For anyone not used to the arguments of pro-AI degens, this is PRATT-ception: the entire post is “dUhH yEr A lUdDiTe!” but it also contains “bUt It’S jUsT lIkE pHoToGrApHy!” inside of the luddite BS.
Speaking of which, the first part of this image and its description are for sure BS. There were other forms of “permanent memory” of someone other than a photograph even back then.
I’m not at all a movie guy so I have no idea if anything they say about CGI is true, but judging by the truthfulness of the rest of the post it’s probably a lie.
The first part of the final one is true, some people are fooled by an AI video then realize and call it by its right name. But then there is some incoherent nonsense about “social brands”.
Then the last part makes absolutely no sense. None of the fake ideologies they present here nor the real opinions on AI require you to “bully your own empathy”, whateveer that means.
…wait was this whole description also just written by AI?