Anon #sexist #racist lolcow.farm
Pinkpill here.
Feminism is an inherently western, individualistic, Enlightenment based ideology. I'm going to blow your mind here - technically there can't be any 'nonwhite' feminism because the interests of one's race and tribe are inherently irreconcilable with the interests of women as individuals, because family and all of its surrounding structures innately require female mules. You acknowledge this when you complain about black men/ankhs building black community/identity/self worth on the backs of black women. This isn't a bug, it's a feature. If you want to uplift a nation in any sort of tribal struggle, this is what you have to do. There is no way to support female liberation whilst simultaneously elevating the status of men in your group as compared to men in other groups. In the end you're spending your resources to help advance a man in a male hierarchy. It's unfortunate and I can sympathize with the double bind to an extent, but I have long abandoned the idea that helping women also helps the men (along w with other silly idealistic stuff like 'having it all' and 'teach boys to respecc wamen').
If you're not prepared to be childless/tribeless/identityless and family-less, anything you do will benefit men at your (or other women's) expense.
[...]
Men's issues are not women's issues, but intersectionality aims to obscure that. Being forced to balance the interests of women with the interests of men due to a common group descriptor inevitably results in incidents like not wanting to give up R. Kelly because he's giving more status to the community as a whole. Black men could enslave all white men tomorrow and it would make absolutely 0 difference for black women, except maybe a consolation prize of being sexually valued above white women - a goal that's inherently nonfeminist in the first place.