When a black man commits a crime, ALL blacks must take responsibility for it. When a black man is on welfare ALL blacks must be shamed for the debt to white society. When a black man has a job, ALL blacks must be treated as usurpers because that job could have belonged to a white man. When a black man begins and ends his life in a ghetto with no work, no income, no education, no means to leave for greener pastures as even public transportation is cut off, no hope by design and if he ever dares venture out risks being shot dead in the street because he “doesn’t belong” out f the ghetto? That is the fault of all black people. No white man shall bear the sin even if they are personally responsible for defunding schools, for putting a halt to roadwork, for legitimizing redlining so that there can be no self-employment, for adding a surcharge to basic utilities, for pulling out a gun and ending the life of someone who had the cheek to believe they had legal rights and walked on the same street as them. Because they “could” have been up to anything. Just “feelings” are enough to justify killing. Your rights negate the rights of others. If a judge must selectively apply laws or tell a jury to ignore them entirely to let you paint yourself the victim they will oblige.
When a group of terrorists attacked America, their common religion meant ALL of its adherents must pay. ALL Muslims had to be ejected from the country. ALL Muslims had to be put on watchlists. ALL Muslims, everywhere across the world were THE ENEMY TO BE KILLED, TORTURED, TO BE HUNTED AND TO HAVE THEIR HISTORY DESTROYED FOR THE INSULT! THEY SHOULD BE FORCED TO TEACH THEIR CHILDREN THAT IT IS WRONG TO BE MUSLIM, THAT THEY WERE BORN CRIMINALS, THAT THEY OWE CHRISTIANS FOR THEIR CRIMES AS WILL THEIR CHILDREN AFTER THEM IF THEY ARE ALLOWED TO LIVE. But no Christian bears the sin of torture, or murder, or conversion by the sword. To even suggest that Christians show solidarity with the law and condemn those who burn down a Mosque - not take a shared responsibility of guilt but to simply state it wrong - is an insult. To suggest that Christianity should not be imposed as law or take precedence over individual rights or be taught as fact and made a requirement of education or any of the fears associated with Sharia? An attack. One that must be repaid to all Christians by the “attacker” losing their rights and whatever they believe becoming suspect. Your “rights” negate the rights of others regardless of what the law says. It only applies as you see fit.
How is your little white five year old any different from the little black five year olds that are killed? Other than the fact the white kid’s killer will be punished instead of having a gaggle of defenders saying the little boy shouldn’t have been trespassing and his shitty parents should have been keeping an eye on him and that the five year old could have been up to anything and wouldn’t have been killed if he showed the proper respect to the owner of the house, and really he should have done so much to make himself appear less threatening once he was caught “prowling” on the property. What? You expect a man to wait for a signed permission slip from the council of political correctness to be able to protect his property from some dangerous scumbag coming at him? And what was that little thug doing on someone else’s property if not getting a head start on a life of crime with some breaking and entering, followed by God-knows-what-else that it is perfectly acceptable not just to assume but state like it’s fact?
But there’s none of that. Just you holding all blacks collectively responsible and telling everyone else to get over the dead five year olds who aren’t white because they will always have had it coming.
This doublethink has crushed me. I think I need a break.