Um... what?
I've been trying to learn how to dissect this kind of bullshit, let's see how this pile turns out:
"Atheists are equally as stupid with their definition of 'proof'. They believe anything that their 5 senses show them is proof."
Well, let's see here, not using your 5 senses, convince me that your computer screen exists. If you tried, you would have no idea it existed, let alone how to communicate this idea to me in the first place.
Wait a minute... This is a scientist's point of view, not an atheist's! Yet another of the various mistakes here.
"Well here is a question, what makes you think your 5 senses have the ability to know/understand all things? What makes you think they are all powerful???"
Strawmen on parade...
What scientists do is use their 5 senses to make observations, then using the information they obtained, logically deduce possiblities and try to understand why things are the way they are, for various reasons.
"They could very well be limited. The 5 senses are Atheist's God."
Regardless of whether our senses are limited to certain planes of information (and I highly doubt this is what you're even talking about), we can still use the information we can obtain to discover many wonderful things, such as the fact that we have a limited field of observation
"The 5 senses are Atheist's God."
Well, assuming you're speaking metaphorically, how would you like to go blind or deaf? I don't know about you, but I generally consider all 5 of my senses relatively important.