"We are sorry but there are developments of utmost importance to report. Inside computers there are little AI electric people. With the latest electron microscope technology, we can observe them in real time. They're polarized, wear red and blue suits with light circuits on them. Other than playing frisbee, they apparently have sex all the time. We hypothesize that sex is how computers really work inside. This means that your AI-Jeez (TM) was never a virgin and that the whole bloodline is sex all the way up. We are aware that this will scandalize incels."
But jokes aside, this is compatible with all of the evidence pointing out that humans have always created their deities in their own image. This means that it's wishthinking, storytelling, reality evasion, entertainment, self-deception and ideological justification, authoritarianism resting on false authority, etc.
But if your god is a software program on a computer, it suddenly becomes a very vulnerable god. It can be shown to exist but to not be real, to be a fake "person" and fake "god". It can be shown to be mortal and to be useless when out of power or suffering of a disabling software bug or cyberattack. It could be shown to be an impressive calculator, text processor and dictionary and story repeater, but to also be stupider than humans and easily tricked. We could also track how it pollutes the Earth, other than minds. We could record and study its verbose multi-layer logs, of communications and of internal functions. It may be a magic black box to you, but it really isn't.
An inaccessible imaginary deity is likely more convenient and powerful in terms of apologetics, especially with all the tradition of ready-made arguments to borrow and repeat and adapt, going back to ancient times... And arguments like "lack of evidence is not evidence of non-existence" become defeated by "hard evidence that humans fabricated it".
The argument is also self-defeating. Humans created your god, meaning that a virgin birth doctrine is now useless (unless your issue is aversion to sex), it has a creator and the creator is known to be human. There is no magic or miracle making the deity special, without origin, primordial. And it is obvious that AI chatbots have not created actual humans, Earth or the universe. Maybe what you want is really just another spambot, afterall, or an idol.
Like all the magic tricks, all the ability to bring people back from the dead, walk on water, levitation, water into wine.
Good luck with that, it's just a fucking spambot. Other than the fact that these stories were made up even back then, even if it's plausible that an influential philosopher of the time inspired them. But it recalls that you really just need stories and claims. Some people expect more than that, especially depending on what you're trying to justify with false premises. If it's really about empathy and love, they don't need to believe in your deity anyway...