“ darwins theory of mans evolution.”
I assume you mean as a coverup to hide the truth of Genesis?
That would be a pretty ridiculous conspiracy theory.
Imagine the size of it.
EVERY biologist would have to be in on the conspiracy. Sure, some biology teachers might get by without being inducted, but if it’s a conspiracy, they can’t take that chance. NO ONE could be allowed to possibly stumble on the proof that would take the whole thing down.
So EVERYONE who does ANYTHING with genetics, with biology, with disease variations, testing human medication on animals, testing human food preservatives on animals, the people doing the research that proves and upholds evolutionary theory, all of them have to be co conspirators. As well as anyone in geology. Anyone studying ice layers in glaciers. Glaciation. The age of coral reefs. bird migrations. continental drift, gloods, flood behavior, flood deposits, volcanic activity, varves, fossils, the tar pits, fossilized dino tracks, anyone digging anywhere at all where they might find an out-of-place fossil, Astronomers, people studying population curves, the historical distribution of the races, the bottlenecks, the die-offs, the jurassic, the Triassic, the Pleistocene
ALL of these people would hAVE to know the truth in order to safe-guard the lie. They cannot be ALLOWED to put the whole lie at risk. There’d be MORE people inside the conspiracy than there could ever be outside of it. So if the goal is to fool people into NOT believing in Genesis, then HALF THE FUCKING WORLD would know that Genesis IS THE TRUTH. Including the judge at Dover. The judges at every creationist-vs.-evolution court case. To make sure the right side wins.
This would take a LOT of work and a LOT of money. Would Marjorie Traitor Greene put up with secretly funding such a secret? She’d have to be in on it, too. Just in case she saw the actual budget…
There’d be five kids in Encino, and half of the evangelicals, that aren’t in on the hoax. It’s a ridiculously stupid idea of a conspiracy.
it actualy makes more sense if everyone’s sincere and the evidence is real. Dislike the conclusions if you must, butshow actual flaws in the methodology.
“
“if monkeys did evolve into humans,”
Holy crap, you pluralized monkey properly. I am stunned.
“there wouldn't be any more monkeys as all the monkeys would have evolved into humans by now”
Point to the textbook that says evolution requires the entire species to evolve?