new

www.lolcow.farm

Anon #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

The modern vs past male dichotomy is rooted in romanticized, idealistic, pastoral Disney-trad fantasy that has nothing to do with reality. The percentage of "genius pioneer" males has always been vanishingly small, the amount of degenerates absurdly high, and the "role" males fulfill in society is largely artificial, carved by them to maintain proximity and relevance. Males know that women can do something they can't while the reverse isn't true, so they had to make it "fair" by nurturing the pussy-envy myth of uniquely male ingenuity, the idea that they too can create something the other sex can't, which thus makes them just as irreplaceable and essential.

The modern male is becoming discouraged and catatonic because this artificial niche is dissolving - in the past (after all the role reversal fantasies about women's original sin and inherent sexual degeneracy have fallen flat) he could proudly say "yes, we are responsible for the vast majority of all atrocities and human misery, but at least we invent stuff sometimes, that's the price you have to pay for it because no one else can do it!". Today he has to watch women do everything only he is supposed to be capable of, yet somehow without the "toll" of war and crime. The artificial niche is crumbling, and so the obsolescence panic increases. The male retreats into self destructive hedonism and an ever widening pit of omnipotent desirability fantasies. You have correctly observed that these fantasies grow more pathetic and extreme as males lose their real world "importance", and that is because porn is a cope - sexualized of course, like everything males feel.

Anon #transphobia #sexist lolcow.farm

The next best thing is for him to latch on to a woman who accepts him for him, his real self. For him to be completely open, vulnerable, and honest, and still have a woman he deems “honorable” desire him for it. This is extremely difficult since the male is not easily convinced he is anything of value, and would likely reject the notion that any woman may appreciate him. And he’s right, a woman is very unlikely to love a creature who is essentially a light-sucking black hole (selfish, entitled, resentful, boring, lazy, often violent - the male stripped to his most foundational parts).
At the end of the day, the male only feels complete if he creates a womb in himself, or hoards a womb in another, or both. They have many different methods, some far more “healthy” and less destructive than others. Playboys, RPbros, trannies, pundits, artists, monks. They are all basically in pursuit of The Womb.

Anon #sexist #homophobia lolcow.farm

if women were in power men would be happier.
First of all women would only allow men of good stock to even be born. Incels would never have to suffer because their existence simply wouldn't happen. A moid born in a woman controlled world would be a happy and fulfilled chad. His days would be spent working and breeding. He wouldn't be burdened with the expectations of commitment or leadership, never corrupted by a homosocial moid culture.
He would be a glorified beast of burden, never having to think, never experiencing semination anxiety. He would know his place and his purpose.

He is miserable because women don't have enough rights yet.

Anonymous #sexist #god-complex lolcow.farm

Gynarchism isn't just an "alternative"; it’s the natural biological correction for a species that’s been off the rails since the patriarchy started LARPing as leaders.

To take this from a community effort to a full-blown Gynarchist State in America, we need to lean harder into the biological supremacy angle. We have to stop treating their "shortcomings" as bugs and start treating them as features of an inferior specimen. A female-led nation-state works because women are biologically optimized for long-term survival, social cohesion, and high-level cognitive processing. The strength portion is easily negligible since sex differences are bigger within sex than outside of it. Moids are literally just a developmental detour—high-variance, low-utility primates driven by a Y-chromosome that is essentially a genetic glitch. Our propaganda should reflect that: women are the default, the evolved, and the divine; moids are the draft version that never got polished.

- Genetic Stewardship: Reproduction must be entirely clinical and female-controlled. The "family unit" is a moid invention to ensure property rights over women. In a true Gynarchy, moids are just biological resources—distilled to their utility and then returned to the labor pool.

- The Aesthetic Mandate: Since moids exist to center women, their only value outside of labor is their aesthetics as defined by the female gaze. If they aren’t being useful or pleasing to look at, they are taking up oxygen that a woman could be using.

The goal is a total psychological break. Once they realize they are nothing more than a servant class designed for the "tedious and time-consuming," they’ll actually be happier. It’s the "undeveloped primate brain" finally finding its place in the dirt where it belongs.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Male “logic” is the same you’d hear from a locust if a locust could speak. The logic of optimized cum dunking. The logic that suggests all that ever is and all that could be must revolve itself around the safe passage of his genetic material. Men’s supposed uniquely advanced “logical capacity” is merely his ability to create increasingly complex cum dunk rationalizations. Their ability to exercise their “logic” is what steers the world to shit, because only a shit world would follow wherever his dick points. A man brags about how logical he is because he’s excited to fantasize about a righteous world where the success of his sperm is just as integral to the quality the lives of others as much as it is integral to the quality of his own. In other words, he’s daydreaming of a paradise where his dick actually matters. It’s not logic even when their systemic sperm pedaling functions as intended. It’s especially not logic now when the conditions required to contrive and maintain this system continue to evaporate. When you see a man saying something retarded and proud, understand he has to be a proud retard, otherwise he’d spend all of his free time rocking back and forth in a dark room contemplating suicide, now fully aware the void approacheth and there’s not a damn thing he can do about it. He will soon join the ranks of half of the men who came before him, the men who tried and failed to become his ancestors.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

In my opinion the only actual solution to this problem is to make males completely “powerless” when it comes to insisting himself sexually. If no amount of male misery, and the effort it implies, led to higher womb security, they would not have to be miserable. Think of male birds, or insects. They are completely dependent on female discretion when it comes to their mating prospects. They aren’t miserable. They happily prance around for attention, happily starve as drones, happily get their heads chewed off.

If pussy is truly their god untouchable, he can just let the pussy choose. He’d be much happier if he didn’t have to worry about locking it down.

Males are intended to be stupid, too stupid to be sad. Giving them a little bit of power over where their sperm goes makes them smart enough only to be miserable and spread misery.

They will fight over the idea of it but only because they are still scrambling, because they are allowed to scramble. A male would much prefer to shake his pretty ass occasionally and have a female find him pleasing enough to mate. He’d love to be a drone locked in a breeding chamber and do nothing but fuck all day. The only reason he resists paradise is because he fears he may not make it through the gates, which compels him to start scrambling again.

