top

Anon #transphobia #sexist #homophobia lolcow.farm

Trooning is the peak expression of men being unable to face who they are. There's a reason why it happens in spaces most exposed to feminist narratives.

When confronted with too much proof repeatedly, a man will literally chop his dick off and identify as not male before he allows himself to even briefly perceive the vulgarities of his nature. Then he will continue practicing them in their most flagrant form, thinking he's no longer doing those things because he's a man. It may work, briefly.

Similarly, male-abused male children do not grow to hate men, they either grow to hate women or become pseudohomosexual.

Anon #homophobia lolcow.farm

Male "sexuality", specifically the way coping sexologists, lesbians, faghags and other spiritual fujos envision it, isn't real. It's transparently a product of conditioning, as corroborated by the fact that paraphilias are predominantly found in men. Most male wholesome hekin gay animals are simply engaging in mounting for dominance. It's amusing but watching the "men will fuck anything" crowd abloobloo the moment you infer that males are not capable of an ironclad unquestionable biological "sexual orientation" the way normies envision it. Much fanfic cope is then employed to explain all male sexual behavior that doesn't align with muh unshakeable innate male sexuality - that gay who fucks women is only using women or self harming because of h-homophobia, his heart is really with penis! And that burly macho man who has brosex is just looking for physical relief, he's not really gay! Actually wait, no, he's really gay but doesn't identify as such because homopopia! You hate lesbians because women are suddenly exactly the same as men in sexuality of all things! But also objective sexual behavior is the absolute measure of sexuality in women! Etc etc etc. The more simple, elegant conclusion here evades them, because both sides have emotional investment in the idea of some kind of male "permanence".

> No, you were never straight. You were never gay either. You're just a meat coom-automaton driven entirely by stimuli exposure and availability, nothing more. No more "-sexual" than a beetle fucking a bottlecap is a "bottlesexual". No straight men in prison.

Anon #transphobia #sexist lolcow.farm

image

This is gendie ideology. Male fantasies now divorced from their (incorrect) biological rationalizations. The false female supplicant, now a categorization open to any man who masturbates to the idea of being desired for indiscriminate sex (that’s a great majority of them!). The false male deity, a creature with exclusive claim to autonomy, now a categorization open to any woman who sees herself as not just an object to be acted upon (she’s right, but for the wrong reason).
Built on false pretenses, both material and abstract. The male never truly becomes a female, annd neither the female becomes a male, despite their insistence and performance. The evidence of reality emerges every single time. Allowing delusions to inform your perception of reality makes you unfit and mentally disturbed, as any inability to accurately process reality would. Misogyny is mass schizophrenia, only accepted because the schizos (males and the women not yet in a position to disagree with them) benefit from enforcing their lies on others. It’s religious. Living in a lie can only give you so much. No one is truly happy, because true happiness is only found when living in authenticity. But, if living a lie means a man’s sperm can more reliably land in a hole, to him, it’s worth it. Males are willing to die to meet that end, inducing schizophrenia in himself and others, as well as and killing and enslaving the most of the race is a small sacrifice in comparison. According to him, at least.

Anonymous #sexist lolcow.farm

image

The christan bible we have today is the scrote bible. Its stupid and makes no sense. The bible is a huge wall of moralfagging and shit. It was written for scotes by scrotes and does not hesitate to shit on women and call them "naturally evil hoes" every chapter.
But we all know men are truly the evil ones. Everything bad and evil is done primarily by men. Like 90%. Women are the only ones capable .of empathy and being moral. The empathy part in a males brain is very underdeveloped and small. They needed that room to think of the coom and to do mental gymnastic moral fagging when they rape a dog or something.
Men are not humans. I belive women are the true humans. A human being has: empathy, morals, self control, beauty, respect, and a soul. Men have proven time and time again that they have none if this, or at least a shallow version of it.
Men are demons who crawled from hell and tricked us into believing we are evil hoes that need to be controled. They then wrote some bulshitt book to justify our opression even though They KNOW its retarded and wrong. So to feel like the moral onees, they created the bible, quaran and othe r moralfagging scote books.
Men dont even like like people. I mean sure when they are young they are alluring so they can trick a women into being their host. But once they hit 30, their true form shows. They lose their "hair", their bodies form bizarre proportions and they start to resemble brutish orges they are.
Observe at this picrel: this is what the average elderly couple looks like. The women is cute, approacable, has hair, wise looking, and genuine. But the scote on the other hand has lost his "hair", is creepy, ugly, brutish. his human aura is missing. His aura is that of a demon. A monster.
This is a huge mess. Only science can save us from this hell.

