I am not advocating domestic violence; but a husband who tracks his wife's time, whereabouts, and associations is NOT being abusive--he is RULING over his wife as God expects him to.
75 comments
No, he's being a dick. Privacy is a basic human right.
And God doesn't have a fuck to do with it, he doesn't exist, and it's not his relationship anyway.
He may have his dominion, yes. Question is, will he also have his wife's love?
Somehow, I doubt he will...
And conveniently, if said wife's actions don't align with what God and said husband (funny how the two match up) feel she should be doing, then it's only right for him to lay a holy smackdown on her, yes? God of love my hairy ass.
I told my wife that if I ever acted like this, she had my full permission (even though she doesn't need it) to beat me over the head with whatever heavy object she picks up first. But what this insecure nitwit is advocating is stalking. Does God treat his wife like this? I wonder what the argument sounds like when she gets home. I bet the makeup sex sucks though.
I am not advocating domestic violence, but a husband who tracks his wife's time, whereabout, and associations deserves to be kicked in the balls with steel-toed boots, by said wife. Repeat as needed.
Why oh why would anyone ever feel the need to track a spouse's time, whereabouts and associations? If they have a good marriage, it's unnecessary. If they don't have a good marriage, it won't help.
Not a shining endorsement of your gender, David J.
I wonder what misogynists would do without each other -- they think so little of men who aren't exactly like them (paranoid, insecure, domineering control freaks with no empathy), women are less than dirt to them -- so whose left to be friends with?
What a miserable existence.
If this man has a wife, I hope that unfortunate woman sees one of these pamphlets *soon*.
And I believe I will hug my wife very hard when I get home. This is such an advertisement for singletonhood and two-woman marriage. I'm so grateful I know that most men aren't like this!
...he is RULING over his wife as God expects him to.
I don't remember hearing from god on the subject.
I remember reading a lot mindless shit written by misogynistic Bronze Age Middle Eastern goat herders thousands of years ago.
/I am not advocating domestic violence; but a husband who tracks his wife's time, whereabouts, and associations is NOT being abusive--/
No, he's being a crazy STALKER who deserves to be locked up. How would you feel if your hypothetical wife always felt the need to track your time, whereabouts, and associations? You'd call her a nagging, hen-pecking lunatic, wouldn't you?
Your wife is not your daughter. As a matter of fact, if the man was controlling enough to the extreme, this wouldn't even be healthy in a father-daughter relationship. What a moron.
Er, no. That is CONTROLLING BEHAVIOR, and thus ABUSIVE.
(I speak from personal experience.)
What you are advocating leads all too frequently to domestic violence. That's why it's against the law.
I had a boyfriend start this shit with me. I dumped him. All women should end relationships that start this creepy pattern--it never ends well.
And I suppose a beating is alright as well?
Jackass, I bet you are not married? You might have a punching bag, but not a wife I bet.
Jeeze, did this guy attend the WWE school of marriage counseling?
Also, if this is so biblical why can't this jackhole cite chapter & verse to support this crap?
You couldn't rule over a roomful of two-year-olds if your life depended on it, and I don't even think you're married. I think you're probably typing this in your mommy's basement. She told me to tell you to get off the fucking computer, she needs to use the phone.
I rather doubt your wife agrees with the absolutist authoritarian dictatorship of Orwellian proportions that you have turned your household into.
Divorce in THREE, TWO, ONE...
I don't see a reference to GPS technology anywhere in the babble. Ditto recent calls and texts on cell phones, emails, Facebook friends, or monthly phone bills, credit card statements and other paper trails. I guess you're just an insecure stalking asshole.
I honestly could never marrry a man like you! No offense! If Jesus came in the flesh in front of your very eyes this minute you would probably condemn him for not having a wife. PLEASE DON'T BE A PHARISEE!
Love,
a sinner who has faith = )
A husband who tracks his wife's time, whereabouts and associations is SO being abusive, and will (hopefully) soon find himself in jail, where the guards will track HIS time, whereabouts and associations. Nice Karma!
A beginning like "I am not [something or other], but..." is not a promising beginning, Davey dear.
You ARE actually advocating domestic violence; that is crystal clear in the last part of your sentence.
"I am not advocating domestic violence; but a husband who tracks his wife's time, whereabouts, and associations is NOT being abusive--he is RULING over his wife as God expects him to."
...so saying in Guam, and not, say, Saudi Arabia or Iran.
But then even these countries would draw the line with the very reason why you're holed up in Guam eh Davey-boy, you kiddy-diddling nonce?*
As if you'd have any experience with being married eh, Dave? I doubt any country's age of consent laws would conform with your personal tastes eh?! And pre-pubescent girls are much easier to rule over - certainly physically. Eh, Dave?
...and I very much doubt you'd get the Disney Channel in Saudi Arabia or Iran.
*- http://davidjstewartexposed.blogspot.com/
Yes, but I'm not about to try it. I hate hospital food.
(Seriously, David J. belongs in a century long past.)
Translation: "David J. Stewart" is a pathetic asshole, who is misusing religion to justify his bullying, stalking, control-freak behaviour.
a husband who tracks his wife's time, whereabouts, and associations is NOT being abusive
There are many lists of symptoms and warning signs that very strongly indicate an abusive partner, and they vary quite a bit. I think you'll find, however, that this particular symtom is mentioned, usually near the top of the list, by fucking all of them.
“…but a husband who tracks his wife's time, whereabouts, and associations is NOT being abusive-”
If the government paid that much attention to YOUR life you’d lose your shit. You’d cry about the violation of your freedoms as guaranteed in the Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence, and the Mayflower Compact.
And then turn around and insist God gave you the right to do the exact same thing to your wife.
"he is RULING over his wife as God expects him to.”
Ruling? Where did ruling come in?
Um, there’s a bit of ajump, there, between KNOWING where she is at all times, and who with, and DOING something about it, right?
I do mean, if someone told me they saw my wife at a place she didn’t tell me i’d been, that’s just information. If it was someplace i had TOLD her not to go, that would be abuse.
If i then punish her or take steps to make sure she CANNOT go to that place, or be with that person, that’s where the abuse comes in, David.
Why else would you track her movements and associations, if not to limit those that misplease you? Or better, is there a NON-ABUSIVE reason to know every single person she meets and talks with?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.