Many people here are not realistic about things like the Greater Male Variability Hypothesis or the necessity of stereotypical masculine traits like mathematical aptitude. If we were as talented as scrotes, why would they even continue to exist?
Even blackpilled women let their ego get in the way of acknowledging this. I am willing to recognize every uncomfortable truth about my own gender if I can use that knowledge to figure out my next moves. Because they seem to be more heterogeneous, we should prioritize targeting the most inimical ones:
Scrotes with an IQ above 100, or maybe even any scrote with an IQ above 85. Obviously some unintelligent scrotes can be surprisingly efficient in their carnage, but they are at least predictable. I find most female serial killers to be a snoozefest. I'm more of a mass killer than a serial killer person.
Scrotes born after 1980, with increasing emphasis on the youngest. Old scrotes will die sooner and require less attention to manage.
Rich scrotes. There are an estimated 10-20 million USD millionaires in the world, and scrotes are the majority of these.
Physically fit scrotes, especially martial artists. Laws don't matter when you are alone with those creatures.
Women here downplay the importance of stereotypical male talents and pretend they only have value enforced by androcentrism. I LOL at women thinking we need to avoid the tech industry because it is infested by nYggers. We act like we are so scared, but we sure don't act desperate. I would spend 16 hours a day digging trenches and doing construction work if it meant we could be truly independent. Feminists don't even think about hardware. Who among us can operate a semiconductor fab?
We need to be more desperate.