Also, be sure to check out the post after this one. It's sort of an epilogue to this post.
Ray realises he's been shown up as far as the issues go and so decides to save himself in the eyes of his idolaters by pulling a classic Ray move,
"The evolutionary explanation of where male and female must have come from, has angered some believers in the theory. Calling me an idiot, a rat, a dummy, stupid, a hypocrite, an imbecile, dense, brainless, a dimwit, an uneducated fool, a liar, or a combination of these is okay. However, names with sexual connotations will be deleted."
If you can't argue on the facts, imply that your opponent is acting uncivil and boorish behind the scenes and your followers will be sure not to listen to the well put and intelligent responses they actually make on the blog.
He then (in what I'm sure is another crafty quiet update) added,
"It would strengthen the evolution case (instead of resorting to name-calling) to instead explain what Darwin did believe about the origin of male and female. Enlighten me.
Dimensio said, "In fact, distinct gender emerged as a result of organisms being able to reproduce through the sharing of genetic information in reproduction. Initial 'sexual' reproduction of this nature was essentially gender-neutral, as there was no 'male' or 'female' assignment because any given organism could share or receive compatible genetic information from another organism of the same species. Gender differentiation emerged as a result of specialization of this ability."
Dimensio...Can you please explain to me how you know this to be true?"
Yes, that's how Ray's big argument ends for now. 'How do you know this to be true ??'. At this point I'm not sure Ray's even heard of published research and study. Maybe that's been the problem all along, he's just not realised that people can base their views on something other than the results of a quick rectal probing.
