Essentially I would like to see the Freemasons hunted down and eradicated from the face of the earth; perferably by an appropriate method which is a suitable "karmic" sentence such as exposure to depleted uranium, ritual human sacrifice, and the various Masonic methods of execution, the slaughtering of their membership on the altars of their temples, etc., however the wholesale nuclear destruction of the command and control centres (such as the City of London) of the Capitalists would suffice to begin with.
21 comments
Whoopee, first approved quote. But anyways... although I knew there were anti-Masonic conspiracy theories, I'd never before seen someone express this sort of visceral, "kill em all" hatred for them of the sort constantly levied against Jews, blacks and homosexuals. Kind of disheartening, I guess; not even the members of a funny old men's club that does charity work are free from hate speech.
Your gentle philosophy charms us all. Where can we sign up?
After we've killed all the Freemasons, I take it all will be well with the world. But, I think what many people would like to know is after the Freemasons are all killed, what group of people should be next? I do hope it's a minority group.
If you're insane, post your answer on DavidIcke.com, we'll spot it there. Enjoying your sagacity. Thanks.
@Doubting Thomas:
Depleted uranium was used in armor-piercing munitions fired by US and Coalition forces during both the 2003 invasion and the 1991 Gulf war in Iraq.The health impacts of depleted uranium have been subject to international debate since the 1991 Gulf war in Iraq, and the US and British governments have disputed allegations that their weapons have poisoned soldiers and civilians and caused increased rates of cancer and birth defects. Depleted uranium is 40 percent less radioactive than uranium in its natural form, but the heavy metal is toxic and can potentially cause kidney damage, according to the US Department of Defense.
Doctors and researchers have reported increased rates of cancer and birth defects in areas where coalition forces used depleted uranium, but a lack of data and long-term studies in contaminated areas make it difficult to determine if depleted uranium contributed to the uptick in health problems along with other environmental and war-related factors, according to the report.
That's all quite true, nazani14, but you must admit it's a pretty iffy method of revenge. I get the impression that this kook thinks he could sneak a chunk of "depleted uranium" into someones closet and they would melt in a few days.
I certainly don't dispute the potential danger of breathing a significant amount of uranium dust but virtually all forms of metal dust pose significant hazards. Statistically though, the risk posed by the little hard radiation in depleted uranium is probably insignificant compared to it's innate properties as a chemically reactive heavy metal.
I love how people think Uranium is dangerous for it's radiation. Most fissile metals are far more dangerous to your body as a heavy metal than they are for their minute levels of radioactivity.
Seriously, the C14 in your blood is around ONE MILLION times more radioactive than Uranium. I even had a few profs who willingly ingested Plutonium (itself more than ten times more radioactive than Uranium) in order to study the effects of heavy metals on the human body.
Good luck doing that, because as the Freemasons control the world, they will thus use your attempt to eradicate them for their own benefit. Be afraid, be very afraid.
@Dinomancer
Allow me to place you in a room with some decaying uranium and we will see what happens. RADON!
The alpha radiation from plutonium does not penetrate the skin but inhalation and or ingestion can irradiate internal organs. Your professors may have ingested very small amounts but even then their sanity is questionable.
@michael3ov
First off, uranium is always decaying, all radioactive isotopes are.
Second, I can see that one of us has already been in a room with uranium, and it's not you. I am a geologist and in the course of getting my degree I worked in a research reactor. Not only have I been in the room with uranium, but I have held it in my hands.
Now, while it is true that uranium is always decaying, it decays at such a slow rate as to be borderline inert. With an average half life on the order of billions of years, even Radon buildup is only an issue in areas where large amounts of uranium have been contained in the bedrock and the gas has been allowed to build up for hundreds of millions of years (such as the American Midwest).
If you were talking about something that decays rapidly, such as strontium 90 or Iodine 131, my reaction is different. I don't even want to be in the same building as those isotopes. Uranium, however, has an un-deserved reputation for danger.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.