[From “A hereditarian revolution, maybe”]

Back in February, Nathan Cofnas wrote an influential piece A Guide for the Hereditarian Revolution[…]
The Republicans have taken control of the presidency, senate, very probably the house, and they already had the supreme court. While Trump does occasionally post about intelligence, genetics, crime etc., he’s not an intellectual. However, the vice president elect[…]Vance reads books and blogs[…]There is a decent chance he knows the central facts of HBD (defined broadly as biological influences on human differences, whether these are sexes, sexual orientations, races, criminals[…]). To this we can add that Elon musk follows and engages with Crémieux, Wilfred Reilly, i/o, datahazard, Colin Wright, Hanania, as well as edge accounts iamyesyouareno and Defiant L’s. Given that Musk grew up in South Africa, he’s almost guaranteed to know about Black-White IQ gaps and crime rates. Given this, some of the Republican elites can probably be assumed to be at least HBD aware

Does this change anything? Hanania thinks most politics is top-down[…]Maybe for the first time in a while, some top US politicians are red pilled. This has happened before. Take this recording of a phone call between US Republican president Richard Nixon and his advisor Daniel Moynihan in 1971[…]

The 25-minute conversation begins with a discussion about an article called “IQ” that Richard Herrnstein had just published in The Atlantic and that Moynihan had sent to Nixon. This was a comprehensive, 18-page explanation of the heritability of intelligence[…]

Their policy of keeping it secret that they knew led to another 50+ years of race conflicts, affirmative action and a climate of lies[…]
•Something must be done about the egalitarian infestation in academia[…]
•Punish publicly funded universities that undermine science by firing or otherwise harassing dissident professors[…]
•Musk must make sure there are non-Woke AIs on the market