Luke Howard #fundie #pratt

Luke Howard #fundie #pratt youtube.com

true but at the same time the bible makes more sense if you look at how life is. The scientists wanna always shove evolution down your throat even though biologically human are closer to a pig's anatomy than they are a chimps anatomy. There is no common ancestor between chimps and humans. That is my take but I agree with what you said in this life we will never know 100% if evolution is real or not simply because we have to interpret data from the past and considering how time works we won't ever be able to go back to the past. (Well maybe in back to the future but you know what I mean lol)

6 comments

The scientists wanna always shove evolution down your throat even though biologically human are closer to a pig's anatomy than they are a chimps anatomy. There is no common ancestor between chimps and humans.

Right. And pigs are so similar because they're actually humans who've been cursed by a witch. That's why the Bible forbids you from eating them. Pig farms are a coverup to hide the truth.

Those who knew more than you tried with a better argument: even with backup by a Professor of Biochemistry.

Gee: I wonder why nobody else has tried to prove we Atheists wrong in a court of law 16 years after Kitzmiller vs. Dover, eh OP...?!

...least of all you. Just the facts, ma'am. [/"Dragnet"]

That is my take

lol

'Opinions' not allowed.

That’s nice, mate. Now get those simian digits of yours busy on your device, again, trying to prove this.

Pigs are like humans in that they are omnivorous mammals (something very unspecific!) and have similar meat (which follows from the previous point), are social and relatively intelligent… and I think that’s it. I assume you also include that many domestic breeds have sparse fur and/or pinkish-beige skin similar to humans from Northern European, but this is not so applicable for the wild boar, other suids and even many other domestic breeds, including old ones that used to be much more common.
Meanwhile, there are many rather drastic differences between humans and pigs - for the most obvious, humans are plantigrade bipeds with five nail-bearing digits on both hand and feet, including the inner digit being specialised, whereas pigs are ungulate quadrupeds with symmetrical four-toed feets, walking on the inner pair of hooves while the outer toes are vestigal.

On the other hand, humans blatantly are apes. They look almost exactly like the other apes and especially chimpanzees and bonobos, just with modified spine, hips and feet as specialisations for obligatory upright walking (something all apes are capable of and use under certain circumstances; note also the similarities to knuckle-walking and in sitting posture) - of note, the big toe is a vestigal thumb, lacking the mobility but still rataining the distinctiveness compared to the other digits and reduced fur.

The only thing I can parse this as is as a reference to animal testing. The main reason that pigs are used in animal testing is that they have enough similarities to humans to be useful, but are super easy to obtain because you can literally buy them from a farm.

@Mathius_dragoon #78650
Nevermind that primates are used for animal testing as well.

Luke Howard #fundie #pratt youtube.com

6 comments

Confused?