floods, they never mention those blokes next door with the mushroom cloud getting reduced to atoms by the dastardly Anunnaki just before the mighty deluge.
So I guess the reason we have no evidence of all this supertechnology is that it was all destroyed...
.
.
.
.
...by antimatter.
But I'm sure there's also a distinct geological layer loaded with all the end products of fission. Oh wait, there's not.
A much more likely scenario and one backed up by growing archeological evidence, is that the flood was caused by a holocaust stemming from an ancient nuclear war between the Anunnaki and the Atalans (Atlanteans).
This "nuclear war causing a flood" hypothesis is actually less likely that the Biblical account of Noah's Ark. A nuclear exchange of that magnitude would produce enormous amounts of fallout and radiation, so much that it would be easily detectable.
5 days later, this man was sued for posting on the internet a story that turned out to be the intellectual property of Jerry Bruckheimer.
either that, or this man hasn't learned the important lesson that drugs and Roland Emmerich films dont mix. (i still luv ya movies Roland, even if their plotlines are utter bullshit. XD)
"A much more likely scenario and one backed up by growing archeological evidence, is that the flood was caused by a holocaust stemming from an ancient nuclear war between the Anunnaki and the Atalans (Atlanteans)."
You're right. That makes so much more sense.
"A much more likely scenario..."
Both seem about the same to me, but I'm not well versed in the crazy theory metric.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.