radical_freedom & kwallio #sexist #transphobia saidit.net

RE: I’m starting a private discussion group for biological essentialist, intersectional, antinatalist female separatist radical feminists who have studied & are continuing to study rf theory. There will be a screening process in order to join. If you are interested, please DM me.

Platform will be off Saidit and will require nothing more than any throwaway email address in order to participate.

Thank you

Edit: this is not a space for mothers of sons (“boymoms”). sorry not sorry 🤣

The term biological essentialism does not mean what you think it means. I think what you are referring to is just biology. Biological essentialism is the idea that women are nurturing and should only occupy nurturing professions like nursing and teaching, etc. Trans advocates misuse the term all the time but I don't think feminists should adopt the trans terminology. They've conflated biological essentialism and biology because the term biological essentalism has become a no no, what they are talking about is just simple biology.

Actually, I am indeed familiar with the usage of the term in the way that you are describing, but radical feminists who are biological essentialists in the sense that I mean will understand my post, so I do not need to clarify. We understand each other.

If you continue to use the term as the trans activists do you are simply helping them. Why do this?

worried19 #kinkshaming #sexist saidit.net

RE: Why do feminists love bdsm and sex work so much?? How someone can be this brainwashed to not see that this is opressive to women??

I don't understand how women can want to be beaten and degraded and dominated by men. Do they really hate themselves that much? Do they consciously view themselves as inferior, or is it all subconscious? How can you date a man who beats you and calls you filthy names and believe that the same man actually loves and respects you? I just don't get it. And most of the women who are into this shit weren't raised watching men beat women. So they have no excuse, in my opinion. Abuse survivors are one thing. But the women who were never hurt or touched by anyone in childhood or adolescence have zero excuse to encourage others to abuse them and call it fun and normal and healthy.

Women in BDSM do not automatically get assigned some passive role by the BDSM community.The disparity is somewhere else: more people prefer passive roles. To understand BDSM you'd have to first acknowledge that this is an affinity to certain sensations people experience involuntarily. I've whipped both men and women, and - apart from minor physiological differences - both react similar and both physically and mentally ENJOY what I do. As long as you view BDSM as an extension of abuse or rape, instead for what it is, you actively keep yourself from any chance of understanding it.

Given that these are your beliefs, I don't see how you can consider yourself a radical feminist. That's all I've got to say.

Why would me being a BDSMer negate my radical feminism? The radical feminism I live, respects the aspects of people they can't and need not change. I can't change the fact that I am female any more than I can change the fact that I am a BDSMer.

I mean, radical feminism opposes what you are doing. I don't want to get into some big argument about whether you were born that way because I highly doubt you could be convinced otherwise, but the stripe of feminism you're claiming to follow doesn't match with that belief.

imafreespirit #crackpot #sexist saidit.net

In a fair world, men wouldn't be able to be nowhere near women as they are now

I took animal science classes at uni, and let me say it: if things were ideal, men wouldn't be able to live close to women. 1. Males are pretty useless, they don't serve any other purpose other than impregnation so that we can carry babies, and one man can impregnate many women, but a woman commonly can have 1 baby, so from the start women should outnumber men, patriarchal countries like China and India who have more men than women, they're stupid, having more men means more crime, more theft, everything more bad shit. 2. Men's desperation to invade every single female-only space, because they know they are not needed, not so many of them, they force their way in women's lives by sexist laws, religion, shaming, capitalism, violence, politics, marriage(what other animals from opposite sexes live so bounded to each other more than half their life, it's unnatural af). All their effort wouldn't be needed if submissiveness was natural to women, but it's not, because if it were women would happily accept it but women are not happy about it, so the effort to subdue us is constant and this has been shown for centuries, men are not needed, that's why they try so hard to make themselves relevant to women.

Happy_face_caller #sexist saidit.net

Rant: I’m always seeing posts on WGTOW saying go to PinkpillFeminism if you want to complain about males, but then 1/2 their posts/comments are about hating on males.

So help me understand how we are the dumping ground catch all space for ranting about males, but literally declaring We are going our own way away from males isn’t going to have some overlap hating on males topics?

Just chuckling at the axis of hypocrisy here.

I think our conversations are much more nuanced and fact based, and one could argue equally proactive.

Anyone else notice this?

Maryam #sexist saidit.net

Why do men despise feminists who hate men when the hatred for men is an intrinsic part of the female experience?

