@KierHamm

Anonymous #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

When a woman's offspring is a male, her genetic interests instantly lie with males, even if she has female offspring. Most conceptions are male, but births are relatively equal due to high rate of malformations in male embryos (they self abort at high rates). Males are more damaging and expensive to gestate. Male babies are more needy, emotional and angry. It's an ultimate sunk cost. Mothers also instinctively understand that in order for her son to win, women must lose - even the most feminist mother in the world will shriek about the epidemic of false rape accusations the moment her semen demon assaults someone at school. Ironically, mothers and grandmothers of boys live shorter lives because they too become worthless and expendable in the eyes of natural selection.

If that didn't sound bad enough, boymom brains are literally colonized with male DNA containing cells. It's uncertain whether the presence of that DNA alters their behavior, but cellular level "warfare" isn't unheard of - the father's fetal DNA "fights" the mother for more resources during pregnancy, for example.

Fun fact: when the male fetus is about to be aborted (spontaneously or surgically), it immediately releases colossal quantities of male DNA into the woman's bloodstream, as a last ditch effort of sorts. Because most of them are aborted spontaneously due to fatal deformity, a question arises about the presence of genetically diseased male DNA in parous women.

Anonymous #sexist #homophobia lolcow.farm

(...) the idea that men under "patriarchy" are encouraged to display "positive masculinity" in any way. That is a mystification designed to dupe you into thinking that you're getting something in exchange for feminine deference, which leads many radfems to conclude that "gender abolition" can be made palatable to men and pro-male women if only they offer something like "you stop murdering and raping us, I pick up the check at the restaurant and let you wear my pantyhose". They will never accept your "deal" because men run the show. They're not really "forced" to adhere to any standard in the first place and there is no punishment for deviating from it, it's all a sham. They'll sell you movies portraying "women and children first" as they drown them to save themselves. "Valor" in war isn't a thing, and neither are knights in shining armor. Males habitually use "feminine" emotional manipulation and heartstring pulling to maintain dominance, and always have. You're not offering them anything they don't already have full access to.

This is one of many fallacies of "gender abolition" - the one where self proclaimed "gender abolitionists" actually take "patriarchal" descriptions of gender roles at face value, and (again, not insult) I would probably blame autistic tendencies here. In practice, the only rule of "patriarchy" and "masculinity" is that there are rules for you and no rules for men, which is why I reject these words in the first place - there is only male dominance/parasitism. Trans women are the most glaring example of this. If tomorrow you proclaimed that men no longer have to be GI joes, they'd find a way to have a higher social standing than you by being wailing loser faggots. And it would be entirely at your expense.

The idea that some silly, jaded straight women are delaying this "gender abolition" by expecting some nebulous "effort" on Valentine's day rests upon the assumption that "masculinity" is what it says it is. It's not and it never has been.

Sapphoetia #transphobia tumblr.com

š”–š”“š”¬š”Æš””š”°

I.

& I CURSE

II.

THE tRaNsGeNdEr LeSbIaN

III.

WHO READS THIS HOPING FOR A CRUMB OF POETRY

IV.

TO SOFTEN THE LANGUAGE

V.

DESCRIBING HIS MASTURBATORY PROJECT;

VI.

I CURSE THE MIMIC, THE WEARER OF SKINS, THE MALIGNANT AUTOGYNEPHILE,

VII.

THE ā€œTRANSSEXUALLY CONSTRUCTED LESBIAN FEMINISTā€

VIII.

THE PORN-ADLED HENTAI FREAK CLAD IN SLOPPY APROXIMATION OF HIS OWN EX GIRLFRIEND DEMANDING ENTRANCE INTO THE SKYCLAD RITUAL

VIV.

LIKE HE DOESN'T KNOW.

X.

HE KNOWS.

š”“š”žš”¤š”¢

MAY LESBIAN ARTEMIS STRIKE HIM DOWN

š”Žš”«š”¦š”¤š”„š”±

MAY LESBIAN HECATE SNATCH HIS SOUL

š””š”²š”¢š”¢š”«

MAY THE GROUND NOT RECIEVE HIM.

SO BE IT.

Kasira #sexist tumblr.com

Do not feel bad for women with children, they are simply being punished for the crime of being mothers. There is no excuse, there is no justification, they made a selfish choice and now they must pay for it.