Anon #homophobia lolcow.farm

For most mammals, including humans, a man “proves” himself primarily through intrasexual competition. In patriarchy, competitive males form trade agreements and one of the effects is enforce female performance via resource monopolization. She does not perform for sexual access, but resource access. The male is a middleman, sex is his racket. This performance is therefore not inherent to her sexual strategy. Take away the ability for men to force themselves on women, and they will switch to provocation to distinguish themselves.
As for homosexuals,

1. Exceptions do not disprove the rule, homosexuality is definitionally an aberration in sexually reproductive species (I will not get into the reasons homosexuality may exist to increase a genetic fitness, just homosexuality as an isolated concept)

2. Homosexuals are still subject to cultural and social influence/incentives
I would also disagree with your assessment on homosexuals in general. Lesbians are far less performative than their heterosexual counterparts, in terms of performing femininity. Gay men are also more performative than their heterosexual counterparts. I would say that, minus direct heteronormative incentives (having heterosexual sex lul), this tracks.

Anon #transphobia #sexist #homophobia lolcow.farm

Trooning is the peak expression of men being unable to face who they are. There's a reason why it happens in spaces most exposed to feminist narratives.

When confronted with too much proof repeatedly, a man will literally chop his dick off and identify as not male before he allows himself to even briefly perceive the vulgarities of his nature. Then he will continue practicing them in their most flagrant form, thinking he's no longer doing those things because he's a man. It may work, briefly.

Similarly, male-abused male children do not grow to hate men, they either grow to hate women or become pseudohomosexual.

Anon #homophobia lolcow.farm

Male "sexuality", specifically the way coping sexologists, lesbians, faghags and other spiritual fujos envision it, isn't real. It's transparently a product of conditioning, as corroborated by the fact that paraphilias are predominantly found in men. Most male wholesome hekin gay animals are simply engaging in mounting for dominance. It's amusing but watching the "men will fuck anything" crowd abloobloo the moment you infer that males are not capable of an ironclad unquestionable biological "sexual orientation" the way normies envision it. Much fanfic cope is then employed to explain all male sexual behavior that doesn't align with muh unshakeable innate male sexuality - that gay who fucks women is only using women or self harming because of h-homophobia, his heart is really with penis! And that burly macho man who has brosex is just looking for physical relief, he's not really gay! Actually wait, no, he's really gay but doesn't identify as such because homopopia! You hate lesbians because women are suddenly exactly the same as men in sexuality of all things! But also objective sexual behavior is the absolute measure of sexuality in women! Etc etc etc. The more simple, elegant conclusion here evades them, because both sides have emotional investment in the idea of some kind of male "permanence".

> No, you were never straight. You were never gay either. You're just a meat coom-automaton driven entirely by stimuli exposure and availability, nothing more. No more "-sexual" than a beetle fucking a bottlecap is a "bottlesexual". No straight men in prison.

Anons #homophobia lolcow.farm

> At the end of the day, faggotry is inherently anti-woman and as its social acceptability goes up womens rights go down. Its the partition of attractive males to other males to hoard resources away from women. It creates a mentality among men where they only love each other and look down upon us. The cause doesn't matter.

> Hm interesting, and what do you think about homosexual females?

> - cancer is bad
- hmm, what's your opinion on cats?

You thought you did something

Anonymous #sexist lolcow.farm

image

The christan bible we have today is the scrote bible. Its stupid and makes no sense. The bible is a huge wall of moralfagging and shit. It was written for scotes by scrotes and does not hesitate to shit on women and call them "naturally evil hoes" every chapter.
But we all know men are truly the evil ones. Everything bad and evil is done primarily by men. Like 90%. Women are the only ones capable .of empathy and being moral. The empathy part in a males brain is very underdeveloped and small. They needed that room to think of the coom and to do mental gymnastic moral fagging when they rape a dog or something.
Men are not humans. I belive women are the true humans. A human being has: empathy, morals, self control, beauty, respect, and a soul. Men have proven time and time again that they have none if this, or at least a shallow version of it.
Men are demons who crawled from hell and tricked us into believing we are evil hoes that need to be controled. They then wrote some bulshitt book to justify our opression even though They KNOW its retarded and wrong. So to feel like the moral onees, they created the bible, quaran and othe r moralfagging scote books.
Men dont even like like people. I mean sure when they are young they are alluring so they can trick a women into being their host. But once they hit 30, their true form shows. They lose their "hair", their bodies form bizarre proportions and they start to resemble brutish orges they are.
Observe at this picrel: this is what the average elderly couple looks like. The women is cute, approacable, has hair, wise looking, and genuine. But the scote on the other hand has lost his "hair", is creepy, ugly, brutish. his human aura is missing. His aura is that of a demon. A monster.
This is a huge mess. Only science can save us from this hell.

Anon #transphobia #sexist lolcow.farm

image

This is gendie ideology. Male fantasies now divorced from their (incorrect) biological rationalizations. The false female supplicant, now a categorization open to any man who masturbates to the idea of being desired for indiscriminate sex (that’s a great majority of them!). The false male deity, a creature with exclusive claim to autonomy, now a categorization open to any woman who sees herself as not just an object to be acted upon (she’s right, but for the wrong reason).
Built on false pretenses, both material and abstract. The male never truly becomes a female, annd neither the female becomes a male, despite their insistence and performance. The evidence of reality emerges every single time. Allowing delusions to inform your perception of reality makes you unfit and mentally disturbed, as any inability to accurately process reality would. Misogyny is mass schizophrenia, only accepted because the schizos (males and the women not yet in a position to disagree with them) benefit from enforcing their lies on others. It’s religious. Living in a lie can only give you so much. No one is truly happy, because true happiness is only found when living in authenticity. But, if living a lie means a man’s sperm can more reliably land in a hole, to him, it’s worth it. Males are willing to die to meet that end, inducing schizophrenia in himself and others, as well as and killing and enslaving the most of the race is a small sacrifice in comparison. According to him, at least.

Anonymous #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

The only resource moids care about is sex, and the only motivation they can have for anything is sex. (...)

