Liberals are some of the worse racist I know. Look at the way they scream about how racist the legal system is and yet advocate the murder of blacks through abortion at three times the rate of whites and other races at twice the rate. Then we have the current invasion from Mexico where liberals obviously are showing favoritism toward Hispanics in general and Mexicans in particular. The only reason I can think of them doing that is that they want to lure the Hispanics out of countries known to be pro life so that they can kill off their children through abortion.
30 comments
Right, we're "racist" because we allow women to decide what to do with their own bodies.
We've already given out the Lying for Jesus, but he's claiming liberals force blacks and Hispanics to get abortions; we haven't given out "Alternate Bizarro Universe" yet.
*yet advocate the murder of blacks through abortion at three times the rate of whites and other races at twice the rate.
There's a tiny ring of truth here, but once again this particular fundie well overstates it. Margaret Sanger, who had a hand in starting the modern-day birth control and abortion centers, was a proponent of eugenics.
I dont understand the fundy definition of liberal. Surely liberal means fairly relaxed, let people get on with their own lives as long as it doesn't seriously affect others. How did it mutate to communist, Nazi, baby eating, racist, gay, feminist?
The only reason I can think of them doing that is
Stop right there! Please complete your courses in the Reeducation Camp before you attempt higher level thought processes! Back in line! Git !
Do these people not realize that most, if not all people who are pro-choice wouldn't mind one bit if we as a society managed to drop the abortion rate to zero, as long as it was through education about contraceptives and other alternatives instead of legislating it out of existence?
Skyfire: "Margaret Sanger, who had a hand in starting the modern-day birth control and abortion centers, was a proponent of eugenics"
does this come from the "Darwin married his cousin" school of argument?
I am reminded of this
image
"Then we have the current invasion from Mexico".
Oh yes, I almost forgot about that. These people need a dictionary. Immigration =/= invasion. Immigrants are not trying to seize territorry by force like Hitler did with Poland. They're sneaking into the U.S. to try to have a better life like any other immigrant (illegal or not) does. I don't see bombs falling on San Diego, ships landing in San Francisco and tanks in El Paso so your argument is invalid.
@ TDR:
Sanger believed in eugenics- it was a very popular idea at the time, and I'd be more surprised if someone advocating for reproductive rights at that time wasn't into eugenics. She mostly seemed to believe that the physically and mentally ill shouldn't reproduce, and the often-quoted letter concerning blacks is actually a small snippet: the actual quote in its entirety says that there are people who will spread the rumor that contraceptives are a conspiracy to wipe out black people, rather than a way of improving their lives by allowing them to have a manageable number of children (just like everyone else).
Nobody is advocating abortion, any more than they advocate appendix removal. Abortion is sometimes the lesser of two evils, that is all.
Aren't most people in Mexico Mexicans?
The US legal system is murdering blacks through the death penalty at a higher rate than whites and other races too.
I think it's more "pro-life" to make sure that the children who are born are really wanted and taken care of.
No one is being forced to get abortions (you do recall the word "choice" don't you?) If you want to talk about racial inequality in killings, lets discuss that conservative darling: capital punishment!
Invasion of Mexico? The only invasions I recall were the ones prompted by Bush. WMD's, remember those? Boy, I'd bet your lot would really feel stupid if your memories stretched that far back.
And, for the record, children and pregnant women were killed in those invasions. How come there were no tears shed over them on your side? Aren't you "pro-life" or do the children of Iraq and Afghanistan not count?
Are you of 100% Indigenous American (Indian) ancestry, Kerwin...?
...what's that, you say? You're not ? Well then...:
image
Your argument is invalid.
Dumbya's own imperialist adventurism. Iraq. Afghanistan. Your argument is invalid II.
Also, the Bible states that a person isn't classified a living human until 40 days post-birth. Your argument - and your entire 'Pro-Life ' cause - is invalid III.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.