The thread title is an oxymoron. Christianity and politics are the same thing - not different things, as the thread tile implies.
I.e. Christians are obligated to oppose evil, and one cannot oppose evil without at the same time clashing with evildoers who promote a political agenda about indulging in evil.
Please pay special attention to my OP in the thread "Farewell to the darwinists!" since I won't be able directly to guide with you my wisdom soon because the board Apocalypse is nigh. So I leave that thread's OP with you as the perfect tome of future guidance for the entire rest of your life. And that goes for the other darwinists too. You and/or them can thank me when we meet in Heaven - that's if you and them take the advice in my perfect tome of wisdom. If not, I'll be in Heaven and the rest of you never will be.
I cannot fathom why darwinists like yourself are fascinated by plain-as-day, self-evident, blatantly obvious, common knowledge truth. My statement about being God's #1 Spokesman is as obvious as statements like "the grass is green." It is so obvious that it goes without saying.
The same is also true for my statements about God's Holy, Righteous Penis. That too is plain-as-day, self-evident, blatantly obvious, common knowledge truth. Yet darwinists treat me like I'm a genius since they believe I'm the first one who ever discovered it. It has been known since the dawn of mankind, starting with Adam & Eve! One time a crazy darwinist even falsely accused me of "plagiarizing him" on the false grounds that he "invented" the common knowledge of God's Holy, Righteous Penis. If anything, he plagiarized me because he learned about God's Holy Righteous Penis for the first time from my public posts about It on this board...except that you can't really plagiarize common knowledge like that nut falsely claimed I did to him. What a liar! What a kook! . . .
if I had to make a name for myself, then I am the God's Front of Holy Righteousness And Annihilator of Evil.
In recent months, Liberty University has endorsed Trump. That made me lose some respect for Liberty University. They should be able easily to discern that Trump is an liberal/evil man who does not believe in Christian/normal-non-psychopathic person values like preventing the murders of unborn babies.
I am disappointed that LU has made such a grievous moral error.
That's highly debatable. paganism is just an offshoot of satanism (satan is the head false god demon who runs both of those religions) so I'll use the word "paganism" simultaneously to describe both.
paganism was very dominant for an extremely long time. It had a decline for a few centuries, but then it came back in the 1800's in the form of darwinism, and darwinism (thus paganism) now dominates society with its evil iron fist.
Your definitions of "species" are completely arbitrary.
And moreover, they don't work either. I.e., darwinists claim that different species can't interbreed, even though species that aren't "supposed" to be able to interbreed can do so, and even though darwinists also paradoxically, at the same time, INSANELY, make an antithetical claim that debunks their very own other claim, that different species can interbreed!
To wit,
New Skull Could Be from Human Group that Interbred with Neandertals
What?! So your definition of species is based on the fact that they can't interbreed with one another, except for when they can?!?!?!?!?!??!?!!? truthy, can I get an AMEN (or at least a HEEHARHAWWWW or something???) for how LUDICROUS darwinists' insane & non-functional definition" of species is?!?!??!?!?!?!
darwinists call something a "different species" or not based on subjective opinion-based judgements.
What you call "speciation" is, in actuality, merely variation within a single kind of life. It is not, as your evolution story requires, evidence of lower forms of life transforming into new, higher forms of life.
Now, let's pretend for a moment that I didn't have any of the evidence which I just used to destroy your "specieation" argument (that evidence, by the way, is just one drop in the bucket)...
Even if darwinists did legitimately observe some "specieation"...that would still be grossly insufficient to prove their outlandish claims. darwinists claim that bacteria "descended" into all forms of life. So unless/until they observe every single one of those alleged transformations of "specieation," then their extraordinary claim of "common descent of all life forms from bacteria" will remain the unproven faith-based belief that it has always been.
And not surprisingly, atheists/darwinists/liberals advocate for exactly that. They encourage people to smoke crack and heroin and meth and everything else that will ruin their bodies & their lives and kill them. And they want the state to pay for running houses in which people ruin themselves in those ways! They call them things like "injection sites" but an accurate name would be "Abomination of Hell sites."