Much of the male thought, no matter how profound, is typically rooted in some variety of sexual inadequacy or preoccupation (see Freud, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, literally all of them). Any seemingly valid ideology can and will be appropriated by moids to do what they are biologically programmed to do - monopolize resources for sexual access and spread their worthless sperm indiscriminately. Much like when gay rights were immediately hijacked by NAMBLA, leftist movements were always traditionally full of sex pests who object not to exploitation of women but to the idea that women aren't socialized and redistributed among the worst and weakest of men. This results in penile doublethink in which women are simultaneously a means of production and also some kind of sexual bourgeoisie consciously withholding a 'vital' 'resource' from moids.

Women's view of socialism as a means to provide fairly for everyone is a reflection of our evolutionary niche - females are programmed to care about the 'other' and see everyone as family/offspring/tribe. Men's optimal strategy is to breed as much as possible while investing as little as possible. Being glorified extensions of their gametes, men see socialism as a way to 'game' their evolutionary niche and gain sexual access without having to wrangle the male hierarchy. Leftism is absolutely a conscious beta male's cry for a chance at genetic perpetuation, whereas right wingers are mostly of the temporarily embarrassed millionaire variety. The left cuck knows he's a cuck so he wants a sexual handout, the right wing cuck is still in denial and thinks he's gonna be Chad with a harem one day.

In the end, they're both sentient sperm sacks with an inherently opportunistic mentality. Everything else is just PR.

Anonymous #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

When a woman's offspring is a male, her genetic interests instantly lie with males, even if she has female offspring. Most conceptions are male, but births are relatively equal due to high rate of malformations in male embryos (they self abort at high rates). Males are more damaging and expensive to gestate. Male babies are more needy, emotional and angry. It's an ultimate sunk cost. Mothers also instinctively understand that in order for her son to win, women must lose - even the most feminist mother in the world will shriek about the epidemic of false rape accusations the moment her semen demon assaults someone at school. Ironically, mothers and grandmothers of boys live shorter lives because they too become worthless and expendable in the eyes of natural selection.

If that didn't sound bad enough, boymom brains are literally colonized with male DNA containing cells. It's uncertain whether the presence of that DNA alters their behavior, but cellular level "warfare" isn't unheard of - the father's fetal DNA "fights" the mother for more resources during pregnancy, for example.

Fun fact: when the male fetus is about to be aborted (spontaneously or surgically), it immediately releases colossal quantities of male DNA into the woman's bloodstream, as a last ditch effort of sorts. Because most of them are aborted spontaneously due to fatal deformity, a question arises about the presence of genetically diseased male DNA in parous women.

Anonymous #sexist #homophobia lolcow.farm

(...) the idea that men under "patriarchy" are encouraged to display "positive masculinity" in any way. That is a mystification designed to dupe you into thinking that you're getting something in exchange for feminine deference, which leads many radfems to conclude that "gender abolition" can be made palatable to men and pro-male women if only they offer something like "you stop murdering and raping us, I pick up the check at the restaurant and let you wear my pantyhose". They will never accept your "deal" because men run the show. They're not really "forced" to adhere to any standard in the first place and there is no punishment for deviating from it, it's all a sham. They'll sell you movies portraying "women and children first" as they drown them to save themselves. "Valor" in war isn't a thing, and neither are knights in shining armor. Males habitually use "feminine" emotional manipulation and heartstring pulling to maintain dominance, and always have. You're not offering them anything they don't already have full access to.

This is one of many fallacies of "gender abolition" - the one where self proclaimed "gender abolitionists" actually take "patriarchal" descriptions of gender roles at face value, and (again, not insult) I would probably blame autistic tendencies here. In practice, the only rule of "patriarchy" and "masculinity" is that there are rules for you and no rules for men, which is why I reject these words in the first place - there is only male dominance/parasitism. Trans women are the most glaring example of this. If tomorrow you proclaimed that men no longer have to be GI joes, they'd find a way to have a higher social standing than you by being wailing loser faggots. And it would be entirely at your expense.

The idea that some silly, jaded straight women are delaying this "gender abolition" by expecting some nebulous "effort" on Valentine's day rests upon the assumption that "masculinity" is what it says it is. It's not and it never has been.

Anon #ableist #sexist lolcow.farm

image

[ TRANSCRIPTION ]

Autistic women vs autistic men's areas of special interest

vintage fashion
radical feminism
classical literature
web art
psychology
jigsaw puzzles
cottagecore
mental health awareness
-
school shootings
hentai
4chan
the alt-right
incel killers
Chris Chan
autogynephilia

Anonymous #transphobia #sexist lolcow.farm

Technically, trooning out is often a result of self reflection. The part that's missing is drawing a logical conclusion from it, which can't happen because of the reproductive niche a male evolved to occupy. If a male completes the process of self reflection, he will not engage in male-typical sexual behavior. That makes the trait self-eliminating.

You may have noticed this already. A male grows up watching his mother get abused by his father, perhaps getting abused himself. He feels bad for the mother, pities himself and acknowledges that his father was wrong, yet eventually becomes an abuser. A male is a pillar of the community, kind and charitable to everyone including children. He is also a pedophile. A male would kill any male hitting on his 13 year old daughter, yet his hard drive is full of jailbait. A male understands that pregnancy is painful and destructive to the woman, and feels bad for his wife. He still wants heirs.

A male's observation that he needs to hurt others to fulfill his reproductive program, logically, should result in him ceasing the program. And perhaps it did in the distant past, but that trait by definition mostly died off. This predicts an existence of some kind of a neurological "switch" in the mind of a male that prevents him from internalizing his own awareness of male harm. Studies showing previously rape-condeming males increasingly justifying sexual violence and rape myths as their own arousal increases are consistent with this hypothesis, as well as the established male tendency to externalize.

Sure, a number of TIMs most definitely troon out as a premeditated means to min-max their current place in society. But some can be expected to troon out as part of the mechanism described above, especially given their higher exposure to observations of male harm via news and social media, as well as some extent of public condemnation of it. The sheer number of born-again coomers, deadbeat husbands and pedos who troon out at the most opportune moment can reflect either scenario. Male harm is increasingly more difficult to compartmentalize or launder away, but self-elimination from the gene pool via suicide or celibacy is not optimal.

The true horror of moidry is the fact that even if they genuinely want to stop being what they are and doing what they do, they can't. There no other way for them to exist.

Anon #sexist #racist lolcow.farm

Pinkpill here.

