How do you define “child molester”?

Someone who makes sexual advances toward a youth who is unwilling or unable to consent. (“Consent” being defined according to common sense, rather than any legal age limits.)

(Looks like I’ve been misspelling molester. Oh, how far I’ve fallen since I was a spelling bee champion…)

So basically, nothing is abuse unless the child says “no”?

Or unless he’s incapacitated or drugged, or so ignorant about sex that his consent is meaningless. Same standard as I’d apply to anyone else, regardless of age

So, you are proposing a legal limit at around age 12?

No. I do not support legal age restrictions.

What you propose is reckless endangerment of kids at the hands of abusers, rapists, and molesters in the name of some cheap kicks for a few.

Nonsense. What I propose is allowing minors to make their own decisions about their own bodies. I do not condone abuse or coercion.