This book reveals that vaccination is not a medical treatment; it is a superstitious religious ritual. One who seeks a religious exemption from vaccination is not seeking a religious exemption from a medical treatment but rather a religious exemption from an unsafe and ineffective religious custom. All governments that mandate vaccination violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment by requiring participation in a religious ritual. Unfortunately, litigants arguing for a religious exemption from vaccines are not making that claim. Typically, they limit their argument to a Freedom of Religion claim, arguing for a religious exemption from a medical treatment.

To make a successful Establishment Clause argument, it is necessary first to understand the superstitious religious origins of vaccines, their dangers, and inefficacy. The dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccines are outgrowths of the unscientific, superstitious origins of vaccines. Indeed, it can properly be said that ineffectiveness and hazards are features of vaccines. Once a litigant raises an Establishment of Religion issue, the vaccine dangers and ineffectiveness become germane. But most people do not know that vaccination is a religious ritual. And thus, they are not aware they have a valid Establishment Clause argument against vaccination.
<...>
The theory of vaccines is to inject poison into a healthy person (which is an evil act) so that later the person will develop an immunity to the antigen (the expected good outcome). Vaccination is premised on the heresy that it is okay to do evil so that good may come about from it. In Romans 3:8, God calls that ethic “damnable.” Vaccination is a sin. No Christian should ever participate in the practice.

To support the argument that vaccination is a sin that violates Romans 3:8, the Christian must be able to bring evidence proving that vaccination is evil. That evil is most clearly seen by the death and injury vaccines cause.

<Paperback $ 29.00>