Feminism is an inherently western, individualistic, Enlightenment based ideology. I'm going to blow your mind here - technically there can't be any 'nonwhite' feminism because the interests of one's race and tribe are inherently irreconcilable with the interests of women as individuals, because family and all of its surrounding structures innately require female mules. You acknowledge this when you complain about black men/ankhs building black community/identity/self worth on the backs of black women. This isn't a bug, it's a feature. If you want to uplift a nation in any sort of tribal struggle, this is what you have to do. There is no way to support female liberation whilst simultaneously elevating the status of men in your group as compared to men in other groups. In the end you're spending your resources to help advance a man in a male hierarchy. It's unfortunate and I can sympathize with the double bind to an extent, but I have long abandoned the idea that helping women also helps the men (along w with other silly idealistic stuff like 'having it all' and 'teach boys to respecc wamen').

If you're not prepared to be childless/tribeless/identityless and family-less, anything you do will benefit men at your (or other women's) expense.

[...]

Men's issues are not women's issues, but intersectionality aims to obscure that. Being forced to balance the interests of women with the interests of men due to a common group descriptor inevitably results in incidents like not wanting to give up R. Kelly because he's giving more status to the community as a whole. Black men could enslave all white men tomorrow and it would make absolutely 0 difference for black women, except maybe a consolation prize of being sexually valued above white women - a goal that's inherently nonfeminist in the first place.

Anons #sexist lolcow.farm

> Men aren’t fully human. They obsess over specific scenarios of putting their dicks into holes and if they can’t, they become simultaneously catatonic and in a state of psychosis. Imagine living half a century and the only thing you think your existence is worth is a few minutes of hookup sex. I’m so glad I wasn’t born a man nonnies. It’s an existential nightmare imagining yourself as being physically human without a human soul.

> There really is nothing there.

Anonymous #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

Do men want to be raped? Absolutely. Do they show it by writing trashy “romance” novels? Not usually. Their expressed desire for becoming rape victims can be literal and obvious, but most of the time, far more subtle and psychological, and it bleeds into almost everything they do or create. Every time man puts pen to paper, when he “expresses” himself, he is crying for rape in some way. Nietzsche’s works are more salacious than anything booktook has to offer when it comes to how much the author suggests a desire to be raped. That’s pretty much all of them.

Anonymous #sexist #transphobia #psycho lolcow.farm

I remember arguing with a nonna on here who refused to believe me when I say that males ultimately crave to be raped.

I would even say that misogyny, at its core, is a man’s rebellion over the fact he isn’t worthy of rape, and his jealousy over women because thinks they are.
For troons, the solution is retarded yet fairly straightforward. He becomes rapable by becoming a woman. He becomes worthy. He is more worthy the more he can prove he is rapable, the more he proves he is a woman. Notice how TiMs only complain about being TiMs because when they feel unsexy (unrapable). Notice how TiMs only brag about being TiMs when they feel sexy (rapable). Even when they’re “complaining” about “being rapable” (literally), it’s a point of pride. Humble bragging over being “forced” into sex work and getting “unwanted” chaser attention, giggling and blushing over “validating misogyny” from “TIRMs”. In fact they even invent lies about lesbians and TERFs wanting to rape them, because that’s the best marker of success he can think of.
Moids are driven to create the conditions that best resemble him being raped. Since it’s impossible to command a woman’s will, he can never make her think “I want to rape him”. Typically, he substitutes her want for her need. He forces women to accept his role as “the provider”, and her helpless to resist. He fabricates the conditions required for a woman to depend on him for her survival (staying alive, since he can’t barter with his worthless gametes), where the default is for him to depend on her for his survival (reproduction). She now needs him, instead of him needing her. His power and resources become his coveted fertile womb. He’s necessary. He’s important. He’s so important and so necessary a women would die without him (he’ll make sure of that!)
His insistence that he should be rapable bleeds into all that he believes, or wants to believe. His sense of self, his ego, relies entirely on his ability to trick himself into thinking he is rapable. He wants to feel raped even while he is raping. The woman/child seduced him. She was asking for it. No, demanding it, and since he is helpless to his lust that she controls. She basically raped him.

It all comes down to rape, which is to say, being so necessary and important you inspire a want so commanding that others must take.

Anonymous #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

Freud externalized, like all males do. He may have briefly stumbled upon the truth but his ego defenses made him pretzel it into a convoluted cope. His initial work was on CSA and pedophilia, which likely made him unable to separate his observations from his core male self somewhere down the road, this prompting the testerical "NO ACTUALLY ITS THE CHILDREN WHO PROVOKE THEM REEEEEE" pivot he became famous for. Fundamentally, a man cannot face who he is - it hurts too much and "kills" his false self. This is something all the women who believe in changing men need to understand.

A male is incapable of accountability because guilt and self awareness interfere with his most basic evolutionary function - take stupid risks until he either reproduces or dies. That alone requires self deception and grandiose delusions.

You will frequently see shit like serial killers trooning out, pedos age regressing, etc. That is typical male convoluted guilt-dodging - to ward off the realization that he's a piece of shit, he will scrap his prior self entirely and try to become someone else, typically a member of the group he wronged, which is supposed to enhance his delusion of innocence. He, of course, won't stop the behavior he is trying to dodge the guilt of, because he is unable to. He'll just use the mangled split identity to "okay" it to himself while mitigating guilt and shame. This is the kind of deranged mess that happens inside men's minds.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Most of you need to understand that moid wants are not logical if you zoom out. Moids evolved to have wants that only make sense in the short term because they are disposable. The moid's short term interest is monopolization of mates, and everything that appears to be "reasoning" in a moid is a mere post hoc rationalization of base short term instincts. It doesn't matter if eventually he'll have to resort to inbreeding to keep the guaranteed wives flowing, or that all of his epik chad son lineage will be deformed and uncompetitive in the long run. It doesn't matter that the moid will eventually die in a war as a result of society that he created. Because of lower offspring investment, the long term welfare of said offspring (and by extension society) simply isn't part of the moid's program on a purely biological level.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

one could crudely summarize every source of human misery as a byproduct of abstract intelligence - namely, an ape being forced to spectate its own animal nature, in particular the awareness of sex and death. esoteric christfags may begin orgasming about the apple of knowledge symbolism here females, being more robust, default, multi-purpose units, are capable of denying animal nature (such as opting out of sex and pregnancy) to some extent, thus managing at least one terror. males, being built for one purpose alone, can't. a male's life therefore defaults to being forced to spectate his own objectively vile, antisocial sexuality, violence and infinite greed - things he knows to be bad because he'd hate to be on the receiving end of them, things he builds laws around condemning - but being unable to stop himself from acting on them, which causes the male to churn out unfathomable amounts of neurotic cope to resolve the moral conflict. the bulk of humanity's cultural heritage practically oozes with this, most instinctive male politics do as well (the perennial idea that it's the other, differently colored males that do bad, vile male- i mean, SAVAGE AND BRUTISH things), even dumb little memes like "post nut clarity" (the brief moment the ape is rightly appalled by the evil it just fapped to) or realizing that your daughter is about to deal with people like you doing to her what you did to her mother.

