"Why does the Bible say that the wicked will be destroyed with unquenchable fire?"
The fact you placed a question mark on the end of that, coupled with this:
Mistranslations of Sheol, Hades, Tartarus and Gehenna
The last one is about the mistranslation word hell"
Is extremely telling. Also contradicting yourself - and thus destroying your own argument - much? Not exactly seeing the words 'Professor of Theology' before your name, boy. Proof that we Atheists know infinitely more about your own 'beliefs' than you fundies do:
'the concept of eternal punishment in hell’ is an unbiblical pagan doctrine embraced and christianised by the Roman Catholic Church in the early centuries of Christianity, and made official when Jerome translated the Bible into Latin in the Latin Vulgate (circa 400 AD).
The doctrine of everlasting punishment in hell’ is founded upon a combination of mistranslations and misinterpretations of the following Hebrew and Greek words.
Mistranslations of the Hebrew word sheol, and the Greek words hades, tartarus and gehenna, to mean hell.
Mistranslations of the Hebrew word owlam, and the Greek words aion and aionios, to mean forever or everlasting when relating to God’s judgement of unbelievers and fallen angels.'
'She'ol (/'?i?o?l/ SHEE-ohl or /'?i??l/ SHEE-?l; Hebrew ??????? ?ôl), in the Hebrew Bible, is a place of darkness to which all the dead go, both the righteous and the unrighteous, regardless of the moral choices made in life, a place of stillness and darkness cut off from life and from the Hebrew God'
Your 'God' is the Jewish one, is he not; what the OT is based on, and all that jazz...!
Like I say: that question mark on the end of your assertion. Methinks a little chink of doubt in your 'Faith' armour, little not-Professor of Theology Weetryhard. >:D
Thus you being the retarded fundie Tryhard you are. Knowing, despite your being in that river in Egypt - re. your delusions - about the fact that the world is no longer bending to your will (otherwise, your country would be the Eternal Talibangelist Theocracy of Godsville by now). Must suck, always being proved wrong, Weetryhard. Being the educationally superior Atheists, we in FSTDT wouldn't know about that, however.
"In any case Sweetride, you judge the god of the bible as well, even if you don't think so."
(OP: Words carved into the wall of a WWII concentration camp by one of the Jewish prisoners; emphasis added):
'If there is a god, he will have to beg for my forgiveness.'.
So much for that 'Covenant' by God & his 'Chosen People'; just ask the survivor of Auschwitz I once met & talked with, who saw his entire family murdered before his eyes by the SS. His Jewish faith died along with his family that day.
"And as well, Sweetride, quoting a bunch of bible verses won't avail you. The bible isn't true just because you believe it is."
(OP): "Just because a person believes something does not make it True."
'Teach the Controversy' via the Cre(a)ti(o)nist fundies, post-Kitzmiller vs. Dover; the notion that 'if scientific fact is taught in US schools, why can't other Creation stories?'
Which means - by the likes of Answers in Genesis's logic - the Mayan 'Popol Vuh', the Aboriginal 'Dreamtime' and the 'OT-III Incident Document', the basis of $cientology, have as much credibility as Genesis in the Judeo-Christian Bible (thus the Jewish 'G_d' = yours, Weetryhard), therefore L. Ron Hubbard is God, and you fundies don't have the right to deny that fact, and 'Teach the Controversy' has blown up in their own faces. To say nothing of what you fundies claim, and MK destroys your own argument thusly.
Because to quote your new God, L. Ron Hubbard:
'What's True, is true for you.'
After all: when your very own J-boy was asked by Pontius Pilate 'What is Truth?', he couldn't answer.
And if he can't give a precise, exact dictionary definition of that word, then so much for the 'Omniscience' of your so-called 'God', Weetryhard. Jesus = God, amirite? Thus what one knows, the other components of the 'Trinity' (Jesus, 'Holy Spook') do; a 'Hive Mind' a la the Borg.
If your 'God' doesn't know what that word means, then he's not 'Omnipotent', therefore he's not God, ergo he doesn't exist.
...unless you'd care to prove we Atheists wrong. But only with hard, solid, empirical secular peer reviewed evidence, and to our satisfaction. NOW.
Every second you can't, you yourself only serve to prove the non-existence of your 'God'. But then, if he was all he was cracked up to be...:
...then what's stopping him from doing a Morgan Freeman in "Bruce Almighty": to everyone in the world simultaneously? You tell me.
Prove the existence of the 'Soul' first (thus everything follows from that); again, using hard, solid, scientific, empirical secular peer reviewed evidence, and to the satisfaction of we Atheists now. No 'Faith' or subjective 'Truth' allowed. Go ahead.
You know what you'll be admitting when you CAN'T.
A rainbow doesn't physically exist, yet it can be seen. Therefore the concept of the so-called 'Spiritual'/'Supernatural' is destroyed.
Again: must suck for you fundies, always being proved wrong. We Atheists wouldn't know about that, however. We have the evidence. Facts. Reality. We win.