A peace deal cannot happen as long as Zelensky is in power. He will not agree to any peace agreement of any kind, as he has already made clear over the past 18 months. Every time a peace deal or even just a humanitarian proposal is made he rejects it. The Ukrainian army wouldn't even let civilians use the Russian made humanitarian corridors when Russia was taking Mariupol last year.
(...)
Well this is just false. The UN Charter has a clause about right to self-determination and that applies as much to the people of the DPR and LPR who want freedom from Kyiv's tyranny as it does to anyone else. The Budapest Memorandum clause 2 indicates that use of weaponry against Ukraine by Russia is permissible if it is in accordance with the UN Charter which as I have just established is interpretable and justifiable from the Russian perspective.

Ukraine terminated the 1997 agreement ITSELF after VIOLATING IT THROUGH THE DEPRIVATION OF DONBAS CIVILIANS' HUMAN RIGHTS so Ukraine is entirely to blame for the violation of the 1997 treaty and you have NO argument on that one whatsoever.

The 2003 treaty pertaining to the Sea of Azov is perhaps the ONLY actual point you have and it is also the LEAST significant of all the treaties in your little list.

Ukraine violated the spirit of Minsk 1 and 2 through its refusal to relinquish areas of Donetsk to the semi-autonomous governance of the DPR or demilitarize the area resulting in the DPR resuming hostilities. The DPR is not Russia, they are ethnic Russian UKRAINIAN CIVILIANS so the idea that "Russia" violated Minsk is simply ludicrous even if you were to make the FALSE claim that the DPR violated the agreement first.