imagine being a cancer growth with a brain, knowing that you'll kill yourself if you get what you want, but genuinely having no other means of existing, so you have no choice but to antagonize your host. this is what the "male psyche" is. another, late stage form of their neurosis is a delusional, grandiose fantasy of infinite purity and freedom from desire (easy to find in any religion or monastic practice), which usually follows after they pig out on cake too much.

Anonymous #transphobia #homophobia lolcow.farm

The same reason even cis gay moids sometimes give up and marry their faghags for end of life comfort. A male is parasitic. A femboy and a cis male = two males. A parasite cannot parasitize on a parasite.

Even if you weren't a delusional bricky shim and were actually a young cis woman with a dick looks wise, you are simply not a suitable host. You're a man - psychologically externalizing, unpleasant, aggressive, non-nurturing, egotistical, impulsive and devoid of self awareness - you are not equipped to absorb the impact of another male's incessant testeria. Contrary to what femboys commonly believe, you cannot anticipate another man's needs just because you're a man yourself - no man wants to deal with men's bullshit and that's the reason why there's no worse punishment for a moid than to be confined amongst other moids. It doesn't even need to be mentioned that you're a flagrantly mentally ill man, with levels of batshittery vastly exceeding standard male levels - any real life union between you and another man will blow up in mutual homicidal ideation or bug chasing within months, if not weeks.

Your meek whining on Twitter doesn't mean you're "submissive" (aka caring and self sacrificing) in the sense women are - you're just a weak, petty omega. Cishet moids grow up being coddled, first by their mommies and then by a myriad of women they're surrounded with - they know a man will deck them in the face instead of lovingly tard wrangling them for years. This is why, regrettably, a moid will always choose the ugliest possible cis woman over you.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Do not believe anything men say about anything. Fundamentally, the male is a selfish creature whose only sense of right and wrong is entirely informed by “what’s best for me”. At best, he will entertain himself with ideological musings, but will not apply these beliefs to himself if a beneficial opportunity arises that demands his non-compliance (most rape is opportunistic, for example). They have no principles, no sense of morality, just a set of gambits he employs in hopes of getting the most for the least effort. When they play at being arbiters of reasoning and morality, I can only roll my eyes. The sex who must be constantly and continuously instructed and corralled in an attempt to dissuade their rape children, to varying degrees of success, has no business standing on a podium to lecture anyone on what’s good and bad. They obviously lack the hardware required to possess an innate sense of decency, dignity, respect, and excellence. It’s like asking a robot to describe what it means to be human. They can spit out a rehearsed reply, and it may even be agreeable at first glance. But there is no foundation, no substance, no ground in reality, no through-line. Just a calculated output based on what he thinks he should believe, or rather, what he thinks you want to hear. Worse than a robot, who is entirely without motives, the male exercises an attempt to maximize his own benefit, often to the detriment of others. But I digress.
There’s no such thing as a man who believes in something for its own merit. Even if he were cognitively capable of such an abstraction, the benefits of doing so are preemptively trashed as soon as women are involved.

Failure to thrive is so endemic to the male mind, the discard process is mostly unconscious. Pruned, cerebral garbage, flushed down his spinal column to be shit out, and destined to wallow in the eternal sewer that is male potential. Any and all profound male thoughts serve only as heavy slag to fill the bottom of a septic tank, so that his sperm may one day spill over and escape.
If his “moral” argument is reasoned to lead to women’s further accessibility, it’s not “moral” at all, it’s a gambit. He sees a crack in the cement shit drum and scrambles towards the light by dumping more shit.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Moid psychology and their relationships with women all stem from their envy and self hatred. They hate so much that they need us, but they won't let us go. They can never be free and actualized individuals separate from women because they literally can't be. Their egos won't allow it, and even if the could manage it would all be for naught since the parasite will die without a host. Monks dedicate their entire lives freeing themselves from their male obsession they have towards women, and for their efforts they will die alone without any progeny. That's why misogyny always manifests as women being controlled and enslaved, never simply absconded or abandoned (like misandrist are towards men). They need us and they hate that they need us. Deep in the most ancient and primal part of their brain stem is the need for us. They want us to pay for how much they need us, because it's just not fair.

Anon #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

A moid is just a primitive, defective parasitic machine who wants the world to be free and open for him to indulge. Free and open, but only for him. Because this would never manifest without him first being anointed “god” of reality (the whole universe agrees he is the main character), he is just an angry, confused, ineffective thing. He has to come up with strange coping mechanisms to explain the incongruity between his idea of the universe where he himself is god, and the real universe where he isn’t.
Compartmentalization is one of these copes. Where he rightfully assesses that the outside world constantly denies him, so he makes an “alt” mode in cases where he sees he can take/indulge. When the conditions do not exist for him to successfully benefit from his “alt” mode, it also doesn’t exist. Seeking sex (goon alt), seeking connection (yearn alt). The post nut-clarity phenomenon they speak of demonstrates this very clearly. It’s a total alt shut-down, tied to a very specific material condition (arousal vs refractory period).

