There is a real definition, it just goes unacknowledged because it is seen as "harmful". Canadians are those who were either born here or naturalized WITH western European ancestry.

In historic terms, better at what exactly?
Military? Hell no.
Religion? Hell no.
Architecture? Hell no.
Art? Hell no.
Science and the Scientific method? Hell no.
Writing? Hell no.
Literature? Not even close.
Medicine? Nope.
Linguistics? Lol no.
Engineering? Nope.

Bureaucracy? Yep. Certainly. They are inventors of an autocratic state run by babudom.

Nearly everything worthy of human appreciation was born in Roman, Hellenic, Persian and Indic Empires. Chinese have been nothing more than footnotes. Nothing beautiful or glorious came out of those barbarians.

I would be glad to appreciate them, there is no evidence of theoretical 'Chinese superiority'.

They are a rice-munching civilization which bred like rats for thousands of years just to slaughter each other again and again, then repeat, copy paste.

If you understand how China works, you will consider every Chinese person who moves to your country as a spy.

They ALL must report back to mainland and the CCP

Indian guys are like the Asian women of the corporate world. Got to appease those liberal Whites.

She's from China even if she was born in Ireland because that's where her ancestors came from. Just like the snakes are from Burma even though they were born in Florida because that's where their ancestors came from.

I highly doubt Jefferson was cooking up the Freedom of Religion clause for the future benefit of what he would consider bizarre religions of the orient, pagans, or satanism/witchery.

The 1st amendment addressed freedom of Christianity (Baptist, Protestant, etc. ) not any religion. Founders knew other religions bring strife and destruction

The idea that any religion, other than Christianity,would have been protected by the first amendment would have been anathema to the founders.

(Context: A reddit post about how Asian Americans fared the best economically after the pandemic of 2020)

South Asians need to be separated out. They are a completely different group and have a different experience. This is more obfuscation. If anything, South Asians are the model minority. East Asians are the despised enemy, the perpetual foreigners.

Nihal when British people hear your name you're instantly coded as foreign. It's reflexive we have no say in it. Even the most polite English people will hear your name, and see your skin and think "foreign", " that nice Indian fella", and will change their behaviour accordingly

yes after we freed it with our Christian values

the japanese did not have a word for freedom or understand concept from Shinto principles

also most Americans would be dissapointed at their version of freedom

None of the asian religions have any concepts relating to freedom and liberty

Prior to our winning the japanese people have no historical concept of freedom or liberty

Those concepts only appeared after Christianity spread

The jewish culture had it, but that was it worldwide

Neither you or your sister will ever be “Americans”. You are paper Americans. Anyone who meets you will always describe you as a Serb from Montenegro.

Try traveling to a foreign a country like Croatia and telling them you’re an “American”. They’d laugh at you.

They're not and will never be Canadian. I don't care what their passport says.
Just like I will never be an Indian from India - even if I was born there.

To have no religious test for civil office communicates there is zero connection between religious belief & morality/ability to rule well.

Of course, this is clearly false. Those rejecting future judgment cannot be trusted (which is why courts once prohibited atheist testimony).

Canadians also can't be Asian. Canadian is an ethnicity. I won't tolerate or even entertain genocidal talk about how "Canadians don't even exist". We are the descendants of English, Scottish, Irish, French settlers and Natives.

1. Objective does not mean mind independent, it means “human” mind independent.

2. If you make your argument it defeats itself because you, a subjective mind, wouldn’t not be able to make an objective true argument, so your argument defeats itself

1) There was no America or country of any kind until the Europeans came here and built one. It was just open land.
2) The “Native Americans” come from Asia — no different than Europeans exploring/settling here. They have no claim to the land, because they didn’t build a nation.

In hindsight it's amazing to think that Whites were ever duped into believing that we're the same as a race of people who routinely kill each other over sneakers.

I've learnt to side with the "bad" people of my own kind even over the "good" people of another's.

It's the only sane strategy. No more half measures. We have to go all in on tribalism.

It's that kind of loyalty that alone has the power to rebuild broken racial bonds.

Once again, there is no such thing as a Palestinian.

Arab countries creating a political spectacle by refusing to accept their own citizens back 60 years ago did not magically create an ethnic people.

Allow me to help you understand your 'Britishness' vs my Britishness,
@Bushra1Shaikh

• You're as British as Shamima Begum. Meaning, your 'Britishness' is a piece of paper, it's subject to T&Cs.

• My Britishness is tied to bloodline & genetic - it's not subject to any T&Cs.

Southerners conquered Indians (not native Americans mind you) rightfully. The act of conquering another group of people, especially groups as satanic as the Indians, is not intrinsically wrong.7153

Notice how White people are courteous enough and never claim other people’s ethnicities?

In contrast to the migrants in our countries who are desperate to be considered part of our ethnicities

(Referring to the Peckham incident in London)

For everyone ready to say "Its not all Pakistanis" or "It's not about race", tell that to the victims, tell that to the people in your country being replaced by these third worlders.

It should be an English shopkeeper in an English shop with English customers but all the natives were forced out decades ago.

Enough is enough, they have to go back.

When the founders put “freedom of religion” in the Constitution they meant freedom within the Christian religion…it never entered their heads that we would allow the plurality of pagan religions in this confederation of states.

You could choose to obey God in the same sense a lion can choose to be vegetarian. Is it impossible? No, he could get enough nutrition that way if he chose the right plants. Nobody is stopping him. But he won't. You won't obey God. You don't want anything to do with his laws. You are choosing in accordance with your nature as a sinner. Why do you complain about being judged when you do what you want to do? You are not compelled by God to sin.