"The current situation in the United States and in Western Europe has nothing whatsoever to do with “free” immigration. It is forced integration [—] The power to admit or exclude should be stripped from the hands of the central government and reassigned to the states, provinces, cities, towns, villages, residential districts, and ultimately to private property owners. [—], if only towns and villages could and would do what they did as a matter of course until well into the nineteenth century in Europe and the United States: to post signs regarding entrance requirements to the town, and once in town for entering specific pieces of property (no beggars, bums, or homeless, but also no Moslems, Hindus, Jews, Catholics, etc.); to expel as trespassers those who do not fulfill these requirements [...]"
13 comments
Dogs and Sailors keep off the grass...
I see no problem with this plan to allow discrimination on a house-to-house basis. I mean, other than the Constitution, of course.
Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free...
...but only if they're just like me.
That's not constitutional:
@Article IV section 2
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. I guess you could still do it for particular towns (since such a rule would apply to both state citizens and out-of-state citizens). It would still be stupid, though. How would you even enforce it?
Wow, aren't you the perfect avatar of empathy and inclusiveness. Extrapolating from your name I guess you are german too? I'm so glad that you don't get your wish to go back to before the 19th century. And what makes you think that you would be on top in such a fragmented society in which each owner of private property would be allowed to set rules over who may cross his land? It would lead to absolute chaos! Oh I forgot, people like you always believe themselves to be incapable of ever belonging to the downtrodden, the poor, the excluded and the weak. But in the society that you want nearly eceryone would be exactly that including most likely yourself.
Those who 'worship' you were thrown out of the HTML helicopter that is Reddit.
Hopp off, Hans.
...hey, we're only following your advice. After all: did Col. Tom Parker - Elvis's manager - have the right to live in the US...?!
If deportations don't apply to whites , then you - and all your Alt-Shite ilk - don't have the right to think the way you do.
Legal immigrants have to show their tax returns. Mainly because they can . One way to find those who have no right to live in the US: ask them to show us their tax returns...! [/'Birthers']
After all, you Alt-Shitists won't care about anyone who isn't white: because one who refuses to show their tax returns - and thus prove their citizenship - is orange .
post signs regarding entrance requirements to the town, and once in town for entering specific pieces of property
YES! I have my sign right here. It reads: "fundamentalist Baptists entering this town will be shot on sight."
Sorry, you can't always be on the winning side, even if you assume you will be.
@ChrisBP747 : It’s more that he thinks anarcho-capitalism is the ideal, but until it can be inaugurated properly, monarchy, with its “innate” encouragement of leaders to favor long-term gains over short-term (because the ruler has to consider his entire lifespan, not a short few years of office), is to be favored over democracy, which is supposed to favor the reverse.
Skimming his RationalWiki entry and considering the two posts here, I’d guess that he thinks that “universal freedom” is self-contradictory; only the strong/virile/whatever have the capacity to exist freely, so they’re superior to the not-so-strong, and have the right to...dispel...such intrinsically parasitic beings. (Any inaccuracies, Pharaoh?)
@Skyknight :obviously treat it responsibly...
Also, his excuse why African monarchies and Somalia are so pointedly not properous despite what Hoppe 's beliefs would dictate is that negroids are stupid. Oh, and he's also a rabid homophobe, believing that homosexuals must be physically removed because due to being "advocates of alternative, non-family and kin-centered lifestyles".
Basically, Hans-Hermann Hoppe is the direct precursor of the Neoreactionary movement.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