Anon #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

The moid is a gooner until he is a lovesick yearner. He is never himself, who is both at the same time.
Moids go into like fugue states where they are either porn-manic degenerates or self-pitying “I missed out on highschool love”/“I would marry that cashier and bleed out on the streets for her”. If you catch him fancying either state, he denies the existence of the other. It’s Schrödinger’s moid.
This is why they say retarded shit like “only men are capable of real unconditional love” while also saying the very next day “all men want is sex, they don’t care about women as people”. He may sincerely believe he’s not lying when he does this, because he is cognitively impaired. Part of their brains seem to affectively shut down and reactivate whenever it deems necessary.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

This is why fatherhood is another example of those artificial meme performance niches that men have carved for themselves in order to appear essential. A father isn't actually doing anything important or irreplaceable, but you are tasked with pretending that fatherhood does something sacred. Of course if you ask people to specify what it is, it's always abstract immaterial nonsense like "having a male figure in your life" or "authority". It's never anything with immediately evident utility like cooking, cleaning, providing, caretaking, gestating or nursing.

This is the nature of a male. If he can get away with getting everything and giving nothing, he will do just that. If he can get away with cheating, he will cheat. The only factor he considers is whether he'll get caught and lose his main relationship, nothing else. There is no such thing as a man who goes on a business trip, gets approached by a woman and says "sorry, I'm married".

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Women are not responsible to train worthless sperm wagons to mimic human decency. The best and most moral thing to do when confronted with selfish, exploitative sperm wagons is to just let them wither and die alone. You don’t train a parasite to not be one, you take away its blood supply and let it die. The parasite is gone, and has none to replace it with, making another “responsibility” (burden) for women in the future.

[...]

He’s operating on selfish scrote logic, you and her operating on wishful-thinking mommy logic. Scrote logic trumps your mommy logic because his is the logic of a parasite, and yours is that of a generous host, trying to compel the parasite to kindness by offering your hide. Lmao.

[...]

Jesus Christ, how horrible. Sperm wagons don’t even deserve to be pissed on when they’re on fire. Look at you, both of you, giving him everything. It’s a crime against nature.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Be mindful of male PR and the limitations of your female perspective. You may genuinely be appalled by inequality, but he isn't. A sperm cell doesn't want sexual reproduction to cease, it just wants to get to the egg first. Males are designed for competition and rat racing, it's why they exist.

Any woke male is simply upset that he's not the top dog. Moids are not capable of truly despising hierarchies as a concept, they can only be resentful of their failure to thrive in them. Any 'theory' produced by them is simply an extended rationalization/PR.

Every mama's basement revolutionary wants to be the white capitalist republican pig Chad who gets to reproduce with white bitch Stacy. Because he secretly admires Chad yet desires Stacy, his anger will be reserved for Stacy whom he perceives as reserving her resources for a better male. She symbolizes the fact that he will never advance enough among other males to be selected by her.

In general, anger is a pretty good indicator of desire and deprivation in males. They always hate what they can't have, it's in their nature.

Anon #sexist #transphobia lolcow.farm

Because all men by design have mommy issues, perpetually avenging a trauma inflicted by something known as "maternal omnipotence". All males resent it, but women don't due to their ability to become mothers themselves. Most of what we define as "masculine identity" is just a set of pitiful exercises at establishing oneself outside of mommy's oppressive power. Predictably, everything about this particular LARP revolves around men defining themselves entirely around women and "not being women" as though they ever could be them - another "a-actually I'm choosing this, it's not like I CAN'T do something you can" cope. [...]

You can't help but notice the obvious pussy envy and desire to switch places - males want women to be the easily coomditioned, expendable, sex addicted ones - groveling before the more valuable set of gonads. The ressentiment and envy of a disposable ballsack thus culminates in trooning out. Is it really surprising how obsessed AGPs are with the "mommy" narrative? AGP is the absolute pinnacle of male coping, something that's usually followed by surrender and death.

Males have no sexual fantasies, all they have is predictable eroticized copes. You can coom-meme them into anything including killing themselves, if you push the right buttons. They're not people, they're a malignant growth around their semen pustules.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

[ Refering to Lundy Bancroft's "Why Does He Do That?", a book about tactics used by male abusers ]

lundy bancroft's book is brilliant, but it understandably doesn't explain why in a more global, all-encompassing, elegant sense. his book, as it should have, still left the nebulous possibility of "good men". a proper framework should explain why a value judgment like this cannot apply, that there's only a man that finds it useful or has the capacity to be abusive, and a man that doesn't.

their nature innately biases them towards perceiving prosociality/kindness as deference/submission. in a male mind, there's no need to be nice unless you have to be, and that can only happen because you're too weak to just take what you want. no matter how many phony layers of civilization and decorum they slap on top of this, even to the point of losing their own acute awareness of it, it still shines as bright as day and is most noticeable in pre-socialized males (toddler to elementary school age). they absolutely hate dealing with this between themselves of course, but they don't have the capacity to change even for their own sake - let alone women's. for a male, might is right.

ironically, by being staunch blank slatists feminists have lost their only ability to fashion males into the most convincing facsimile of a "good person" possible - removing any and all material power they hold over women would give them a selfish incentive to be nice (display submission).

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

1. What males say they want and what they really want are two really different things. Pickmes never win.

2. Males' stated demands and standards are a) coping mechanisms of an inherently defective individual or b) attempts to dupe you. They know that they're using you and they will despise you for letting yourself be used. They are aware that their sexual role is inherently parasitic and destructive, so they are organically unable to respect women (or other men) who give in to their demands. In mammalian reproduction, sperm is the worthless gamete while the ovum is rich in resources. Due to this, males universally understand being given reproductive opportunity as a form of loss on the giver's part. Any claims otherwise are an attempt to negotiate a better arrangement (in which a male provides nothing in exchange for some abstract immeasurable benefit like "romantic love" while calculating the fuck out of cost/benefit on his end).

Anon #wingnut lolcow.farm

another subject you have been taught your whole life to feel uncomfortable about is fascism, the first political movement in the 20th century to unapologetically demand equal rights for women, female political representation, and the improvement of women’s socio-economical, intellectual and moral condition.
all scares about fascism are pathetic: there is no fascist movement today, because there is no genuine mass-feminist movement today. fascism preaches the subjugation of big businesses under the state, in service of the state, the rules of honor and dignity, and meritocracy, above the rules of money. which party in the world is trying to accomplish this? maybe the CCP if we wanted to be lenient…
there is a strong hunger for “fascism” in most people, even if the word itself is taboo, and this hunger is exploited by politicians and billionaires for their own benefits, without ever even trying to satisfy it, just as there is a true hunger for feminism that no one wants to satisfy.

