this article is BIASED
Why? Just because it doesn't support your assertions? That's not bias, that's you being wrong and crying about it.
there is no talk of intelligent design or desputes
A few things...
1) Why would there be any mention about ID? Intelligent Design makes no predictions, just blanket assertions of special creation and evolution denial. Tell me, what do either of those have to do with an Australopithecus skeleton?
2) What in the name of fuck is a despute?
AND NO WHERE DOES IT SAY LUCY IS A FAKE!!!!!
And nowhere was it ever proven to be a fake. Just because you said so, and used ALLCAPS doesn't make it true. You lose.
no where is there any mention of lucy being a fraud
Why would anyone mention that? It's not been proven to be a fraud. A Wikipedia article is there to provide information from citable sources, not as a bully pulpit for unfounded assertions and creationist propaganda, That's what you dipshits have Conservapedia.
someone change this please!
Too scared to do it yourself? afraid someone might confront you about sources and your narrow worldview might come crumbling down? Coward.