I have went searching for my answer and I figured I should post it. Firstly no, it isnt possible for a human to become pregnant with an animals child. The reason I say no, is because womens eggs are different than other species, and so the semen from an animal will not enter a womans eggs. This, I have found out, really aggravates some women who are just way into beastiality. The many women who would "love to" have there animals child are plentiful, and a many would just "love to" have the chance to do so. I have even encountered some women (on the net) who have considered going to a veternarian and asking that thier eggs be replaced by a b---- eggs or another female animals eggs, just so they can have half-human half-animal babies. Cloning animals is bad. Cloning babies and having them artificially inseminated is worse. Having hybrid animal-humans out in this world is by far the most inhumane and unmoral thing I have ever heard of. What is wrong with people?
68 comments
I have went searching for my answer and I figured I should post it. Firstly no, it isnt possible for a human to become pregnant with an animals child. The reason I say no, is because womens eggs are different than other species, and so the semen from an animal will not enter a womans eggs.
How much research did he need to do to figure this one out? I mean, seriously.
The scary thing being that, regardless of fundie-ness, this guy's right... there are indeed people so far into that particular branch of fetishism that they WOULD want to give birth to human-animal hybrids.
And if you don't believe it, you need to hang out in seedier circles of the net.
Regardless, this isn't really fundie material, as that reaction is likely to be shared by many people.
Anonymus, I guess you might want to go to Somethingawful and look for Weekend Web or the very funny Second Life Safari. There you will find compiled data of all kinds of sick fetishes, like the vores, people that are turned by the thought of being digested by some animal or even dragon.
If the name of the women he means are animalchick200 or teddybear13, and they meet on internet, I can guess this guy is either making fun of the forum or those women(and I think that some can be men)are just laughing at these behind the screen.
methinks that StardustDragonfly was caught looking at bestiality on the web, and had to defend it by saying it was research.
Later on, SD says:
"These women I spoke with arent in Ohio, as far as I know, it was on the internet. I wanted to know exactly how far a woman would go with beastiality. Im not the kind of person that takes pleasure in animals. They are pets, and forces of nature, made by God. I would not go so low as to actually defile and immoralize myself by being with another species of animal, we are animal enough. The reason I wanted to know is because if there is a thought then eventually there will be a product. That is why there is so much beastiality pornography, and child pornography. Not that any porn is good, but those two are the worst."
...definitely gets their kicks from looking at animal-porn.
;-)
I have went searching for my answer and I figured I should post it.
Did you, now? Oh, by the way, it's "gone", not "went".
Firstly no, it isnt possible for a human to become pregnant with an animals child. The reason I say no, is because womens eggs are different than other species, and so the semen from an animal will not enter a womans eggs.
image
This, I have found out, really aggravates some women who are just way into beastiality. The many women who would "love to" have there animals child are plentiful, and a many would just "love to" have the chance to do so. I have even encountered some women (on the net) who have considered going to a veternarian and asking that thier eggs be replaced by a b---- eggs or another female animals eggs, just so they can have half-human half-animal babies.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! image
I know that there are many weird, outlandish or downright physically impossible fetishes on the Net (animal impregnation being in the latter category), but most of the adepts of said fetishes manage to understand the difference between fantasies and what reality allows, something you obviously have difficulties with. The "women" you encountered were most likely pulling your leg... (fun fact: 2/3 of people into bestiality are male ) Besides, even if they were serious, it's not like they're hurting anyone, except perhaps themselves.
Cloning animals is bad.
Why?
Cloning babies and having them artificially inseminated is worse.
You do know that there hasn't been any human cloning to this day, don't you? And that there are laws that seriously limit how far scientists can go into that domain? I suspect your understanding of in vitro fertilization is even more flawed than your English. In any case, this sentence sounds like the babies are impregnated... Even you realize that babies can't get pregnant, don't you?
Having hybrid animal-humans out in this world is by far the most inhumane and unmoral thing I have ever heard of. What is wrong with people?
Heretic! Catgirls FTW!!! Of course, creating true kemonomimi would require genetic engineering, since interspecies breeding is simply impossible.
I actually know someone (female, too) who's into bestiality--even she agrees this is bullshit (not that it didn't seem so already).