#anti natalist#anti natalism#circle of life

Anon #ableist #sexist lolcow.farm

image

[ TRANSCRIPTION ]

Autistic women vs autistic men's areas of special interest

vintage fashion
radical feminism
classical literature
web art
psychology
jigsaw puzzles
cottagecore
mental health awareness
-
school shootings
hentai
4chan
the alt-right
incel killers
Chris Chan
autogynephilia

Anonymous #transphobia #sexist lolcow.farm

Technically, trooning out is often a result of self reflection. The part that's missing is drawing a logical conclusion from it, which can't happen because of the reproductive niche a male evolved to occupy. If a male completes the process of self reflection, he will not engage in male-typical sexual behavior. That makes the trait self-eliminating.

You may have noticed this already. A male grows up watching his mother get abused by his father, perhaps getting abused himself. He feels bad for the mother, pities himself and acknowledges that his father was wrong, yet eventually becomes an abuser. A male is a pillar of the community, kind and charitable to everyone including children. He is also a pedophile. A male would kill any male hitting on his 13 year old daughter, yet his hard drive is full of jailbait. A male understands that pregnancy is painful and destructive to the woman, and feels bad for his wife. He still wants heirs.

A male's observation that he needs to hurt others to fulfill his reproductive program, logically, should result in him ceasing the program. And perhaps it did in the distant past, but that trait by definition mostly died off. This predicts an existence of some kind of a neurological "switch" in the mind of a male that prevents him from internalizing his own awareness of male harm. Studies showing previously rape-condeming males increasingly justifying sexual violence and rape myths as their own arousal increases are consistent with this hypothesis, as well as the established male tendency to externalize.

Sure, a number of TIMs most definitely troon out as a premeditated means to min-max their current place in society. But some can be expected to troon out as part of the mechanism described above, especially given their higher exposure to observations of male harm via news and social media, as well as some extent of public condemnation of it. The sheer number of born-again coomers, deadbeat husbands and pedos who troon out at the most opportune moment can reflect either scenario. Male harm is increasingly more difficult to compartmentalize or launder away, but self-elimination from the gene pool via suicide or celibacy is not optimal.

The true horror of moidry is the fact that even if they genuinely want to stop being what they are and doing what they do, they can't. There no other way for them to exist.

Trustyourperceptions #crackpot trustyourperceptions.wordpress.com

Human males are also believed to block gene Igf2 in human females (De Sousa, Rosalind Institute, Scotland). Males block parthenogenesis in order to make females make males. (Trust will explore parthenogenesis and the origin of maleness in the next set of posts). Males are genetic parasites, possibly having originated as parasitic DNA or an infectious genetic virus (noted by French biologist Claude Combes in Parasitism: The Ecology and Evolution of Intimate Interactions), or later, simply by mutation (see geneticists Sykes, Jones or Graves). Maleness appears to have evolved on Earth independently at least three times (but probably many many more, and most likely in different ways), yet maleness as a biological strategy is the same: intercept femalesā€™ power of generation and harness that power to perpetuate yourself. Parthenogenesis ā€“ life without males ā€“ was once the norm (and for some species, still is). Mammalian females, though blocked, though now incapable of successful parthenogenesis, have not yet lost this genetic relic.

professionalexpert7 ; Glitterloveangel #crackpot reddit.com

the ONLY reason women do not self conceive, is the DNA from her father's side blocking her natural ability for parthenogenesis. The y chromosome has hijacked the genome in order to force women to make men. This goes hand in hand with that information, lots of quotes from scientists, info on dermoid cystic growths which are really embryonic growths, with hair, teeth, in some cases almost complete skeletons, that are stopped in their tracks from developing into a parthenogenic birth by DNA inherited from her father's side.

----

I know Iā€™m very late to this but I was wondering about your opinions on why men exist in the first place? It is a fact that in the beginning of earth, women were the only ones who existed and they kept the human population alive by self conceiving. We donā€™t need men. But why do they exist?

I feel like someone messed with Mother Nature and now weā€™re paying the price for it.

Anon #sexist #racist lolcow.farm

Pinkpill here.

Feminism is an inherently western, individualistic, Enlightenment based ideology. I'm going to blow your mind here - technically there can't be any 'nonwhite' feminism because the interests of one's race and tribe are inherently irreconcilable with the interests of women as individuals, because family and all of its surrounding structures innately require female mules. You acknowledge this when you complain about black men/ankhs building black community/identity/self worth on the backs of black women. This isn't a bug, it's a feature. If you want to uplift a nation in any sort of tribal struggle, this is what you have to do. There is no way to support female liberation whilst simultaneously elevating the status of men in your group as compared to men in other groups. In the end you're spending your resources to help advance a man in a male hierarchy. It's unfortunate and I can sympathize with the double bind to an extent, but I have long abandoned the idea that helping women also helps the men (along w with other silly idealistic stuff like 'having it all' and 'teach boys to respecc wamen').

