Gay is communism
We have seen in the past several years under the Barack Obama (or whatever his name is) administration a militant homosexual movement on steroids, running at warp speed. Many of us have been warning you that this movement is not what it seems, what it's being sold as to the American public. While its proponents claim it is simply about gaining "marriage equality" and "civil rights" for homosexual, "transgender" and other sexual deviants, that is not the case.
At its core, this movement is about tyranny. It's about subverting the rights of people who hold traditional moral values, which are antithetical to immoral, centralized government control. It's about silencing the dissent of those who oppose the destruction of marriage and the mainstreaming of deviancy. It's about deconstructing the foundations and truths of our freedom-based, constitutional Republic. This movement's goals are in line with the goals of the communists , and I'm certain that many homosexual activists, who are only useful pawns of this movement, do not see this.
33 comments
"This movement's goals are in line with the goals of the communists"
Das Kapital. Read it and understand it, before spouting such nonsense.
You might have seen that movement, but very few others have. Maybe you ought to check the dosage on your "happy" pills?
Strangely enough, in countries where homosexuals HAVE gained marriage equality and civil rights, it hasn't moved on to any kind of tyranny.
It's not about silencing anyone, silly; you're perfectly free to spout your gibberish as far and wide as you can. But, normal people are just as free to laugh themselves silly at your reactionary ramblings. We normal people find marriage STRENGTHENING when more people are allowed to join, so to speak.
Where in the constitution does it say that if you love someone of the same gender, you ought not to have the same rights as others?
Communism: from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.
Gina, find an old-fashioned Marxist-Leninist and ask him or her about "socialist morality." You'll find you agree on quite a lot.
@ Swede
They were indeed persecuted by Stalin and throughout the existence of the Soviet Union.
There was a book by, I think, Cleon Skousen which claimed that gay rights were part of the communist agenda. And it is somewhat true; people who are far to the left in the United States did tend to support civil rights movements. But does supporting gay rights lead to authoritarian socialism? No. No it doesn't. And the fact that they have to invoke an undead boogeyman tells me that the homophobes have no arguments going for them.
Most of what's happening with gay rights is at the state level (NY, HI, MD) or through the courts (NJ, NM). Obama may support gay rights, but he's actually done very little about it one way or the other.
It's about subverting the rights of people who hold traditional moral values
Those "rights" you claim don't exist, and never have. You don't have the right to impose your "traditional moral values" on others. If they start requiring you to be a homosexual or marry someone of the same sex, then you can claim your rights are being trampled.
However, comunist countries such as Cuba ir the Soviet Union, persecuted gays as much, if not more, than the United States. Maybe the reason why is that you have no idea what communism is about?
Cuba, China, North Korea, Cambodia, formar Yugoslavos, Soviet Unión, etc.......just to name a few, happen to be or have been communist and either actively persecute or had in the past done so, as mucho, if not more, than capitalist countries. Maybe it's because you have no idea what you're talking about
Meh, the goals of communism are pretty much in line with 19th century morality, if not more altruistic. It's the execution that gets sticky.
There were no 'out' homosexuals in the Soviet Communist Party. Are there any Marxism-based parties or governments today where equal rights for LGBTQ are part of the ideology?
No-one has the right to deny rights to minorities. Same-sex marriage shouldn’t be an issue; there are no good arguments against it. How is it not tyranny to deny a right that some people not only want but require to live a better life? Would you be silent if the majority of people took away your right to marry the opposite sex?
Nobody will ever legally penalize you for opposing same-sex marriage. The consequences are purely social, and you must accept them.
Communists desire to:
1. Abolish class (no masters nor slaves).
(More information: http://www.worldsocialism.org/articles/what_is_socialism.php . Note that communism and socialism are treated synonymously.)
Many, many far-leftists support queer rights, especially today, since we comprehend it more. But many queers oppose communism because anti-communism has been thoroughly engrained into American culture.
Ma cherie may be half right! There may very well be a tyrannical movement out to destroy the foundations of a freedom-based constitutional republic.
Spoiler: It's the one denouncing deviants and differing views.
You speak of tyranny and centralised government control.
Second verse, same as the first ...
I'm a christian bigot I am,
image
image
I'm certain that many homosexual activists, who are only useful pawns of this movement, do not see this.
Maybe because it's a complete lie.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