I mean, isn't one of the perks of bestiality that a girl can get fucked all she wants without having to worry about pregnancy (or STDs, for that matter)? XD
The scary thing being that, regardless of fundie-ness, this guy's right... there are indeed people so far into that particular branch of fetishism that they WOULD want to give birth to human-animal hybrids.
You see, this is why I said that no sane person wants to do this, and I can assure you that a furry who wants to make a human-animal hybrid so that he can fuck it is not sane.
Do you think perhaps s/he's heard of this and got completely the wrong end of the stick?
Ban lifted to allow animal-human embryos
By PA
Published: 17 May 2007
A major shift of position by ministers today cleared the way for scientists to create hybrid animal-human embryos for stem cell research.
The move followed a White Paper proposal banning the hybrids that attracted criticism from scientists, charities, patient groups and MPs.
Today the Government published a draft Bill that effectively sweeps away the ban. Under the Human Tissue and Embryos Bill, scientists will be allowed to produce "cytoplasmic" hybrid embryos that are 99.9% human and 0.1% animal.
The Bill goes further and permits human embryos to be altered by the introduction of animal DNA.
Health Minister Caroline Flint, the Bill's chief architect, denies that the Government had staged a climbdown.
She said that while recommending a "general prohibition", the White Paper had always left the door open for specific research to be allowed on a case-by-case basis.
But the immediate ban called for by the White Paper has now been removed.
The Bill also allows human-animal chimeras - human embryos that have been physically mixed with one or more animal cells.
True animal-animal hybrids, creatures "bred" by the fusion of sperm and eggs, remain outlawed.
In all cases it would be illegal to allow embryos to grow for more than 14 days or be implanted into a womb.
Technically, the Bill faces a further hurdle in the form of a pre-legislative scrutiny committee before being finalised. However, this is mainly to resolve technical issues and is not likely to result in any significant changes.
Cytoplasmic embryos made using eggs from rabbits or cows and genetic material from human donors could provide scientists with a plentiful supply of stem cells for research into diseases and new treatments.
Two teams of British scientists from London and Newcastle have already sought permission to create animal-human hybrids for this purpose.
Amid the controversy, their application has been put on hold by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority which regulates embryo research.
Speaking at a briefing at the Department of Health in London, Ms Flint said the debate had moved on in the last few months, making the scientific issues clearer.
She said: "I honestly don't see this as a back flip... it was an evaluation of a number of different view points.
"Our position was not to stop this research but to be clear that it's sensitive research, and we have to be sure about what we're going to permit to happen in the future.
"The position was a general prohibition, but with the opportunity on a case-by-case basis for certain types of research to take place".
(From here )
Or am I giving the silly little twit too much credit?
The closest I've found about this absurd conumdrum is that some scientists are trying to get hybrids from certain animals close to us genetically matching a human egg and an animal spermatozoid for therapeutical reasons. They want to see how the body works, specially the inmunitary system, among other things. Of course, it has nothing to do with bestiality(they usually get them through donnors)
By the sound of it, you're probably very conservative.
So how on earth do you get in touch with these people????
I say you're full of crap.
omg i wanted to post a question similar to this, a few days ago, a m8 of mine sent me a link of a beastiality website 4 a joke, it was so nasty nd i noticed dat most of the people in da vids are women and mabe 2 or 3 guys, this has really made my head messed up cos now i can neva go out wit a woman that either owns a dog or a horse, des alot of women wit very NASTY taboo fantasies out der. i use to fink people wh did fing like dat were lonely people who prob were sick nd tired of trying to find love or smfin so 1day dey jus got da idea of gettin fuckd or fuckin an animal, but wat shocked me was how stunnin some of this women are, its really messed up wat some people does behind closed doors
Illiteracy is (usually) a fixable problem, dearie. Writing this appallingly bad will make those of us who love the English language cringe, and only see your spelling and grammatical errors, not the message you want to spread.
Oh, your message is appallingly bad too...
You must have strange friends, if they are so into bestiality that they become aggravated by facts of biology.
I'm a woman, and have been for almost 50 years. I don't think I've EVER met a woman who wants to have "there animals child".
Erm, as you said, the human egg is different than other species' egg. You can't implant a non-human egg in a human uterus (to my knowledge) as the human uterine wall will not accept a non-human egg. It's hard enough getting a human egg to attach to that wall.
What's wrong with the people you know is that they all seem insane. You ought to get more normal friends.
Are you perhaps living in an insane-asylum?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.