If you're not prepared to be childless/tribeless/identityless and family-less, anything you do will benefit men at your (or other women's) expense.

[...]

Men's issues are not women's issues, but intersectionality aims to obscure that. Being forced to balance the interests of women with the interests of men due to a common group descriptor inevitably results in incidents like not wanting to give up R. Kelly because he's giving more status to the community as a whole. Black men could enslave all white men tomorrow and it would make absolutely 0 difference for black women, except maybe a consolation prize of being sexually valued above white women - a goal that's inherently nonfeminist in the first place.

Anons #sexist lolcow.farm

> Men arenā€™t fully human. They obsess over specific scenarios of putting their dicks into holes and if they canā€™t, they become simultaneously catatonic and in a state of psychosis. Imagine living half a century and the only thing you think your existence is worth is a few minutes of hookup sex. Iā€™m so glad I wasnā€™t born a man nonnies. Itā€™s an existential nightmare imagining yourself as being physically human without a human soul.

> There really is nothing there.

Trustyourperceptions (radfem) #sexist trustyourperceptions.wordpress.com

A female who makes a male is making war for females. A female who makes a male becomes the means by which males war against females. A female who makes a male, however unintentionally, is enabling and continuing and even improving malesā€™ war against females. She is ā€œhelpingā€ males become ā€œbetterā€ and ā€œbetterā€ rapists; she is ā€œhelpingā€ males become more formidable. ā€“ The diving beetle, for example: Even though the female tries to avoid males/rape by diving underwater, the male still dives after her to try to grasp/rape her. Females in turn evolve altered dorsal surfaces, making it harder for males to grasp them underwater. But the males who ā€œovercomeā€ this female morphological defense will do so through ā€œimprovementsā€ ā€“ having better graspers, being the biggest males, etc. ā€“ making them even more hellacious rapists, ā€“ which the female will be forced to perpetuate, ā€“ inadvertently bringing a new level of hell to other females.

Anonymous #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

Do men want to be raped? Absolutely. Do they show it by writing trashy ā€œromanceā€ novels? Not usually. Their expressed desire for becoming rape victims can be literal and obvious, but most of the time, far more subtle and psychological, and it bleeds into almost everything they do or create. Every time man puts pen to paper, when he ā€œexpressesā€ himself, he is crying for rape in some way. Nietzscheā€™s works are more salacious than anything booktook has to offer when it comes to how much the author suggests a desire to be raped. Thatā€™s pretty much all of them.


Anonymous #sexist #transphobia #psycho lolcow.farm

I remember arguing with a nonna on here who refused to believe me when I say that males ultimately crave to be raped.

I would even say that misogyny, at its core, is a manā€™s rebellion over the fact he isnā€™t worthy of rape, and his jealousy over women because thinks they are.
For troons, the solution is retarded yet fairly straightforward. He becomes rapable by becoming a woman. He becomes worthy. He is more worthy the more he can prove he is rapable, the more he proves he is a woman. Notice how TiMs only complain about being TiMs because when they feel unsexy (unrapable). Notice how TiMs only brag about being TiMs when they feel sexy (rapable). Even when theyā€™re ā€œcomplainingā€ about ā€œbeing rapableā€ (literally), itā€™s a point of pride. Humble bragging over being ā€œforcedā€ into sex work and getting ā€œunwantedā€ chaser attention, giggling and blushing over ā€œvalidating misogynyā€ from ā€œTIRMsā€. In fact they even invent lies about lesbians and TERFs wanting to rape them, because thatā€™s the best marker of success he can think of.
Moids are driven to create the conditions that best resemble him being raped. Since itā€™s impossible to command a womanā€™s will, he can never make her think ā€œI want to rape himā€. Typically, he substitutes her want for her need. He forces women to accept his role as ā€œthe providerā€, and her helpless to resist. He fabricates the conditions required for a woman to depend on him for her survival (staying alive, since he canā€™t barter with his worthless gametes), where the default is for him to depend on her for his survival (reproduction). She now needs him, instead of him needing her. His power and resources become his coveted fertile womb. Heā€™s necessary. Heā€™s important. Heā€™s so important and so necessary a women would die without him (heā€™ll make sure of that!)
His insistence that he should be rapable bleeds into all that he believes, or wants to believe. His sense of self, his ego, relies entirely on his ability to trick himself into thinking he is rapable. He wants to feel raped even while he is raping. The woman/child seduced him. She was asking for it. No, demanding it, and since he is helpless to his lust that she controls. She basically raped him.