The hatred, the fear, the bitterness, the anger, the dread, the horror, at and towards men will always, and has been, an intrinsic aspect of womanhood till the dawn of humanity to the end of it. Every single woman in this planet has had a moment in her life when her dislike has overwhelmed her and driven her out of the bullshit and lies she tells herself.

Hatred of men wasn't a movement in the 20th century - my Pakistani conservative mother, my Pakistani conservative friends, my radical Muslim female acquaintances, all dislike men. Every single one of them. We avoid going out at night because we're scared of men. We don't piss off men because we're scared of them. We tell ourselves that "boys will be boys" because we know men. We yell at and create drama amongst other women because we do not have the emotional strength to do it against men. We serve men, we live with the systems men created, we normalize male violence, we protect ourselves from men, because men inconvenience us, and we know it. They inconvenience all of us.

Most women do not get angry at men - they cry or accept it. Every single woman in the planet knows men are different, but she copes and copes and fucking copes with bullshit upon bullshit till she takes her final breath with a good amount of delusion - but with the incapability of believing it completely. Feminism is simply addressing the elephant in the room. All women are wary of men. All women are inconvenienced by men. All women dislike men.

Oogabooga #sexist saidit.net


Inceldom is a cult. If you’re romantically / sexually desperate please read the following in order to protect yourself

It’s really sad how this cult-mentality has found a home online. And make no mistake it is a cult:

⁠Most if not all new entrants have come to them feeling desperate (with life in general or over something specific)

⁠Day 1 of being “accepted” into the cult is to have what little self worth you have left crushed by other members under the guise of “delivering the harsh truth” or even trying to “”help”” them.

⁠Isolation. The founders or longer standing members will ensure the new entrant never strays from the confines of the cult. Claiming to “””open their eyes””” to dangers that all conveniently exist outside of their group.

⁠Dependance. They will then make sure that you reject any form of help that is not exclusively provided within their walls. Berating therapists as ineffective is a popular narrative for cults to jump on since what constitutes effective therapy can vastly differ from person to person (not helped by the fact bad therapists sadly do exist)

⁠Preaching. Once you’ve internalised all of the toxic views of the cult they will then remind you of the “good” they’ve done for you and really make it hard to say no when it comes to returning the favour. This will usually manifest in reciting the cults beliefs now firmly ingrained to other desperate souls for the cycle to repeat, and for the cult to grow

People NEED to be able to identify these steps as it just makes me sad to see what can start as innocent desperation to be warped into hateful preaching (and much worse).

If you’re at all sexually / romantically desperate, I do not judge you for feeling the crushing weight of loneliness but PLEASE don’t ruin the potential for things to get better by buying into this manipulative group of cult-leaders who would sooner incite violence in their “lower ranking” members than actually do anything themselves. They do not care about you outside of what they can do unto you and get out of you. You are worth more than this community ❤️

TL;DR: Screw Cultcels (aka all Incel “communities”)

I can’t tell if you’re shitposting or literally retarded. But basically all of that is bullshit.

1. Telling people objective facts is no more soul crushing in this instance than in any other. If men are disadvantaged in the dating market, then why should they be deluded into thinking otherwise?

2. “Isolation“ is a meme at best. No one is forcing anyone to stop interacting with the outside world, many members have active social/career lives, and there’s nothing stopping anyone from logging out of their account, otherwise all these “ex incels” wouldn’t exist.

3. Dependance? We mock therapists because it’s retarded to think one can even begin to change all the external things that are wrong. Even the few “good” therapists only give the generic advice, many of us can’t afford it in the first place. Shit, many of us even encourage those who are able to go and get cosmetic surgery, since that’ll still at least assure you tangible results unlike (((therapy))).

4. Preaching? None of us spout any more rhetoric than what’s already there, if anything we have discussion regarding ways to cope with this shithole life filled with norm scum. And our so called “cult” wants nothing from its members, there’s no financial motive save for hosting websites, there’s not even anyone forcing us to stay. Users openly condemn fakecels and tell them to leave. If you wanna leave incel forums, just brag about all the Stacies you bang regularly.

Tldr: screw soyciety (aka faggots like you)

RaptorInMotion #crackpot saidit.net

Is the history of the human race being told as a particular "narrative" and anyone who goes against it is labelled "misinformation"? Are we all actually descended from one "creator civilisation"?

All religions/followings/cults and their holy texts point to the same actual people, with the same actual story, just with their own cultural understandings and names given to them. These people were worshipped "as Gods" and over time, each original cult/following/clan/religion became fractured and multiple gods/leaders were worshipped over each other, possibly due to rapid expansion of territory and so multiple wars were waged against each other.

