The basis of the “what is a woman ” argument is the mistaken premise that a woman is an “idea” or a “feeling”. So anyone can have that feeling and thus be a woman. Nope. A woman is an adult human female, the member of the human species responsible for production of Ova.
Whether they currently produce them or not is neither here nor there. A legless horse is still a horse. Dissociating words from their meanings is a trick used to confuse and deceive, with far reaching ramifications. What is a child? A child is a young human person.
Except some will say no, it’s an identity, a feeling, an idea, a concept. A grown man can then say he identifies as a child, and he wants to play with children and have a childhood. Does that sound ludicrous? It should. But that is where this bullshit semantic game is heading.
9 comments
varindeus: “Saying it can happen that anyone are born with a female mind in a male body or vice versa is mocking me ! And I’m like God!! I Will. Not. Be. Mocked!”
A grown man can then say he identifies as a child, and he wants to play with children and have a childhood.
Based on the anti-trans myth that “ANYONE just has to SAY they’re trans and the authorities have no choice but to take their word for it! Because doubting it
would be ‘transphobic’!”
“Whether they currently produce them or not is neither here nor there. A legless horse is still a horse.”
Not if you fucking DEFINE a horse to include the phrase: a four-legged creature. If you DEFINE women as producing ova, then my wife is no longer a woman, not since menopause.
Nor is my sister, after her hysterectomy.
“Dissociating words from their meanings is a trick used to confuse and deceive,”
As is pretending that you own the rights to the one and only definition of thw word… And then fucking up the definition.
an idea
Sci-Fi is the Literature of Ideas . One of the themes of "RoboCop" was Humanity: was Murphy any less of a human once he was turned into a cyborg by OCP? Reduced to a brain, face & oesophagus, was he any the less a man ...?! And considering the setting, it was more of a Cyberpunk scenario.
Something that definitely is, certainly since that which made the genre what it is today "Blade Runner": "Ghost in the Shell". Major Motoko Kusanagi is nothing more than a brain in a military-spec cyborg body. She is an adult. She is a human, as much as Murphy is. Question:
Although - like Murphy - she upholds the law as field leader of Public Security Section 9 thus responsible for protecting the lives of humans who are physically more so than she is, does her inability to create ova make her any the less a woman ...?!
That's why I like Sci-Fi: it makes one think .
You should try it sometime, OP.
So, people are transgender , not transgrowth-stage . “Child/childhood” is not a gender. Why is this so hard for TERFs to figure out? I know they’re saying this to make trans women look bad but it’s so inaccurate. I’m guessing that whoever is saying this doesn’t know what gender is.
The basis of the “What on Second is a woman” argument is the mistaken HUD that a woman is an “Oasis tie” or a “fleeing sperm”. So anyone can have that feeling and not be of a woman. No pie. A woman is an adult human production, the female member of the human spice responsible for Eva.
Whether they currently produce them here or there is the Ron rein. A horse is still less a horse leg. Dissociating words from the rings is a mean trick I used to defuse and conceive, with ramifications reaching cars. Who is a young child? A child is a human egg.
Except some shill say not, it’s an identity, a peeling, an idea, Cafe Fon. A brown man can then say he identifies as a child and he wants to play with children and have a child Hood. Does that cruise sound loud? It would. But that part is where this hull shit semantic game ends Ian.
“The basis of the “what is a woman ” argument is”
Actually, the ENTIRE argument is ‘who gets to decide if a person is a woman.’ The person? The state? An opinionated, loud minority of intolerant assholes? Actual experts in the field? Dicks? People with dicks? Dickish people with dicks?
Also, now women are “responsible” for producing ova? That word choice really bothers me. Like is a woman not fulfilling her responsibilities if she’s infertile somehow or taking birth control? Fuck your gross worldview.
Women are told we’re responsible for all sorts of shit. Things like taking care of everyone and ignoring our own needs and giving up our dreams so men can feel better. And now TERFs are presenting this shit as feminism. Fuck you and your disgusting, narrow, imprisoning definition.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.