BREAKING:
30-year-old pro-life activist Lauren Handy has just been sentenced to 57 months in federal prison for handing roses and resources to women at an abortion facility,
Meanwhile, abortionists who dismember and kill children walk free.
A grave injustice!
1:00 AM · May 15, 2024 · 334.6K Views
1,720 Reposts 204 Quotes 5,536 Likes 158 Bookmarks
7 comments
Oh look,another fucking lie from the filthy mouth of a fucking liar.
Handy was convicted of leading an invasion and occupation of a clinic, which included injuring a nurse and preventing a woman having labor pains from being cared for. Plus conspiring to do the same at other clinics.
So much for your "Christian love."
And how convenient that you forgot about the five jarred fetuses found in this creeps house.
@Sasha #197189
To be fair, if they would be completely honest al the time, they wouldn’t be forced-birthers, would they? Same thing with 99% of the people quoted here; it takes a certain type of detachment from reality and facts to say the stuff quoted here.
@Timjer #197209
Tautological Templars: Their lies can’t be morally wrong because they see themselves as good people working to good ends. All reality must be centered around the conclusion that they are “good” people doing “good” things. So nothing they do can be bad. And their goal is to make more people like them, so any child born they have unrestricted influence over is worth any collateral damage along the way. Anything that impedes them is automatically and deliberately evil and therefore undermining them must be good starting from human rights to the discussion of where cognition, identity, and personhood begin, all the way down to punishing natural miscarriage and gaslighting women shaming them as “sluts” for sexual activity under ANY circumstances but ALSO if they do the opposite and flatly refuse to engage in the act of reproduction or enter a social contract/power structure that could be used to pressure them to do so. The views of the pro-choice and all rights that impede conversion of a child - those of the parents before conception with the “unborn” taking priority and those of the child after birth using the parents rights as a smokescreen flipping the unspoken heirarchy of rights upside down as is convenient - must be contested at every turn even if it requires deceit not because they are untrue or invalid, but because they are inconvenient to “good” goals.
A child they conclude they will not have influence over, however, can rot for all they care unless they’re useful as a narrative or emotional cudgel because they will never be “good” people according to their tautology.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.