The Liberal mind has the moral world upside down. It thinks God/Reality should bow and justify to it, rather than it to God/Reality. It thinks by collectivizing that it can force such bowing. But all it accomplishes is to make itself morally irrelevant, by surrendering its conscience, responsibility, and children to a false collective. It believes it has entitlement without responsibility, charity without sacrifice, and morality without limit. What it actually has is dehumanization. We are living in an age of moral zombies who celebrate zombiehood. There is no co-existence. There will prevail, one or the other.
Liberalism truly is a mental disorder....there is no other explanation (except spiritual). We don't need to over analyze it. When truth, facts, reason, logic and historic precedent fall on deaf ears you have psychosis on your hands.
A Democrat is the only animal (yes animal) that can kill a baby and say, “God bless you and God bless the United States.”
25 comments
(OP)
"A Democrat is the only animal (yes animal) that can kill a baby and say, 'God bless you and God bless the United States.'"
*quizical head tilt* What baby, and what god?
Also, all humans are animals, not just ones with political views you don't like.
"When truth, facts, reason, logic and historic precedent fall on deaf ears you have psychosis on your hands."
And we have psychosis on parade on this very website where we can point and laugh.
"A Democrat is the only animal (yes animal) that can kill a baby and say, “God bless you and God bless the United States.”"
image
Liberal mind? What is a liberal mind? I would be considered a raging liberal in America, while I am seen as rather conservative in Europe.
False analogy in the first sentence: god does not equal reality. If anything, for those you would called liberals, reality trumps god any time of the day.
I do not kill babies and I do not know anybody who kills babies. Two points:
1) an embryo or foetus is not a baby, just as a caterpillar is not butterfly.
2) Jeb Bush said he would kill an infant Hitler. Now who is ready to kill babies, again? An infant Hitler is not guilty of the crime an adult Hitler committed. Who was talking about responsibility, again?
Edited to correct mistake on the author of the Hitler sentence. Thanks to Da Rat Bastid.
And I would like to point out that when time-travelling, you never know if you are in your own timeline. So, I would abstain from interference, in any case.
There is no co-existence. There will prevail, one or the other.
And this is why fundamentalist conservatism is failing. Their total intolerance of anyone who doesn't agree with them is making them become marginalized. I mean, how many times can we hear about a War on X before we just want to tell you to STFU? And with your insistence on "my way or the highway" makes everyone choose the highway.
(Indicible)
"2) Trump said he would kill an infant Hitler."
No, that was Jeb Bush.
"An infant Hitler is not guilty of the crime an adult Hitler committed."
I wouldn't kill a young Hitler, not for the reasons you mentioned (after all, we live in a timeline where he will , not might, grow up to become history's most infamous tyrant to date, if left alone), but because I have no way of: A) determining whether ours is the only timeline in existence; or B) if not, scanning alternate timelines to determine the likely consequences of this hypothetical assassination. This is not something into which one can afford to charge blindly.
The Religious Fundamentalist mind has the moral world upside down. It thinks Reality should bow and justify to its God, rather than it to Reality.
It thinks by collectivizing that it can force such bowing. But all it accomplishes is to make itself morally irrelevant, by surrendering its conscience, responsibility, and children to a false collective.
It believes it has entitlement without responsibility, charity without sacrifice, and morality without limit. What it actually has is dehumanization.
We are living in an age of moral zombies who celebrate zombiehood. There is no co-existence. There will prevail, one or the other.
Fundamentalism truly is a mental disorder....there is no other explanation (except psychological).
We don't need to overanalyze it. When truth, facts, reason, logic and historic precedent fall on deaf ears you have psychosis on your hands.
A Fundie is the only animal (yes animal) that can call a month-old embryo a baby and say, “God bless you and God bless the United States.”
The Liberal mind has the moral world upside down. It thinks God/Reality should bow and justify to it, rather than it to God/Reality.
Conservatives, on the other hand, expect God/Reality to bow to them when it comes to the Biblical commands to give charity to the extent of the coat of your back to someone who needs it, to pay your workers a fair and living wage, to care for the stranger with different beliefs as you would your own brother, to judge fairly and equably; to care for the earth; to refrain from bearing a grudge, to refrain from speaking derogatorily of others, not to oppress the weak, not to take revenge, not to commit injustice, not to steal property, not to withhold wages, not to covet the property of others....
A Democrat is the only animal (yes animal) that can kill a baby and say, “God bless you and God bless the United States.”
Many Republicans have done just that on the conditions that 1) the baby is born; and 2) the baby is foreign.
A Democrat is the only animal (yes animal) that can kill a baby and say, "God bless you and God bless the United States"
Umm....we are ALL animals and it's zygotes that get aborted, not babies.
Co-existence will save us and imposing hierarchy and privilege is what causes wars and strife to begin with.
Whenever you like it or not....WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER!
SO TAKE YOUR DOMINATION FETISH AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR BAZOOKA!
@Da Rat Bastid
I wouldn't kill a young Hitler ... because I have no way of: A) determining whether ours is the only timeline in existence; or B) if not, scanning alternate timelines to determine the likely consequences of this hypothetical assassination.
Exactly. And what's with all this kill talk anyway by Jeb Bush? If you could go back in time to meet a young Hitler, why couldn't you just try to convince him not to be a genocidal maniac? Maybe show him that Jewish people aren't bad? Maybe teach him how to paint?
Future genocidal monster or not....
image
....if your first reaction to this is "KILL IT!", you have some serious issues.
How about giving baby Adolf to a family that won't abuse him and raise him to value kindness and compassion while helping him in his art career?
>There is no co-existence. There will prevail, one or the other.
And you and yours are the ones going extinct. Bye chief! Say hi to the trilobites for me.
(Doubting Thomas)
"If you could go back in time to meet a young Hitler, why couldn't you just try to convince him not to be a genocidal maniac? Maybe show him that Jewish people aren't bad?"
Because I'm not a psychologist, that's why not.
Besides, since we're dealing with a time-travel scenario (and knowing my luck), any effort I make to (giggles as he tries to say this with a straight face) "convince him not to be a genocidal maniac" would only turn out to be the catalyst that drives him down that very path.
On the other hand, I know he won't turn out that way if he's dead.
The "would you kill infant Hitler" thing reminds me of that episode of Family Guy....Stewie and Brian traveled back in time and somehow stopped 9/11, then came back to the present, which was then MUCH WORSE, because George W Bush lost the '04 election, and then created a new Confederacy...
Maybe Jeb should watch that one!
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.