For context, it's in relation to a post the OP has about objective morality, and how morality is only objective because because God makes the morals, and that makes them objective.
This is someone rightly pointing out that that doesn't make the morals objective, it makes them subjective to the particular God's whims.
And then they respond with this nonsense. Redefining words and logical fallacies.
This Daniel person is an idiot. No, objective doesn't mean any sort of "mind independent" it means as close to facts without personal feelings, emotions, or opinions. And no, a being with opinions, emotions, and feelings can make points that don't include any if them.
People take exception to tying some more vague god to objective morality because they try to immediately shift the goal posts and sneak in the god of the Bible. A particular diety who is very wishy washy, petty, changes his mind, takes part on and encourages his followers to commit atrocities. Someone who no one can successfully claim would be an objective arbiter of morality.