new

Demons Deceive

A systematic effort by demons to penetrate the souls of Americans stems most likely from the pit of Hell, the head of a leading Christian institute said. The attacks have been traced to Satan in the state of California, and the techniques used make it appear unlikely to come from any other source than the enemies of Christ, said John Smith, the director of the JIGROP Institute, an education and research organization focusing on salvation of souls.

"These demonic attacks come from a group with intense discipline. No other organization could do this if they were not a spiritual organization," Smith said in a conference call when announcing a new education program.

In the attacks, Smith said, the perpetrators "were in and out of consciousness with no apparent errors, and created an obsession for sin in less than 30 seconds. How can this be done by anyone other than deomonic forces controlled by the Evil One?"

Smith said that despite what appears to be a systematic effort to target liberal Democrats and hypocrites in varioius Christian groups, defenses have remained weak in many areas.

"We know about major penetrations of politicians in key cities," he said.

Security among private-sector casual Bible readers may not be as robust, said Smith, because "they are less willing to use their faith to resist spiritual attacks."

Smith said the strategy preferred by typical Christians appears to be to downplay the attacks, which has not helped the situation.

"We have a problem within millions of souls that have been terribly and deeply penetrated throughout the United States -- and in most nations of the world ... and we've been keeping it secret," he said.

"The ones who benefit most from keeping it secret are the attackers."

Although Smith said the demons probably have not succeeded in overcoming people of true faith in Lord Jesus Christ, who are accustomed to fighting off bad thoughts created by negative thinking, it is possible they compromised "extremely sensitive" inspirational information.

He said it has been documented that messages from prophets have been ignored, misunderstood or simply rejected due to ignorance brought about by deception.

Famous Spiritual leaders confirmed earlier this year that Christian websites are probed hundreds of times a day by demon-possessed Antichrist supporters, but maintained that no real harm has been done in their struggle to destroy the Kingdom of God.

Supporters of the JIGROP campaign have code-named their newest effort against Satan "Jesus Power" and have made some strides in counter-hacking to identify their humans enemies who are aiding the attackers, Smith said. This was first reported by Reality magazine.

Smith said a series of attacks on Music City Revival and the Elijah Jesus Club reported earlier this year may have been started against other Christian organizations, but they seem to be using different techniques.

In most nations of this world, Smith said there are some areas of improvement on the side of righteousness, because prophets are starting to fight fire with fire. But Smith argued that "the fundamental error is that our spiritual security strategy has relied too much on our own strength instead of leaning upon the power of our Maker."

It seems that even a few of those who claim to be Christians are not able to distinguish parables from fiction or polls from deception.

[After starting a thread on <a href="http://www.christianforums.com/t2377830-quote-mining-no-fact-stating-s-j-gould-essay-disclosing-the-debacle-of-darwin’s-ev.html" target="_blank">Stephen Jay Gould's essay Opus 200</a>, the <a href="http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_opus200.html" target="_blank">essay's source</a> goes offline a few days later.]

What a Co-ikeedink! Today, Gould’s Opus 200 is Apparently No Longer Present on Web.

This thread is related to the thread— Quote Mining? No, Fact Stating. S J Gould Essay Disclosing the Debacle of Darwin’s Ev,— due to associated reference materials that have been discovered to have been subsequently removed from the web.

After a year of visiting this reference of S J Gould’s Opus 200 Essay on the Web, <a href="http://www.stephenjaygould.org/libr...ld_opus200.html" target="_blank">http://www.stephenjaygould.org/libr...ld_opus200.html</a> [link is broken, that's how it appears in the post] , still active just a couple of days ago when I posted the thread,.."Quote Mining? No, Fact Stating. S J Gould Essay Disclosing the Debacle of Darwin’s Ev" —.today gives this reply upon request for accuse —The page cannot be displayed.

What a co-inkeedink. This may be part of the magic of how evolutionary information—.can appear—and then just—.disappear—. all based, of course, on its validation or invalidate of the desired conclusions and perceptions that are desired to be presented—. Zap, Zap —its like reading a story about Harry Potter.

You don’t suppose there may have been same ‘persuasion’ applied to — make it disappear. No,—of course not, this couldn't be based on the coincidence that the site may have gotten several hundred hits, or more, during the past two day and its publisher may have received some negative responses as a result of its content.

Why that’s unthinkable. Such a notion would be preposterous. It’s a universal and well known fact that the evolutionist community is far too fair and objective about the issues relating to the subject of evolution to ever dream of selectively screening any information on the subject from easy access to the public.

They are much too open with all information whether pro or con as its applies to the subject of evolution. Why the record of their balanced public educational policies stand as a living testimony of that fact? Surely evolutionary web sites would not censure information perceived to challenge any aspect of evolutionary credibilty.

Before today the page was found ‘occupied’ through Google, Stephen Jay Gould Opus 200 or equivalent. The choice displayed is —. Stephen Jay Gould, “Opus 200,” 1991. If you locate another copy of Gould’s essay Opus 200 on the web, not evolutionist commentary about the essay, (they're still there) or if this site comes back on line let me know. I’ll be very surprised to get many takers for that request from the evolutionist group —.