I call “bullshit” on it being non-violent, before having read the rest.
And, there, in the very first policy, what do we find, but VIOLENCE!!!
If you pay incels of both genders to date, will you stop paying once they are no longer celibate?
Yah know, there are already women you can pay for a “date”, and you will stop being -cel, right away. As you refuse to take this way out, you are all volcel (except the ones who can’t afford it).
What is the limit of being “poor”? Have you checked how much the administration costs, both for handing out the dough and for determining who’s poor and who isn’t. In Sweden, we have a child-benefit, paid out for each child each month. It has been determined several times that the sum saved by not giving it to the rich would barely (or not at all) cover the costs for the administration determining who’s “rich”, and to only pay everyone else. But, we’re just 9 million people; it’s probably a whole different thing in a country with 320 million people (assuming they mean the US).
Suicide is legal, to my knowledge. You can’t put people in jail for having killed themselves. Or, well, you could do like they did in Medieval times, and dump the corpse outside the cemetery, but the deceased won’t notice.
Nobody cares one iota about other people’s “sexuality status”, everyone just assumes that everyone else has done it. There is no incelphobia.
There is phobia against violent misogynists, but that’s has everything to do with the violence, and nothing to do with the celibacy.