It all comes down to rape, which is to say, being so necessary and important you inspire a want so commanding that others must take.

87dvhnk #sexist tumblr.com

All mothers, and motherhood itself, are evil. Women are just like that; it isnā€™t any degree of artificial psychosis. ā€œRaise my children for me (for free) or Iā€™ll kill them to spite you. Iā€™m so oppressed.ā€ No one feels more entitled to female labor than another woman. (Feminists love to play dumb about ā€œthe community of caregiversā€ being coerced or else forced [girl children, impoverished women] female labor.) Of course, no one gives a fuck about the child/children, the only victims, who did not consent to be born.

Anonymous #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

Freud externalized, like all males do. He may have briefly stumbled upon the truth but his ego defenses made him pretzel it into a convoluted cope. His initial work was on CSA and pedophilia, which likely made him unable to separate his observations from his core male self somewhere down the road, this prompting the testerical "NO ACTUALLY ITS THE CHILDREN WHO PROVOKE THEM REEEEEE" pivot he became famous for. Fundamentally, a man cannot face who he is - it hurts too much and "kills" his false self. This is something all the women who believe in changing men need to understand.

A male is incapable of accountability because guilt and self awareness interfere with his most basic evolutionary function - take stupid risks until he either reproduces or dies. That alone requires self deception and grandiose delusions.

You will frequently see shit like serial killers trooning out, pedos age regressing, etc. That is typical male convoluted guilt-dodging - to ward off the realization that he's a piece of shit, he will scrap his prior self entirely and try to become someone else, typically a member of the group he wronged, which is supposed to enhance his delusion of innocence. He, of course, won't stop the behavior he is trying to dodge the guilt of, because he is unable to. He'll just use the mangled split identity to "okay" it to himself while mitigating guilt and shame. This is the kind of deranged mess that happens inside men's minds.

Anonymous #sexist #psycho tumblr.com

I truly believe every moid in existence should be raped at least once. I know it wouldnā€™t make them reconsider their actions, but theyā€™re way too comfortable seeing rape as some light crime like stealing and not a literal violation of oneā€™s humanity just because it mostly happens to women/girls. Or god forbid ā€˜destruction of propertyā€™ if the victim already had a boyfriend/husband/father.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Most of you need to understand that moid wants are not logical if you zoom out. Moids evolved to have wants that only make sense in the short term because they are disposable. The moid's short term interest is monopolization of mates, and everything that appears to be "reasoning" in a moid is a mere post hoc rationalization of base short term instincts. It doesn't matter if eventually he'll have to resort to inbreeding to keep the guaranteed wives flowing, or that all of his epik chad son lineage will be deformed and uncompetitive in the long run. It doesn't matter that the moid will eventually die in a war as a result of society that he created. Because of lower offspring investment, the long term welfare of said offspring (and by extension society) simply isn't part of the moid's program on a purely biological level.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

one could crudely summarize every source of human misery as a byproduct of abstract intelligence - namely, an ape being forced to spectate its own animal nature, in particular the awareness of sex and death. esoteric christfags may begin orgasming about the apple of knowledge symbolism here females, being more robust, default, multi-purpose units, are capable of denying animal nature (such as opting out of sex and pregnancy) to some extent, thus managing at least one terror. males, being built for one purpose alone, can't. a male's life therefore defaults to being forced to spectate his own objectively vile, antisocial sexuality, violence and infinite greed - things he knows to be bad because he'd hate to be on the receiving end of them, things he builds laws around condemning - but being unable to stop himself from acting on them, which causes the male to churn out unfathomable amounts of neurotic cope to resolve the moral conflict. the bulk of humanity's cultural heritage practically oozes with this, most instinctive male politics do as well (the perennial idea that it's the other, differently colored males that do bad, vile male- i mean, SAVAGE AND BRUTISH things), even dumb little memes like "post nut clarity" (the brief moment the ape is rightly appalled by the evil it just fapped to) or realizing that your daughter is about to deal with people like you doing to her what you did to her mother.

imagine being a cancer growth with a brain, knowing that you'll kill yourself if you get what you want, but genuinely having no other means of existing, so you have no choice but to antagonize your host. this is what the "male psyche" is. another, late stage form of their neurosis is a delusional, grandiose fantasy of infinite purity and freedom from desire (easy to find in any religion or monastic practice), which usually follows after they pig out on cake too much.