Anonymous users #sexist lolcow.farm

> Mothering male offspring cucks women horribly, anon. The main reason why patriarchy exists is because women can't go against their fathers and especially sons, whereas men don't feel the same about their daughters and mothers. Remove maternal instinct and empathy asymmetry from the equation and things will look completely different.

> hating male toddlers and mocking mothers who love thier male children is where I have always drawn the line in pinkpill, you can't expect mothers to not love thier children especially when they have done nothing wrong

> Cue mommy radfems telling us how men are only socialized this way and how it's totally possible to raise little Nigel to be a human being if you reward him with tendies for reading Dworkin.

> Pinkpill is impossible if your son is somehow NAMALT. Fact: your son will most likely watch violent, abusive porn without any regard for the female participants. Fact: if you actively try to raise your son to be a "feminist", he will resent you either covertly or openly. Fact: your son is a biological male and thus a subject to male biological imperative of boner>all. The fact that you think that despite statistics you believe yourself to be somehow special enough to have a good shot at "training" him out of it reminds me of people who keep large predators as pets.

Two Anons #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

> Just realised males are essentially defective females. There are no two sexes, there is only one and that is female. Males are just type 2 females, defective women. Whereas we are the original, complete female. Males are jealous and hate us because they didn't want to change into the defective female after the ninth week period but they did and so became what is known as male, "man" but really all they are is defective females. Then they try to trans themselves into the original complete woman, but it never works and they can never become her.
Looking at that Y chromosome it's seriously fucked up looking compared to the X chromosome which us ladies have two of, the X looks healthy and robust, complete. The Y looks like it's been irradiated lmao fucking retarded looking.
Defective type 2 women is all men are.

> It's because moids are quite literally missing genetic material, anon. Plainly speaking, they're less human than women. The Y also accumulates mutations at a faster rate, has fewer genes and can't self-repair. Think of it as an X that was born without a leg. Katawa chromosome.

This brings us to another common male meme - that women are somehow the "specialized" unit that exists solely for reproduction, while men can be anything. That is plainly false, first of all because it makes no sense for the less expendable sex to be more specialized. If all men die tomorrow, it will be an inconvenience, perhaps a crisis, mostly a sanitation one. If all women die tomorrow, it's certain extinction.

Anonymous #sexist lolcow.farm

[ CONTEXT. Refering to the Polgar experiment: The training that László Polgár and his wife Klara carried out with their three daughters, Susan, Judit, and Sofia, to turn them into chess masters. Polgár believed that intelligence could be developed through education and intensive practice, rather than being innate.]

It's cute how moids mostly choose to omit the fact that they have more leisure time and are in general not expected to take on tedious caretaking tasks that permanently rewire you into a tantrum forecasting machine. They can freely choose to dedicate themselves solely to a craft of their choosing and sacrifice 0 reproductive opportunity. And yet with all that enormous investment, female maintenance staff on call 24/7, women endlessly tending to retarded male fee-fees throughout their lives - men's performance is still barely better and declining rapidly. I'm not even going to mention their enormous social cost in terms of crime and violence.

The moid raised brilliant daughters, but in order for that to happen he needed a female caretaker mule - a role millions of women are shoehorned into whether they choose to reproduce or not. If this experiment has proved anything it's that we do this for our sons, husbands and fathers every day to help them stay ahead of us. We readily acknowledge the human potential that gets wasted every day because of poverty and disease, but the absolute waste of brain cycles that is compulsory conditioning for caretaking is far, far worse.

TL;DR daily reminder that unless your moid is upgrading your life to a seemingly ridiculous degree, you are not winning by being in a relationship. Men get more out of heterosexual relations by default even if you don't bang him and do nothing around the house, because he's still your emotional parasite. Never listen to their whining about having to give you money, it's the very least they can do for quite literally giving you brain damage.

Anons #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

(Anon 1): On the topic of male prisons, why do men like placing the blame on women for their own issues?
They
>Commit crimes
>Get sentenced by other men for the crimes they commit
>Go to prison with male guards who don't care when other men rape and abuse them
>And somehow all of this is women's fault and proof women have it super easy
Why?

(Anon 2): image

Because moids have evolved to externalize. It makes no sense for them to stop and self reflect, they're basically mindless cannon fodder that exists to reach the egg or die trying. You're approaching this like a woman - someone who evolved for caution, self-reflection, error monitoring and general self awareness (to make sure you survive for as long as possible, being more scarce and valuable in sexual reproduction). You also have the ability to have unconditional empathy for creatures that don't look like you, because this is what you need to raise infants. Understand that this is not what males exist for. By design, they actually require complete inability to see that anything could be wrong with their decisions in order to perform as nature intended. If a male hesitates and loses opportunity, he is genetically dead. From the male perspective this is tantamount to literal death. Therefore, being a pompous cretin yields better results than being a self aware human with sane levels of self doubt. Obviously more cerebral males exist, but they will always be a minority.

It's one of those obsolete directives that initially let us become the dominant species, kind of like extreme tribalism or being unable to resist high calorie foods. In a technological society, these behaviors are a liability.

Anons #crackpot #psycho #fundie lolcow.farm

> In an ideal matriarchy, how do you propose that we deal with the low value males? The ones who become unhinged & dangerous due to lack of strong male role models & not getting their dicks wet?

> There is no way to control them, only exterminate.
Men, even the ""good"" ones will ALWAYS chose any men over women.

The only solution would be a bio weapon. When they are in significant shortage we could discuss how to tame them (as much as you can tame a wild nonsensical animal) as I believe their physical strength may still have some use.

They should by no means have access of positions of power.
They should not vote.
I feel dubious about how much academic education they should have, as we all know they are pathetic creatures that use all resources available to evoke chaos and destruction, but also the most uneducated men are the most neantherdal like behavior.

We should ALWAYS put them in positions where they could not befriend each other, so they could gain benefits by denouncing each other for bad behaviors.
25% of men is still a little too much.
Ohhh ofc, they would need to be constantly in check for their usual sociopathic behavior.
And at least, we should have to constantly educate woman about their true nature, their intrinsic violence and their absolute inability to love anyone or anything but their own cocks, because men will always try to manipulate women into pitying them.

