“Science is a mess. Things are supposed to be done by the scientific method, but they are not.”
RIGHT off the bat, I’m thinking you’re a creationist and you don’t really know what the scientific method actually is. Let’s see.
““Delivered unto me,” get it? Satan is the god of worldly authority. Any time two people allow a third to tell them what’s what, that is a source of authority and Satan owns it.”
So, the logical fallacy here is not argument from authority, or argument from respect for authority, but quite literally demonizing authority.
But you’re quoting the Bible and telling US how to interpret it… THat would make you a biblical authority, no? And thus in thrall to Satan, you hell-bent fuck.
“Our academic system is descended from Akademos, … Practical knowledge was left for tradesmen and servants.”
Yes, at that time, the learned felt that the truth could be sussed out by learned men thinking with each other and found the idea of experimentation to be beneath them.
We don’t think that way, now.
“So when you talk about “hard science” you are talking about the output from this bunch of pagan worshippers making up stuff in their own heads and calling it science, while insulting and rejecting people who work by observations and tests, as required by the scientific method.”
COmpletely fucking wrong. By ‘hard science’ today we literally mean things that can be demonstrated with experimentation and repeatable observations. Computers, combustion engines, heavier-than-air flight, aging geologic strata.
“Examples abound of authorities commanding people to believe made up nonsense.”
Sez you, the Satanic authority figure.
“About half of everything we think we know about the universe is based on dark matter,”
Half? Show your math.
“The other half of everything we think we know is based on expanding universe theory,”
Half, again? SO, you’ve got two ideas you disagree with and they’re each half of all modern science. Convenient.
“All of science is muddled by such silliness.”
And I should believe you because…?
“And if you challege any of it you get personal insults in lieu of actual science.”
Do you have actual science to ‘challenge’ any of it? Or do you just criticize it as if you know what you’re talking about? Because if it’s the latter, I think I know why you get personal insults.
“But to give a straight answer to your question, iot’s because people don’t read the bible.”
Or, read it and dismissed it as an unsupported, just-so origins myth.
“Bottom line: hard science is neither hard nor science. It is a bunch of lies promulgated by the Satan’s church, the one we call “academic”.”
That’s an adjective. Wouldn’t we call it ‘academia,’ instead?
You have no understanding of anything you’re talking about.