Anonymous #transphobia #homophobia lolcow.farm

The same reason even cis gay moids sometimes give up and marry their faghags for end of life comfort. A male is parasitic. A femboy and a cis male = two males. A parasite cannot parasitize on a parasite.

Even if you weren't a delusional bricky shim and were actually a young cis woman with a dick looks wise, you are simply not a suitable host. You're a man - psychologically externalizing, unpleasant, aggressive, non-nurturing, egotistical, impulsive and devoid of self awareness - you are not equipped to absorb the impact of another male's incessant testeria. Contrary to what femboys commonly believe, you cannot anticipate another man's needs just because you're a man yourself - no man wants to deal with men's bullshit and that's the reason why there's no worse punishment for a moid than to be confined amongst other moids. It doesn't even need to be mentioned that you're a flagrantly mentally ill man, with levels of batshittery vastly exceeding standard male levels - any real life union between you and another man will blow up in mutual homicidal ideation or bug chasing within months, if not weeks.

Your meek whining on Twitter doesn't mean you're "submissive" (aka caring and self sacrificing) in the sense women are - you're just a weak, petty omega. Cishet moids grow up being coddled, first by their mommies and then by a myriad of women they're surrounded with - they know a man will deck them in the face instead of lovingly tard wrangling them for years. This is why, regrettably, a moid will always choose the ugliest possible cis woman over you.

Valerie Solanas #psycho #sexist www-khoury-northeastern-edu.translate.goog

Prior to the institution of automation, to the replacement of males by machines, the male should be of use to the female, wait on her, cater to her slightest whim, obey her every command, be totally subservient to her, exist in perfect obedience to her will, as opposed to the completely warped, degenerate situation we have now of men, not only not only not existing at all, cluttering up the world with their ignominious presence, but being pandered to and groveled before by the mass of females, millions of women piously worshiping the Golden Calf, the dog leading the master on a leash, when in fact the male, short of being a drag queen, is least miserable when his dogginess is recognized -- no unrealistic emotional demands are made of him and the completely together female is calling the shots. Rational men want to be squashed, stepped on, crushed and crunched, treated as the curs, the filth that they are, have their repulsiveness confirmed.

The sick, irrational men, those who attempt to defend themselves against their disgustingness, when they see SCUM barrelling down on them, will cling in terror to Big Mama with her Big Bouncy Boobies, but Boobies won't protect them against SCUM; Big Mama will be clinging to Big Daddy, who will be in the corner shitting in his forceful, dynamic pants. Men who are rational, however, won't kick or struggle or raise a distressing fuss, but will just sit back, relax, enjoy the show and ride the waves to their demise.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Do not believe anything men say about anything. Fundamentally, the male is a selfish creature whose only sense of right and wrong is entirely informed by ā€œwhatā€™s best for meā€. At best, he will entertain himself with ideological musings, but will not apply these beliefs to himself if a beneficial opportunity arises that demands his non-compliance (most rape is opportunistic, for example). They have no principles, no sense of morality, just a set of gambits he employs in hopes of getting the most for the least effort. When they play at being arbiters of reasoning and morality, I can only roll my eyes. The sex who must be constantly and continuously instructed and corralled in an attempt to dissuade their rape children, to varying degrees of success, has no business standing on a podium to lecture anyone on whatā€™s good and bad. They obviously lack the hardware required to possess an innate sense of decency, dignity, respect, and excellence. Itā€™s like asking a robot to describe what it means to be human. They can spit out a rehearsed reply, and it may even be agreeable at first glance. But there is no foundation, no substance, no ground in reality, no through-line. Just a calculated output based on what he thinks he should believe, or rather, what he thinks you want to hear. Worse than a robot, who is entirely without motives, the male exercises an attempt to maximize his own benefit, often to the detriment of others. But I digress.
Thereā€™s no such thing as a man who believes in something for its own merit. Even if he were cognitively capable of such an abstraction, the benefits of doing so are preemptively trashed as soon as women are involved.

