[Experiment] Anthropology as it relates to Inceldom

Internet incels are really just amateur anthropologists studying the mating behavior of Staceys and Chads in western civilization. It all came to me when I read the official male racial hierarchy post by @RageAgainstTDL and felt sorry for aboriginals, which made me have a deep dive into the vast spectrum of furtive cultures and civilizations bound to evaporate simply due to their lack of physical beauty. It ignited a sincere curiosity of anthropology as a whole within me, as I want to learn about mate selection, meanings of social capital, and perceptions of gender as broadly as possible outside the oppressive realm of western civilization.

Indigenous tribes fascinate me for several reasons. For one, they are genetic trash like me, so I have a natural curiosity as to what makes genetically ugly people successful in mating and happiness. My own general hunch as to why indigenous people bred themselves to be ugly is simply that their imagination has been exercised so well that beauty generally is not that important. It just seems like if you live in a culture with no technology whatsoever, your imagination and the sense of belonging you have within the universe, let alone your small tribe is greatly expanded. This imagination gives rise to local rhythms, art, concepts, Gods, beliefs. Imagined things, right or wrong, are at least things the individual has ownership of. There is a lack of competitiveness to it all that I like: it's not about the historical importance of your creations, it's about the contribution of it. You imagine elaborate reasons as to why it's the 80 year old grandmother that's the hottest bitch in the tribe.

Yes, there are insane leaps in moral relativism as it pertains to indigenous tribes, and it's weird how we give them a pass. It's understandable: if you are set to one moral standard your whole life, it requires a lot of education on other cultures to bring you into that viewpoint. It's weird how we don't apply this moral relativistic pass within our culture, simply because we assume we are a lot more in sync with normiehood than we really are. It also makes you rethink the entire concept of abuse in uncomfortable ways.

I think the big sticking point is that if you don't have written laws, taxes, and a police state, generally, people become more in sync with their communities, and thus things work out morally more often within the confines of these communities. To use corporate cringe jargon, tribesmen inherently live with intrinsic motivation to serve to their communities, because it's easy to feel a sense of importance within a small tribe. In the west, especially incels, understand deeply, our insignificance: that the machine lives easily without us, that our contributions are meager taxes enforced by the threat of prison rape.

A theme of ugly tribes: so long as your tribe is harmless (or is harmful in a self-contained way), ugly, and allow your resources to be taken, the white man generally lets you do whatever you want. It's not "multiculturalism" if you aren't even a party with legal representation within the state. When indigenous peoples have hot enough chicks, suddenly the white man goes "HOW DARE THAT SAVAGE WALK AROUND NAKED." They begin to heap moral excuses to kill the ethnic men, and take the ethnic women as booty for the lesser whites.

As far as I'm concerned, morality within the broad swathe of civilizations and cultures throughout history is so varied there simply cannot be good or evil. The mutant Apocalypse is right. The strong shall survive and the weak shall perish.