“mans logic is flawed because when used does not always produce accurent results or truth,”
I love being lectured about logic from someone so clearly in over their head.
Logic is a tool for evoaluating ideas.
Not really a source of knowledge, more a way to organize the knowledge we already have and see what it says.
“ you cannont always reason things correctly.”
Well, clearly you cannot, either. But it’s a far cry to get from ‘logic is limited’ to ‘logic is flawed.’
"example: we say the butler killed mrs smith... but actually she died of natural causes...”
Well, WHY did we say that the butler committed murder? Was it logic? You haven’t shown logic to be flawed, here. Maybe the logic was fine, but the inventory of facts was incomplete? Maybe the person using the logic was incorrectly trained in logic. Maybe someone dreamed that GOD told him that the bulter did it, and he just CLAIMED to have reasoned it out.
There’s a reason courts rquire evidence, not just a logical argument.
"you see we can reason and detuct and think all we want. but that wont always produce the truth.”
I don’t see that from your examples. You’re just BARELY dressing your scenario and claiming it’s flawed logic. My logical evaluation of your argument is that it’s low on specifics and big on assumptions.
"this is probably the best reason as to why its flawed. it doesnt help the fact that we cannont tell truth from lie in and of ourselves.”
No. No, that does not mean logic is flawed. We may be applying it wrong, or you might be a braindead fuckknuckle.
Demonstrate an ACTUAL flaw in ACTUAL logic and see how that works.