Failure to thrive is so endemic to the male mind, the discard process is mostly unconscious. Pruned, cerebral garbage, flushed down his spinal column to be shit out, and destined to wallow in the eternal sewer that is male potential. Any and all profound male thoughts serve only as heavy slag to fill the bottom of a septic tank, so that his sperm may one day spill over and escape.
If his ā€œmoralā€ argument is reasoned to lead to womenā€™s further accessibility, itā€™s not ā€œmoralā€ at all, itā€™s a gambit. He sees a crack in the cement shit drum and scrambles towards the light by dumping more shit.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Moid psychology and their relationships with women all stem from their envy and self hatred. They hate so much that they need us, but they won't let us go. They can never be free and actualized individuals separate from women because they literally can't be. Their egos won't allow it, and even if the could manage it would all be for naught since the parasite will die without a host. Monks dedicate their entire lives freeing themselves from their male obsession they have towards women, and for their efforts they will die alone without any progeny. That's why misogyny always manifests as women being controlled and enslaved, never simply absconded or abandoned (like misandrist are towards men). They need us and they hate that they need us. Deep in the most ancient and primal part of their brain stem is the need for us. They want us to pay for how much they need us, because it's just not fair.

Anon #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

A moid is just a primitive, defective parasitic machine who wants the world to be free and open for him to indulge. Free and open, but only for him. Because this would never manifest without him first being anointed ā€œgodā€ of reality (the whole universe agrees he is the main character), he is just an angry, confused, ineffective thing. He has to come up with strange coping mechanisms to explain the incongruity between his idea of the universe where he himself is god, and the real universe where he isnā€™t.
Compartmentalization is one of these copes. Where he rightfully assesses that the outside world constantly denies him, so he makes an ā€œaltā€ mode in cases where he sees he can take/indulge. When the conditions do not exist for him to successfully benefit from his ā€œaltā€ mode, it also doesnā€™t exist. Seeking sex (goon alt), seeking connection (yearn alt). The post nut-clarity phenomenon they speak of demonstrates this very clearly. Itā€™s a total alt shut-down, tied to a very specific material condition (arousal vs refractory period).

Anonymous & 1yyyyyy1 #sexist #crackpot #god-complex tumblr.com

(anonymous): you said men are genome recombinants i truly felt like my third eye was blasted open. yeah, that's literally just what they are, it's their evolutionary purpose. and people can argue that the existence of both sexes hinges on sexual reproduction, but it's so abundantly clear that females are the original blueprint, what the species would look like if only asexual reproduction existed. the smaller gamete only exists to give up its genes, the egg provides the mitochondria, the fertilized egg is the cell we start out as. if the y chromosome and sry gene doesn't activate, the fetus grows into a female. we are the blueprint and they are the variation.

(1yyyyyy1): Going to use this as an opportunity to disclose my unconventional view of the situation we are in. Humanity the way it currently is is an infestation of mutated sex-crazed females that women nurture out of pity and God knows what else.

Anon #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

The moid is a gooner until he is a lovesick yearner. He is never himself, who is both at the same time.
Moids go into like fugue states where they are either porn-manic degenerates or self-pitying ā€œI missed out on highschool loveā€/ā€œI would marry that cashier and bleed out on the streets for herā€. If you catch him fancying either state, he denies the existence of the other. Itā€™s Schrƶdingerā€™s moid.
This is why they say retarded shit like ā€œonly men are capable of real unconditional loveā€ while also saying the very next day ā€œall men want is sex, they donā€™t care about women as peopleā€. He may sincerely believe heā€™s not lying when he does this, because he is cognitively impaired. Part of their brains seem to affectively shut down and reactivate whenever it deems necessary.

Kawaiigardenerwolf #sexist #psycho tumblr.com

I only slaughter my male animals. I'm not trying to be a better feminist, I'm trying to be a better misandrist.

(just kidding, I slaughter the males because if you let them get too numerous and too old they will try to rape the females to death. There have been times I had to slaughter males even when I had a 10 to 1 ratio because one scrote animal picks a favorite female to torment. Also the females just aren't as good for meat unless you are talking something like a hog.) Unless he's a bird of paradise or some other sort of animal where the female can just outright reject your sperm, the moids of the species are just obnoxious, parasitic terrorists. I personally wish some sort of apex predator existed that would occasionally pick off the worst of the human frontpoles.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

This is why fatherhood is another example of those artificial meme performance niches that men have carved for themselves in order to appear essential. A father isn't actually doing anything important or irreplaceable, but you are tasked with pretending that fatherhood does something sacred. Of course if you ask people to specify what it is, it's always abstract immaterial nonsense like "having a male figure in your life" or "authority". It's never anything with immediately evident utility like cooking, cleaning, providing, caretaking, gestating or nursing.

