No, just conservatives.
"For the record, Mr Bakunin, the words you are repeating are the answer to a specific question of what I thought the writers of LEGEND OF KORRA were thinking when they decided to use lesbians rather than male homosexuals as the couple of choice in a children’s cartoon to lure innocent and trusting kids into believing homosexuality is right and normal and ergo Christianity is wrong and abnormal."
The whole thing comes off as projection really: https://obsidianwings.blogs.com/.a/6a00d834515c2369e201b8d0fe24dc970c-popup
Really he thinks everyone thinks the sane as him, but are lying about it.
"He is asking why Leftist activist in the media think their audience is more accepting of lesbians. And here is the first part of my answer that was edited out:
"I am not sure, but I have a theory:It is because the two sexes differ.Lesbians in fiction look like Asami Sato, young and pretty. Even guys who have no fetish for seeing pretty lesbians make out understand their attraction to each other, because we also are attracted to pretty girls. It does not trigger a puke response. Woman also can look at female beauty and see it, that is, see the beauty.The reverse is not true. Men abhor homosexuals on a visceral level. While girls sometimes are attracted to them, they tend to be ‘bishounen’ rather handsome, if effete, men.So a man who is attractive is attractive for his spiritual qualities of leadership, manliness, courage, and strength, even if his face is as pretty as that of Humphrey Bogart, who turns out to be homosexual is neither attractive to a male nor to a female general audience.In any case, I have never heard of a group of women descended on a lesbian couple and beating them to death with axhandles and tire-irons.""
He leaves out the last line: "but that is the instinctive reaction of men towards fags.""
"I do not hide the fact that a visceral abhorrence to homosexual acts (albeit never to the person tempted toward such acts) is a rightly ordered and indeed a laudable reaction. All emotions, visceral or otherwise, should be ordered as nature and reason command.
A person who feels casual toleration of pederasty, bestiality, necrophilia, or other acts of wrongly ordered sexual passion, including sodomy, indulges in feeling that are not laudable. Such alleged toleration is in truth a slothful indifference toward what should be a matter of zeal. A wife who tolerates her husband’s mistress desecrates her marriage. Toleration in these cases is a sentry who sleeps at his post.
Whoever feels sex is sacred logically ought to feel the perversion of sex to be a desecration. What one tolerates to be desecrated, one holds not to be sacred.
Do I feel this visceral abhorrence? No, but I wish I did; for whoever loves a man hates his sins; whoever loves the sin hates the sinner. If my love for these sinners were not lukewarm, my hatred of this sin would be as hot as the wings of charity could fan the flames. For this flaw of mine I pray to be cured."
He then says it was just satire in the comments, but acts like no one would believe him:
http://www.scifiwright.com/2015/05/more-accusation-now-with-less-proof/#comment-2691599087