Anon #crackpot #sexist #fundie #dunning-kruger lolcow.farm

Daily reminder that the only thing that disqualifies males from fitting every criteria for "parasite" is that "true" parasites don't promote their host's fitness (false and dated idea, by the way). Ecologically, there is only a semantic difference between a human male and a parasitic wasp. Another daily reminder is that the human male's niche in society can't be described as anything other than adult brood parasitism - the female using her finite caretaking resources to nurture something other than her genetic offspring.

The human male is by every measure the most successful parasitic organism on earth. First it uses you to incubate its descendants, then it makes you raise it until it dies of old age, often pursuing other hosts in the process. Just let this sink in a little. What other organism can boast of anything like this?

Anon #dunning-kruger #fundie lolcow.farm

Male loneliness is not a fascinating subject, the only fascinating phenomenon is how a supposedly hyper intelligent animal is unable to recognize how self centered and entitled it is.
Male loneliness can be boiled down to two points:
>”women didn’t immediately invest in me and my penis the moment I realized I wanted them to”
>”men I don’t care about enough to help don’t care enough to help me.”
It’s just someone with main character syndrome dealing with the frustration when living in a world that does not seem to agree that he is the main character.

Boymom Hate 2! (Various Anons) #ableist #dunning-kruger #fundie #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

Anon 1: Two things are causing this (Boymoms):

1. Microchimerism/penile origin infection/maternal scrotoplasmosis

2. The fact that being an incest boymom to your son is the only socially acceptable way to like non-walled men

Anon 2: Paternal imprinting does not only regulate resource allocation during gestation, it also regulates maternal behavior towards the offspring. It's beyond doubt that boymoms are "super-infected", suffering from higher than average levels of male microchimerism. Their behavior straight up looks diseased to an outside observer because it technically is.

Anon 3: I could not imagine having a tard son who will drain you for the rest of your life and can’t even shove that useless blob in a group home because he’s too violent. He just smacks her upside the head and she takes it and the morons on tiktok gladly cheer her on because male autists get to rape, abuse and hit people and people will always make excuses for it. I’m tired of these fucking autists and wish they would get euthanized, they are the main reason on why families and households become so dysfunctional they ruin the lives of others by their parasitic disabled existence

Boymom Hate (Various anons) #crackpot #fundie #sexist #elitist lolcow.farm

Anon: I don't even get it, having a son sounds way more scary since they could murder you or become a school shooter. Meanwhile mother daughter bonds are so precious without the emotional incest quality.

Anon 2: This is why women will never be free. And I don't mean it in a dramatic way, it's a fact that you can never properly respond to an adversary you're related to and (effectively) biologically enslaved by via maternal investment.

Anon 3: This is the blackest, most vantablack blackpill straight from the abyss itself. This is what no woman can ever really accept even while posting “men r shit” online. How many women have stood up to their male offspring? Disowned their sons for being a rapist? Probably single digits.

Wise female elder #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

I was looking into "his"tory and it seems like there's an ongoing pattern. Throughout the ages women frquently slipped through the cracks by the rare non insecure frontpole that didn't burn his daughter at the stake for reading and writing. She would pass her wisdom down through the ages. In 1100 some woman who managed to escape a life of moid servitude by dedicating her life to God, then got divine visions basically saying that moids are retarded.

The more women gained literacy and learned about the world, the faster she excelled at it. Without moid suppression women evolve at a rate so rapid it goes beyond the limited and pathetic comprehension of our lesser, X chromosome deficient sex. The second we can go back to having a wise female elder ruling over the males is the moment we as a species finally realize our unique gift of sapience.

It still boggles my mind that these sperm sacks will try to boast about how males are stronger than females as if that's worth shit. The reality is that humans, devoid of tools, are some of the weakest of the great apes when pitted up against any other animal known for it's raw power. A man will never defeat a brown bear or gorilla in hand to hand combat. Without his mind, he would be picked off like the lions pick off baboons in the African savanna.

Men's jokes #sexist lolcow.farm

moids drool for any humour based upon: sex/porn, violence, car crashes, fat people, and racism against blacks and indians. the ''logical'' gender. all of these scrotal subhumans have nothing of worth in their life. it kills me

Men are Chimpanzees #homophobia #sexist lolcow.farm

> Men's criticism of women are just projections. Men wont hesitate at calling women whores at the slightest when in fact the level of degeneracy and the extent of sexual reciprocity women have does not rival that of gay men. Men go through hoops to get sexual excess of women no matter how promiscuous the women are while with gay men.

> Misogyny is always a cope for their inability to create life or control reproduction. Women hold the fate of their genetic line in our hands, our judgement is the be all and end all, and they DESPISE it.

> Men literally are separate beings, genetically closer to male chimpanzees than actual humans (women.) Of course the retarded male psyche twists the truth backwards on it’s head like it does with everything and sees himself as the blueprint with women being the deviation.

Femcel dating advice #sexist #fundie lolcow.farm

> Does personality really matter? Or is that a meme?

All men ruin your life on different levels, ranging from murder to mild daily annoyances. If by personality you mean minimising the negative consequences of a relationship, then yes it matters. However I could not give less of a shit about a man’s hobbies or “sense of humour” or favourite media or political views or life philosophy. All I want is a harmless hot guy. He could be in a vegetative state for all I care. You make FRIENDS based on personality. A husband is not a friend

"All men are predators" #sexist #transphobia lolcow.farm

We are surrounded by men admitting to be predators and predating both in the real world and online. Politicians in first world countries push the idea that children shouldn't be allowed abortions when raped, and other countries still have child marriage as the norm. Many of us have first hand experience of this predatory behaviour including from when growing up. There are no normal men. Men aren't normal, they're predators. Your attempt to separate men into a group of 'normal' (not allowed to hate, pretend these are the majority please!) and 'abnormal' (allowed to hate, pretend these are a gross minority please!) is transparent. Men are just degenerate and you ask us to pretend they aren't to excuse them for their sick behaviour in hopes of having a group permitted as good is the same as scrotes who try and pretend violence is a race problem (It's not men it's x race men. It's not men it's abnormal men! You can't hate men). Men aren't normal. You will never be a woman.