This is the nature of a male. If he can get away with getting everything and giving nothing, he will do just that. If he can get away with cheating, he will cheat. The only factor he considers is whether he'll get caught and lose his main relationship, nothing else. There is no such thing as a man who goes on a business trip, gets approached by a woman and says "sorry, I'm married".

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Women are not responsible to train worthless sperm wagons to mimic human decency. The best and most moral thing to do when confronted with selfish, exploitative sperm wagons is to just let them wither and die alone. You donā€™t train a parasite to not be one, you take away its blood supply and let it die. The parasite is gone, and has none to replace it with, making another ā€œresponsibilityā€ (burden) for women in the future.

[...]

Heā€™s operating on selfish scrote logic, you and her operating on wishful-thinking mommy logic. Scrote logic trumps your mommy logic because his is the logic of a parasite, and yours is that of a generous host, trying to compel the parasite to kindness by offering your hide. Lmao.

[...]

Jesus Christ, how horrible. Sperm wagons donā€™t even deserve to be pissed on when theyā€™re on fire. Look at you, both of you, giving him everything. Itā€™s a crime against nature.

Anon #sexist #psycho original.lolcow.farm

I think children and the mentally retarded can be "groomed". Adults with sound intelligence should know better should they not? If women had the mentality of not allowing grooming and not allowing it to proceed in the first place in their own cut off personalized lives, and not trusting males it likely wouldn't be a thing right? How many women groom other women?; It's negligible. This is a massive blackpill if women stopped participating in trafficking it would cease to exist overnight. If women spoke up about grooming more and spoke honestly about it that males are predatory, and that grooming victims are retarded women with pickme brain rot being taken advantage of until it was something recognized by ape law, formally it may have the slightest bit of a punishment and deterrent for groomers and maybe these idiotic women who are groomed and victims to their own pickme programming would see it as a bad thing. But evidently most women don't see it as existing, consider males more valuable as groomers, or that it's not important enough because it only affects retarded women who put themselves in dangerous situations who have pickme brain rot to trust predatory rape apes. This is similiar to how the rape of partners is seen legally in honesty by males, where women are blamed for trusting apes because they should know better than to trust apes. Even man made law admit this caveat; if you trust rape apes you shouldn't be surprised when the ape rapes. Men admit this and remind women of this, men make any protection from them illegal or difficult to reach yet women still trust them. That's pure brainrot and masochism. If you want to call this slut shaming or victim blaming, sure. Sluts deserve to be shamed for their own masochism and you can't really be a victim if you've chosen to go down with the moid rape chimp ship, I'll remind that I'm only talking about women who are raped by their own trusted ape partners. An adult woman being "groomed" which I suppose is code for made into a brainrotted prostitute is incredibly pathetic, especially in a developed economy with safety nets.

Pass-da-baton #sexist tumblr.com

The vast majority of women are already living in their ideal world and in a self-imposed situation as close to their ideal life as possible. From gathering what libradbihetfems are lamenting about online, it's clear that all they want are some upgrades to the status quo. Some of which include:

being able to score a reformed moid her looksmatch who can give her lots of orgasms so she doesn't have to fake it anymore (source: online radfem whining) get the 1% of men that wear dresses to stop doing that because deep down she loves the gender dynamicbonus points for making single people subsidize child care costs and society coddle mothers even more than it already does

This list is obviously non-exhaustive. The point is I will not be lifting a finger for any of these causes. To radfem guilt tripping tactics like "the married normie woman that volunteers twice a week at a women's shelter is doing more for feminism than YOU", my only response is--Good, exactly as I intend.

#blackpill feminism

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Be mindful of male PR and the limitations of your female perspective. You may genuinely be appalled by inequality, but he isn't. A sperm cell doesn't want sexual reproduction to cease, it just wants to get to the egg first. Males are designed for competition and rat racing, it's why they exist.

Any woke male is simply upset that he's not the top dog. Moids are not capable of truly despising hierarchies as a concept, they can only be resentful of their failure to thrive in them. Any 'theory' produced by them is simply an extended rationalization/PR.

Every mama's basement revolutionary wants to be the white capitalist republican pig Chad who gets to reproduce with white bitch Stacy. Because he secretly admires Chad yet desires Stacy, his anger will be reserved for Stacy whom he perceives as reserving her resources for a better male. She symbolizes the fact that he will never advance enough among other males to be selected by her.

In general, anger is a pretty good indicator of desire and deprivation in males. They always hate what they can't have, it's in their nature.

