Henry de Lesquen #wingnut #racist

Henry de Lesquen #wingnut #racist lesquen.fr

[Translated from "Qu’est-ce que le cosmopolitisme ?" - "What's Cosmopolitanism?"]

"Cosmopolitan", which means "world citizen"[…]is by itself a subreption because every city imply an inside and an outside, an inclusion-exclusion relationship[…]{b]The so-called "cosmopolitan" can't be world citizen, he's citizen from nothing and he claims the world only to deny his duties to the city[…]
By inventing the city, the Greeks gave to patriotism its purest and most exigeant form[…]
Cosmopolitanism is one of the facets of the egalitarian utopia, the anarchistic and carnavalesque version[…]
A Cosmopolitan is a foreigner in his own city. He's also "foreign to himself", as per Julia Kristeva[…]
For this radical Cosmopolitanism, one can become free only though freeing oneself from traditions[…]True humanism[…]know freedom comes from identity[…]
World should be considered as the city of every man, and reject peculiar identity establishing barrers inside mankind. But, as we told, the city can't exist without borders[…]
There is thus an organic link between "cynical" immporality of Cosmopolitan ideology of the world superclass[…]and the Immigrationnism which is the Alpha and the Omega of the globalist speech

We shouldn't be surprised the world superclass worships the degenerate non-art absuively described as contemporary art[…]{b]Degenerate non-art, termed "contemporary art", is a vector of Cosmopolitanism. It subverts the sense of beauty, oppose traditions and has nor estriction when attacking artistic patromony, as shwon on 2008 by Jeff Koons in Versailles

7 comments

I reject your assertion that identity needs an enemy Other, and especially to consider all the Others enemies.

Identity is NOT exclusive - especiallay not identities on different levels, that are subsets of each other. There is no contradiction in identifying with both your town and your nation, with the many layers of cultures and regions in between, with the greater supernational culture circles, civilisations and alliances your country, and with humanity as a whole, and with our planet (…and with sapient life, be it terrestrial or not, etc.). Nor with all the other identities of completely different kinds like philosophy, profession, class, etc.
How narrow your minds and how small your hearts must be. I could almost pity you, were you not such vile creatures.
Now, I do admit: you are indeed an Other, THE Other, to me, and I do indeed regard you with great hostility and incomprehension. But this is not born out of a tribalism, but from ideology; not from a hatred of tradition itself, but of the cult of tradition and of xenophobia.

The OP fell victim to the delusion of being a great philosopher or something - but in reality it's completly arbitrary rambling, a non-consistent salad of ad hoc definitions and social resentment.

Ah, bullshit.
when i served on the sub, my loyalty was to my division over the other knuckleheads in my department. But i also was loyal to my department over the pervs in other departments. then again, my crew was more important than any other crew. but any sub had my loyalty over any surface ship. but anything navy was superior to anything army, air force, coast guard….
but i’d support our army overany other country’s…
loyalty is not exclusive.

I've actually read a few things about this, and I dunno, I kinda like the idea, I'm a citizen of the world...

Coruscant in "Star Wars": one big planet-city. Earth in "Star Trek": after that initial First Contact with those from Vulcan, the planet's peoples are united under a Federation of Planets. Earth no longer has separate countries: the planet governed from the UFP's HQ in San Francisco.

Just the production design art alone for the above regenerates our vision of the future of humanity.

Even that for Cyberpunk owes an eternal debt of gratitude to Syd Mead: a futurist...!