RE: We need a real sex offender registry
That would be a registry of all thots that engaged in non-marital sex. It's easy enough to get one off the ground, since most womb-men report their partners on social media for judgement of the foid hivemind. Since they are sex objects, it's safe to assume that all of their male "friends", boyfriends and the rest have been their sex partners.
We also need to make it mandatory for womb-men to take all the surnames of the men they have been with, one by one. This way you would be able to tell a used up cum depository by the word count in her second name and save yourself the trouble of "getting to know" a creature that doesn't even have a personality.
[…]
They would have 50 surnames on their credit card. Credit cards would be the size of an A4 piece of card.
They shouldn't have credit cards or any money in the first place, because they don't do any real work, do not generate value (except maybe as mothers in a two-parent family, which most of them are not).
15 comments
Yeah. Well, Josh Buggar has made that idea - before it even left the ground - crash & burn.
And in more ways than one.
And that's before I name the other ways which obliterated your 'Opinion' on the launch pad of FAIL. Let me count them...:
Buggargate
Buggargate II: Electric Buggarloo
Buggargate III: Revenge of the Sin
Buggargate IV: Josh's Destruction
The second in particular is pertinent: using a credit card.
The hacking of Ashley Madison's database certainly proves that certain so-called... 'men' should never have been allowed money , never mind credit cards: least of all the computers they bought with such.
...and what are on your computers' HDs which could result in your being on a sex offender registry, o manbabies?!
Nathan 'Luke O'Shite' Larson ring any bells, OP...?!
We need a real incel registry, you say shit like the above and we get to come for you, cuff you at the step of your house and take you away for forced commitment.
As for your psychopatic outburst? Who cares, you degenerates are way too impotent and powerless to enforce yourselves upon anyone else and should you try, you’ll gonna find out we already have a very real sex offender registry, one made specially for creeps and disgusting shits like you.
It takes two to tango, so apart from lesbians, it's pretty difficult to have sex without male input. Are you going to run the rooting men in as well? Talk about sex crime 1984!
He is another pathetic whinecel, but it reminded me of an old radio comedy, where the actress playing Elizabeth Taylor introduced herself by the list of all her married names. "This is Elizabeth Taylor Hilton Wilding Todd Fisher Burton Burton Warner Fortensky."
It takes more than one person to engage in non-marital sex. Males should have a registry for them too. Men should be virgins before marriage and be faithful husbands.
For example, Laura Lee checks up on her fiancé, Chad Cad:
Lost virginity to Mrs. Robinson when he was sixteen.
Had passionate affair during the summer with Stacy Malibu. He was seventeen.
Slept with Pixie, Dixie and Trixie during his college years.
Had one night stand with Becky the waitress when they were both drunk. He regrets this because she doesn’t meet with his high standards.
Slept with Polly Pureheart, his sister’s babysitter. She was fifteen.
Slept with Lucy Lee, Laura’s younger sister, three times after he and
Had one year affair with Laura Lee, his former fiancée.
I can’t understand why they logically would hate “easy women” since they would actually raise their chances to have sex, apart if they just want to control women. And what about the men they slept with, apart if you merely see them as unwitting pawns of these “Jezebels”?
@JeanP #109812
Logic is not the incels’ friend. In their world, the existence of promiscuous women does not raise the likelihood of an incel having sex. Because women can automatically tell if a man’s an incel, and will turn him down. (usually because of the shape of his jaw).
"That would be a registry of all thots that engaged in non-marital sex."
Once more, sex requires two people. If they're both consenting adults, it's not an offense to have sex. Maybe if one or more is cheating on a spouse. But that's between them, not a 'sex offender' status.
What you're really saying is to punish women who are willing to have sex, but won't touch your winkie if you paid them. And this is WHY no one is touching your winkie, idiot.
@JeanP #109812
yeah, I don’t understand Incels hatered for female promiscuity either. I mean, if they desperately want to get laid, wouldn’t creating a society that shames women for promiscuity make their situation worse (since obviously the more selective, the less likely they are going to be selected)? Meaning that, if anything, they should advocate for a society, that shames women for not sleeping around like wild?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
