well let's see, many serial killers have come out and said they saw their victims as worthless wastes of space (essentially)--in their view it wasn't murder, guess we have to posthumously pardon all of those who have been executed and pardon those who are rotting in jail right at this moment

anyway this is why philosophical arguments of this particular nature need to be dismissed outright. they are not conducive to the abortion debate at all, and more often than not the person making the argument doesn't know what tf they're even talking about. they just straight up ignore that the issue pro-lifers have with abortion is that it kills young humans, not that it's a person, not that we ascribe a value judgement to a young human based on his or her location, sex, or potential, not that we think a fetus at four months development is "exactly like" a toddler. they do not want to know our stance so it is not even worth debating with people like this. they are bad actors, especially if they are trying to weasel you into agreeing that some humans aren't "human" and thus it is perfectly fine to infringe upon their rights. like come tf on. this dumbass would be singing a different tune if someone told them it was ok if they were murdered because "well your murderer would think it's justified because they didn't think you had value as a human :-)"