I've never served in the armed forces so I don't have a full understanding of requirements necessary to serve. That being said though, from my understanding, there is a requirement that ALL enlisted must be combat ready.
Now if Johnny enlists in the Army and gets his dangly bits cut off to become Jane, then he/she/it is no longer combat ready. Furthermore, if he/she/it is taking gender bending hormone treatments, I cannot imagine those would be readily available on the battlefield.
What are these weirdos gonna do? Ask the terrorists to pause shooting at them while they take their pills or injections or whatever?
9 comments
So, enlisted women can't get pregnant, either? There's no way some weirdo with a parasite is combat ready...
You might want to actually look up the official military policies on transgenders before spouting off about them. AND maybe look up just how many people who identify as transgender are actively seeking a sex change operation.
You don't have a full understanding of quite a number of things.
What makes you think women in the military aren't combat ready? They go through the same basic training as men. I have both nieces and nephews who were in the army, and all of them were combat ready, especially when they were posted to Afghanistan.
Someone taking hormone treatments, whether in the military or not, are not tied to an IV drip. They take whatever drugs they need on a daily basis, spending 5-10 seconds on it.
How does getting one's bits cut off make them no longer combat ready?
As for pills or shots? You realize in the battlefield there will be plenty of time where there is no one killing each other? Much of the time is spent waiting for fighting to start. That gives them plenty of time to take their pills or shots.
So yeah your move how are they not battle ready?
"Furthermore, if he/she/it is taking gender bending hormone treatments, I cannot imagine those would be readily available on the battlefield."
It`s a couple of pills, yeah if they pack `em, they`ll be aviable on the battlefield as you`ve described.
Now if Johnny enlists in the Army and gets his dangly bits cut off to become Jane, then he/she/it is no longer combat ready.
You might have had a fraction of a point if military firearms had safeties that were designed so only contact with your junk would allow them to be toggled, if body armor had a slot that required the insertion of the wearer's dick for the kevlar plates to actually absorb the impact of fired bullets, and if fighting vehicles needed a wang slotted in to the driver's or pilot's seat to act as the key to actually power them on.
Since none of these are the case, you are one hundred percent full of shit. Please do not continue taking your lack of understanding about things as an excuse to talk out of your ass rather than fucking look it up so you know what you're talking about.
from my understanding, there is a requirement that ALL enlisted must be combat ready.
Now if Johnny enlists in the Army and gets his dangly bits cut off to become Jane, then he/she/it is no longer combat ready
...and this stops Jane from wielding another kind of weapon... how ?!
Oh, and strange how cigarettes were no longer in MREs up to the mid-late 1970s: what are these closeted weirdos going to do for their 'symbols of masculinity' when they're not readily available on the battlefield?!
Question: Are post offices where one can receive MREs ordered via mreinfo.com readily available on the battlefield? Of course not (and here's the clincher, folks...!): they're issued to troops beforehand.
image
Landscape gardener & outdoorsman, MRE collector/trader & taste-reviewer, Jesus of YouTube & cool dude Steve1989 takes a P-38 to your 'argument'. His reaction? Nice hiss.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.