Anon #homophobia lolcow.farm

For most mammals, including humans, a man “proves” himself primarily through intrasexual competition. In patriarchy, competitive males form trade agreements and one of the effects is enforce female performance via resource monopolization. She does not perform for sexual access, but resource access. The male is a middleman, sex is his racket. This performance is therefore not inherent to her sexual strategy. Take away the ability for men to force themselves on women, and they will switch to provocation to distinguish themselves.
As for homosexuals,

1. Exceptions do not disprove the rule, homosexuality is definitionally an aberration in sexually reproductive species (I will not get into the reasons homosexuality may exist to increase a genetic fitness, just homosexuality as an isolated concept)

2. Homosexuals are still subject to cultural and social influence/incentives
I would also disagree with your assessment on homosexuals in general. Lesbians are far less performative than their heterosexual counterparts, in terms of performing femininity. Gay men are also more performative than their heterosexual counterparts. I would say that, minus direct heteronormative incentives (having heterosexual sex lul), this tracks.

Anons #homophobia lolcow.farm

> At the end of the day, faggotry is inherently anti-woman and as its social acceptability goes up womens rights go down. Its the partition of attractive males to other males to hoard resources away from women. It creates a mentality among men where they only love each other and look down upon us. The cause doesn't matter.

> Hm interesting, and what do you think about homosexual females?

> - cancer is bad
- hmm, what's your opinion on cats?

You thought you did something

Anonymous #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

The only resource moids care about is sex, and the only motivation they can have for anything is sex. (...)

Much of the male thought, no matter how profound, is typically rooted in some variety of sexual inadequacy or preoccupation (see Freud, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, literally all of them). Any seemingly valid ideology can and will be appropriated by moids to do what they are biologically programmed to do - monopolize resources for sexual access and spread their worthless sperm indiscriminately. Much like when gay rights were immediately hijacked by NAMBLA, leftist movements were always traditionally full of sex pests who object not to exploitation of women but to the idea that women aren't socialized and redistributed among the worst and weakest of men. This results in penile doublethink in which women are simultaneously a means of production and also some kind of sexual bourgeoisie consciously withholding a 'vital' 'resource' from moids.

Women's view of socialism as a means to provide fairly for everyone is a reflection of our evolutionary niche - females are programmed to care about the 'other' and see everyone as family/offspring/tribe. Men's optimal strategy is to breed as much as possible while investing as little as possible. Being glorified extensions of their gametes, men see socialism as a way to 'game' their evolutionary niche and gain sexual access without having to wrangle the male hierarchy. Leftism is absolutely a conscious beta male's cry for a chance at genetic perpetuation, whereas right wingers are mostly of the temporarily embarrassed millionaire variety. The left cuck knows he's a cuck so he wants a sexual handout, the right wing cuck is still in denial and thinks he's gonna be Chad with a harem one day.

In the end, they're both sentient sperm sacks with an inherently opportunistic mentality. Everything else is just PR.

Anonymous #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

When a woman's offspring is a male, her genetic interests instantly lie with males, even if she has female offspring. Most conceptions are male, but births are relatively equal due to high rate of malformations in male embryos (they self abort at high rates). Males are more damaging and expensive to gestate. Male babies are more needy, emotional and angry. It's an ultimate sunk cost. Mothers also instinctively understand that in order for her son to win, women must lose - even the most feminist mother in the world will shriek about the epidemic of false rape accusations the moment her semen demon assaults someone at school. Ironically, mothers and grandmothers of boys live shorter lives because they too become worthless and expendable in the eyes of natural selection.

If that didn't sound bad enough, boymom brains are literally colonized with male DNA containing cells. It's uncertain whether the presence of that DNA alters their behavior, but cellular level "warfare" isn't unheard of - the father's fetal DNA "fights" the mother for more resources during pregnancy, for example.

Fun fact: when the male fetus is about to be aborted (spontaneously or surgically), it immediately releases colossal quantities of male DNA into the woman's bloodstream, as a last ditch effort of sorts. Because most of them are aborted spontaneously due to fatal deformity, a question arises about the presence of genetically diseased male DNA in parous women.