All of which just goes to show yet again that without God, humans become unimaginably evil.
Hating God is the only possible reason you could have to deny His Maleness and His Penis, slander him by calling Him a he/she, and attack His foremost representatives on the earth (i.e. myself, Kirk, and all other true Bible-believing Christians).
Christians want your soul to spend eternity in paradise a.k.a. Heaven.
atheists, on the other hand, couldn't care less about your soul, nor if you instead spend eternity in Hell.
So how does that not make the Christians the good guys and the atheists the bad guys?
"Science creates fictions to explain facts" – Gilman
No, I'm not kidding.
Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron are among the very few high profile Bible-believing Christians in the world. That makes it all the more the shame to see one of them ruin his great work for no good reason with an unnecessary & nefarious endorsement.
"Science creates fictions to explain facts" – Gilman
[. Twist of nature, comparable to i.e.siamese twins...
...or to Down's syndrome.]
...or to the most similar of all mental disorders to "homosexuality": pedophilia
it has been scientifically proven that "homosexuality" is caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain combined with an over-exaggeration of the need to be loved
just because it is a genetic defect, that does not *exscuse* it. pedophiles and serial killers are born with mental defects too; and that does not justify their deviant behaviour. neither does it in the case of "homosexuality"
liberals want to brainwash everyone into believing the lie that the evil cesspool scum world they have created has always been the one and only world that exists, in order so people become fooled into believing that no alternative exists to said liberal evil cesspool scum world.
In reality, however, the 1950's was a utopia of paradise compared to the modern day liberal evil cesspool scum world.
[Note the dialogue of Euthypho and Socrates: conclusion that what is pious is not because of the quality that it is loved by a god, but for a reason inherent in it, and that the god loves it because it is good.]
Socrates is in Hell right now, burning as we speak. He knew nothing of God, or what is good. So you picked a very bad example to quote from about this subject.
Humans do not have minds capable of knowing what is "good" better than God does. For example, you see many people on this site promoting and/or defending evil causes such as "homosexuality" (one reason why Socrates is now in Hell, by the way) and genocide against human children. They have no basis for saying these things are "good", yet they do. These things are in fact very evil. Many men who society considers "wise" are actually fools. So says God, and God is correct.
God knows what is good and what is not good. His opinion is the one that counts. Not the petty, evil opinion of man. Christ has said that mankind will naturally promote wickedness and evil instead of doing good. That is why you see things like "Gay Pride Parades" and genocide against children. Because the foolishness of man says that "these things are good!" It does not matter how many say that evil things are good - evil things will *NEVER* be good.
It is true that Atheists have no morality. Because a man in his natural state will almost always automatically promote and defend evildoings. Like Akriku and ACElethal and other Atheists promoting "homosexuality", for example. To be moral requires a man to leave his natural state and allow himself to become righteous. Atheists almost never have a reason to do this since they do not obey God's commands, and hence most Atheists have no morality
(from a discussion of the movie Pleasantville, when asked why he'd called the film evil):
I haven't seen this since I was tricked into doing so when it was originally in the theaters, therefore my answer won't be as comprehensive as it could be if I'd seen it recently, but here are some of the reasons:
1. It glorifies Onanism.
2. It glorifies fornication.
3. It misrepresents people who have wholesome family values as idiots.
4. It misrepresents people who have wholesome family values as racists.
5. It says the world is bad if it is a good world that has morality.
6. It says the world is good if it is an evil world that has no morality.
darwin a 'genius', ...way to worship your god again in grand idolatry, darwinists. [[roll]]
I wonder if they are gonna put signs around his 'heritage home' celebrating his/their incest heritage, showing all the places he banged his cousin in his incest/heritage home? Oh wait, that would be bad for PR and when something is bad for PR darwinists just sweep it under the rug and pretend it doesn't exist...so guess they won't be doing that.