This all depends on whether you think "The Lost Book of Enki", translated from the 14 Sumerian Tablets, can be trusted or not.

This of course will lead to the author, a guy called Zecharia Sitchin, being dubbed a "fraudster" by a guy named Dr. Michael S. Heiser, who set up a website DEDICATED to proving him wrong and sullying his name. Suspicious in itself, but who knows.

Of course, you have to make up your own mind, so i certainly recommend reading the book. We've all got the time right now anyway!

-------------------------------------------------------NOTES OF INTEREST----------------------------------------------------

NOTE: "--->" = gave birth to/descended into.

NOTE 2: None of these people are "THE God Almighty" that supposedly created the physical universe, even they say they didnt know. They only gave our ancestors "consciousness/awareness" of "our universe".

NOTE 3: This is not a fully completed list of EVERYONE borne from eachother. This post would be impossibly large to try and fit them all in, but I can try.

NOTE 4: When researching each "god/deity/leader's" story and the words/passages written about them, try and remember that they are written down/spoken in 'LAYMANS TERMS' by VERY early man, using their (naturally at the time) limited understanding of what they saw and were told. They also learnt within the confines of their own cultures.

NOTE 5: It appears the earliest forms of class divide, family interbreeding and slavery were prevalent in these times, as a sort of "necessary evil", and actively encouraged by certain civs/cults/clans. Possibly for control and most likely for "royal bloodlines" to always succeed. These potentially gave way to the earliest forms of apparent racism far down the timeline, and the uprisings/rebellions against it.

NOTE 6: The Great Deluge/Biblical Flood/Legend of Manu/Gun-Yu/ Deucalion.

NOTE 7: Pizzagate, Epstein, Adrenachrome, Moloch, Secret Societies, Hitler, JFK, 9/11 etc.

NOTE 8: The Aztecs were annihilated by Spanish Conquistadors for not "following the narrative" of Christianity.

-----------------------------------------------------FAMILY TREE/CULTS------------------------------------------------------

Earth, under the "overall rule" of:

An also known as: Anu/El/Ahura Mazda/Brahma/Uranus

And his people = ("Anunnaki" also known as: Titans/Neteru/Angels [on Earth]) + ("Igigi" also known as: Grigori/Watchers/Nephilim/Fallen Angels/Demons/Olympians [on Mars])

And his land = [Nibiru also known as: Sirius]


The first leaders/gods/deitys, 3 of which (Enki, Enlil and Ninmah) were directly borne from An:

Enki also known as: Ea/Nudimmud/Ptah/Shiva/Iapetus and his original "civ/cult/clan" in The Abzu, in Eridu, + Memphis also known as: Mena-Nefer

And his offspring/avatars/forms = (Ningishzidda also known as: Tehuti/Thoth/Kulla/Prometheus) + (Marduk also known as: Amun/Amon/Aton/Ra/Ravana/Rudra/Menoetius) + (Nergal also known as: Erra) + (Adapa also known as: Adam/Hanuman ---> Ka-in also known as: Cain, and Abael also known as Abel) + (Ziusudra also known as: Utnapishtim/Noah/Manu/Vaivasvata/Deucalion ---> Shem + Ham + Japheth ---> Ashkenaz) + (Dumuzi also known as: Tammuz) + (Gibil also known as: Gerra)

And their lands = [AFRICA] + [ARABIA] + [GERMANIA] + [ASIA]

And its offshoots = {Dogons?} + {Israelites}

"vs / with"

[A LOT more insane genealogy equating every god with every other god]


Shamgaz also known as: Samyaza, leader of his rebel "civ/cult/clan" at Mount Hermon And their offspring/avatars/forms = And their lands = "far east, lands of high mountains" [CHINA/RUSSIA?] And its offshoots = {Scythians?}

-------------------------------------------------------END FEELINGS----------------------------------------------------

Are "they" still possibly vying for their "divine" right to rule the Earth's lands, and its subsequent peoples?

All of this could mean/imply that each leader/god/deity had many names throughout his "longer than usual" life (the gift of "immortality"), given to them by each culture/civilisation, and its people, over time.

With certain parallels to todays "cult behaviour" and mass population control by our super nations and/or secret societies, i think its PLAUSIBLE.

The "Unifying" Logo of all civs:

image[A collection of various depictions of religious imagery from various cultures depicting humanoids holding pairs of various, usually oblong, objects or animals, one in each hand. All of them are labelled with country of origin and “GODSELF ICON”.)