this article is BIASED. there is no talk of intelligent design or desputes AND NO WHERE DOES IT SAY LUCY IS A FAKE!!!!! no where is there any mention of lucy being a fraud. someone change this please!
46 comments
[this article is BIASED.]
In the same sense that the IQ tests are biased against stupid people, yes it is.
You know what? I'm going to write to Wikipedia about Jesus.
"Baaaaaw, this article is BIASED! There is no talk about him being a zombie or shooting laser beams out of his eyes and NO WHERE DOES IT SAY JESUS IS A GUITAR HERO!! No where is there any mention of Jesus actually being a major televangelist while inventing rock n' roll in Jerusalem. Someone change this, please!"
If anyone asks me what I'm smoking, I'll puff up and say, "I'm a Anachronistic Jebuswasarockstarite, you bigoted commie socialist liberal evolutionist!!"
Lucy was, indeed, a very, very ancient ancestor of yours. She was somewhat more intelligent than you, to be sure, but the relationship is valid. And educated people do not discuss "intelligent design."
Response:
Dear anon, I hesitate to tell you this, but unfortunately sometimes verifiable reality is biased. Particularly against fraudsters like the "intelligent design" cdesign proponentsists. Not sure about these desputes, any relation to Despute Dawg? . . dave souza, talk 08:15, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
LULZ
this article is BIASED
Why? Just because it doesn't support your assertions? That's not bias, that's you being wrong and crying about it.
there is no talk of intelligent design or desputes
A few things...
1) Why would there be any mention about ID? Intelligent Design makes no predictions, just blanket assertions of special creation and evolution denial. Tell me, what do either of those have to do with an Australopithecus skeleton?
2) What in the name of fuck is a despute?
AND NO WHERE DOES IT SAY LUCY IS A FAKE!!!!!
And nowhere was it ever proven to be a fake. Just because you said so, and used ALLCAPS doesn't make it true. You lose.
no where is there any mention of lucy being a fraud
Why would anyone mention that? It's not been proven to be a fraud. A Wikipedia article is there to provide information from citable sources, not as a bully pulpit for unfounded assertions and creationist propaganda, That's what you dipshits have Conservapedia.
someone change this please!
Too scared to do it yourself? afraid someone might confront you about sources and your narrow worldview might come crumbling down? Coward.
No, this is Wiki pedia, you want Conserva pedia. It's down the hall, turn right and look for lots of tinfoil hats. You can't miss it.
That's because Lucy is not a fraud and intelligent design does not belong in an article on evolution.
Accurate information is not bias. If you want articles that agree with you go hang out at Conservapedia.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.