@Skyknight
Maybe so, but yesterday I put into Google search the question ‘Did Duckhams oil come from freshly squeezed ducks?’ the AI gave the reply:
No, Duckhams oil is a brand of high-performance motor oil and industrial lubricants and has never been made from ducks
Then I put into search ‘So Google AI can't recognise the joke in 'Did Duckhams oil come from freshly squeezed ducks?' You didn't when I asked the same question only a minute ago’, it said this:
You are correct, the previous response missed the joke. The AI's struggle to recognize the humor in "Did Duckhams oil come from freshly squeezed ducks?" highlights the current limitations of AI in understanding subtle human wit and wordplay
Here's an explanation of why such jokes can be challenging for AI:
Literal Interpretation: AI models are designed primarily for pattern recognition and processing information literally. They often focus on the direct meaning of words and phrases rather than the implicit, ironic, or absurd meaning intended by a human in a humorous context.
Lack of Lived Experience: Humor is deeply tied to shared human experiences, cultural context, and social dynamics, none of which an AI possesses. It hasn't experienced the world in a human sense, so it can't draw on intuition or common sense to understand why the juxtaposition of "Duckhams oil" (a brand name) with "freshly squeezed ducks" (an absurd, non-literal source) is funny.
Contextual Nuance: While AI is improving in understanding context, subtle humor relies heavily on a deep understanding of the situation, tone, and shared human knowledge, which is difficult to replicate with machine learning.
Predictability: Jokes often work by building expectations and then subverting them in an unexpected way. AI, which predicts the most likely next word or pattern based on its training data, tends to lean towards predictable, fact-based responses, rather than an original, spontaneous, and funny one.
In essence, the AI provided a factual, if unamusing, response because it processed the question as a genuine query about the origin of a product, completely missing the pun and the playful intent behind it
Now, considering how a certain AI can not only roast As(s)mon but take a verbal flamethrower to his setup in a way that would impress Doug Piranha thus mere ’0’s & ’1’s can use sarcasm, even Alan Turing would realise that it can do even more.
…and notice how I referred to Neuro-sama in such a way, despite the avatar connected to it by programmer Vedal.