FSTDT

Maria Kuhl #transphobia #magick #crackpot thinkspot.com

Capricorn is the sign that rules the father. Cancer opposite Capricorn rules the mother. We learn gender roles from our parents, so Cancer and Capricorn are the signs that rule gender roles. Since 2008 we have seen the madness of trans ideologi take over the world and the erosion of safeguarding for women and children with men in drag insisting that women give up their rights to single sex spaces, and insisting on drag queens access to children. When Pluto went through Cancer between 1914 and 1939, women started wearing trousers and entered the work force, in part because the men were being killed in war. War is ruled by Aries, the sign 270° from Cancer. The sign 270° from another sign tends to have an oppressive influence on the sign in question, and when Pluto went through Cancer we had WW1 and the whole buildup to WW2. When WW2 broke out, Pluto had just left Cancer and entered the sign of Leo. The sign 270° from Leo is Taurus, the ruler of survival, and it was very difficult to survive for a while.

[...]

Pluto enters Aquarius in March. Over the next year it will retrograde back into Capricorn twice, but from fall 2024 it will stay in Aquarius until 2044. Aquarius rules the revolution and science. When Pluto was in Aquarius the last time between 1778 and 1798, we had the French Revolution. Aquarius also rules seperation and a lot of people were sadistically separated from their heads under the Reign of Terror .

The sign 270° from Aquarius is Scorpio. Scorpio rules genitals and surgery, reproduction (immortality) and death, power, destruction, and sadism. The last time Pluto was in Aquarius Marquis de Sade (born while Pluto was in Scorpio) published his books, and the paraphilia Sadomasocism is named after him.

So what will the next 20 years bring? Will genital surgery become the biggest oppression? Reproductive technology is ready to replace women by 2030 as Matrix looking baby factories are being made so that drag queens can make their own babies to tell stories to.

snowlord #fundie #pratt thinkspot.com

Dawkins muses: “Living things are not designed, but Darwinian natural selection licenses a version of the design stance for them [oh, that’s very generous of it!]. We get a short cut [one has to pick up that he is being sarcastic here] to understanding the heart if we assume that it is ‘designed’ to pump blood.” So, au contraire, the heart just by chance grew to be a pump – for no purpose whatsoever, mind you – because, well, “accidents happen?” Why didn’t it “accidentally” grow to be, say, a waste-disposal site, a pulley to hoist objects upward, a bone-assembly plant, a poison-producer, a … (fill in the blank)? Fancy that: it just so happened to coordinate its development with that of blood! And in cooperation with an enormously complex circulatory system of a myriad of blood vessels needed to make blood useful for tens of trillions of cells, missing none! And miraculously timed to receive electrical signals from some clump of gray stuff in the head to make the fool thing function on a timed cycle of beating! And choreographed with these things called lungs that provide oxygen and remove carbon dioxide to make blood relevant at all! And a handy stomach to supply nutrients that blood can then transport to all parts of the body! And a shell of skin to keep that blood from squirting out into space! We simply ought to give evolution an advanced degree … probably even the Nobel prize for physics and chemistry. Wow, I’m impressed!

The very thought of all this super-massive, simultaneous accumulation of hyper-intricate operations … and the blasted thing dies in the end? What’s up with that? Why all the convoluted bother? If there’s no “purpose” or “design,” what’s the point? Well, of course there can be none. We are fooled to think there must be a reason, and we live our lives as if they have some ultimate meaning. What a bunch of rubes we are! For all the ultra-intelligence of evolution, funny that it should, by luck of the draw, slap together humans as dumb idiots, which is really weird, come to think of it, given our astounding IQs to “design” astonishing technology ourselves … for alleged “purposes” (ho, ho, ho, what dupes we are!). Teleology is an unwelcome guest who simply won’t leave the party.