Elemental witch #sexist elementalwitch.wordpress.com

Men are a plague. They are biologically mutated females which have infiltrated every facet of life on the planet and infected it with a dis-ease. Patriarchy is a system which ensures males the ability to impregnate females against our will, thus forcing us to proliferate more males. This is the behavior of a parasite on a host. Patriarchy is the word to describe a global parasitic infection in which males are the parasites. Everything they latch onto suffers and slowly dies in agony, including women, animals, and the Earth, while men pursue their primary goals of survival via maximum energy consumption, expansion, and replicating themselves as many times as possible.

A parasite does not care if it kills the host, because it can just move on to another host. Women are the primary hosts of male vampirism, and our life force is sucked out of us to generate the fuel men need to further exploit and dominate the Earth.

I know, I know. Misandry.

Anon #sexist #transphobia lolcow.farm

Because all men by design have mommy issues, perpetually avenging a trauma inflicted by something known as "maternal omnipotence". All males resent it, but women don't due to their ability to become mothers themselves. Most of what we define as "masculine identity" is just a set of pitiful exercises at establishing oneself outside of mommy's oppressive power. Predictably, everything about this particular LARP revolves around men defining themselves entirely around women and "not being women" as though they ever could be them - another "a-actually I'm choosing this, it's not like I CAN'T do something you can" cope. [...]

You can't help but notice the obvious pussy envy and desire to switch places - males want women to be the easily coomditioned, expendable, sex addicted ones - groveling before the more valuable set of gonads. The ressentiment and envy of a disposable ballsack thus culminates in trooning out. Is it really surprising how obsessed AGPs are with the "mommy" narrative? AGP is the absolute pinnacle of male coping, something that's usually followed by surrender and death.

Males have no sexual fantasies, all they have is predictable eroticized copes. You can coom-meme them into anything including killing themselves, if you push the right buttons. They're not people, they're a malignant growth around their semen pustules.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

[ Refering to Lundy Bancroft's "Why Does He Do That?", a book about tactics used by male abusers ]

lundy bancroft's book is brilliant, but it understandably doesn't explain why in a more global, all-encompassing, elegant sense. his book, as it should have, still left the nebulous possibility of "good men". a proper framework should explain why a value judgment like this cannot apply, that there's only a man that finds it useful or has the capacity to be abusive, and a man that doesn't.

--

their nature innately biases them towards perceiving prosociality/kindness as deference/submission. in a male mind, there's no need to be nice unless you have to be, and that can only happen because you're too weak to just take what you want. no matter how many phony layers of civilization and decorum they slap on top of this, even to the point of losing their own acute awareness of it, it still shines as bright as day and is most noticeable in pre-socialized males (toddler to elementary school age). they absolutely hate dealing with this between themselves of course, but they don't have the capacity to change even for their own sake - let alone women's. for a male, might is right.

ironically, by being staunch blank slatists feminists have lost their only ability to fashion males into the most convincing facsimile of a "good person" possible - removing any and all material power they hold over women would give them a selfish incentive to be nice (display submission).

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

1. What males say they want and what they really want are two really different things. Pickmes never win.

2. Males' stated demands and standards are a) coping mechanisms of an inherently defective individual or b) attempts to dupe you. They know that they're using you and they will despise you for letting yourself be used. They are aware that their sexual role is inherently parasitic and destructive, so they are organically unable to respect women (or other men) who give in to their demands. In mammalian reproduction, sperm is the worthless gamete while the ovum is rich in resources. Due to this, males universally understand being given reproductive opportunity as a form of loss on the giver's part. Any claims otherwise are an attempt to negotiate a better arrangement (in which a male provides nothing in exchange for some abstract immeasurable benefit like "romantic love" while calculating the fuck out of cost/benefit on his end).

Anon #wingnut lolcow.farm

another subject you have been taught your whole life to feel uncomfortable about is fascism, the first political movement in the 20th century to unapologetically demand equal rights for women, female political representation, and the improvement of womenā€™s socio-economical, intellectual and moral condition.
all scares about fascism are pathetic: there is no fascist movement today, because there is no genuine mass-feminist movement today. fascism preaches the subjugation of big businesses under the state, in service of the state, the rules of honor and dignity, and meritocracy, above the rules of money. which party in the world is trying to accomplish this? maybe the CCP if we wanted to be lenientā€¦
there is a strong hunger for ā€œfascismā€ in most people, even if the word itself is taboo, and this hunger is exploited by politicians and billionaires for their own benefits, without ever even trying to satisfy it, just as there is a true hunger for feminism that no one wants to satisfy.