www.lolcow.farm

Anons #sexist lolcow.farm

- Contrary to all the shounen shit anime and brotherhood porn males consume, male friendships are shallow and empty af because males prioritize themselves. Only really young scrotes have some semblance of friendship when they’re yet saddled with personal responsibilities. Most grown scrotes would not help a friend move or plan a birthday party lol. They’re the definition of fair weather friends, they’ll play vidya, go drink, and chat shit but that’s it. Even when scrotes vent to each other about their shitty lives or whatever, they’re still unfulfilled because males are only conditioned to steal emotional labor from women.

- True, if you've ever had an all-male friend group (or a male friend with insight into male friendship) you know how much it sucks. Even with all their issues female friendships have the massive advantage of actual emotional bonding and support. If you think about it, most het romance is things you'll find in female friendship but with sex and a man in place of a friend.

>men prioritize their friendship with each other over women

This is true, but it has nothing to do with depth or quality of friendships, and everything to do with male solidarity against women

- I don't know why people romanticize male friendships when almost all of them want to kill themselves from the lack of emotional support they receive from their friendships.

- Kekkk this made me feel a lot better. The rare female friendship is higher in value than the common male friendship. Like pulling a Common versus an Ultra Rare.

Anons #sexist #crackpot #fundie lolcow.farm

Plato is a stupid gay

>Plato in Timaeus claims that men who were cowards and were lazy throughout their life shall be reborn as women

Its pretty amazing that they never caught on that the split in population of the sexes is nearly 50/50. by their own standards, exactly half of men born before them in their own exalted society were lazy cowards. And if good bois got to become stars and shitty men became women, then their own ideal citizenry would eventually become a pure sausagefest.

Reminder to not take any words seriously from male philosophers dead or alive especially pertaining to reincarnation; they are only able to navel-gaze and process existence from their own little cage, absolutely entranced by their eternal dominance hierarchy, they do not understand creation, nature, life and death; only destruction and futile attempts at domination within the material-world

-----

Spot on, anon.

God fucking damn it, men are so fucking vile and full of themselves. I genuinely don't get how fucking stupid you have to be to spit shit like this and have so little empathy and self-awareness while being aware you are going to reincarnate. It's counter-productive but they are narrow minded, loud, and full of themselves; men are not very logical creatures, no matter how much they like to lie to themselves.

We are simply the smarter sex, even the dumb ones among us… For us it's like trying to understand how a dog thinks and views the world from his little dog mind.

-----

Notice how most male philosophers usually come to the conclusion that life is meaningless/empty/suffering? The un self aware ones try to project this view on women too. The self aware ones just fall short of saying "men aren't meant to be alive, and are only able to function on an animal level, only caring about things like reproduction, control, and labor."
They don't have a connection to the universe/source/god/etc and want to deny it even exists to save face.

Anon #sexist #psycho lolcow.farm

This is how I see it
Men desperately want to be so valuable that women desire them so much that they would move mountains to procreate with them.
They realize that the opposite is true, that women find them so disgusting they would instead move mountains not to procreate with them.
Men see this as the ultimate betrayal, and a complete rejection of their entire existence. He rectifies the situation by raping her instead, knowing full well she finds him and what he does to her revolting on a level comparable to death. A man raping a woman is punishment for her not raping him. He takes for himself a woman’s life force that he felt she was unfairly given and he was unfairly denied. He ruins/defiles/annihilates her to create justice out of her initial injustice (of simply existing as a woman)
If you understand how this works literally every psychosexual issue they have makes sense. This is how they can paint themselves as the victims of women’s sexualities, in that she unfairly owns the life force that he himself lacks and is helplessly required to pursue. How they can think this while knowing their presence is so horrible that every woman is ruined in the worst way imaginable through his contact, which escalates infinitely as his contact increases.
A male is a semi-self-aware parasite who hates that he depends on his host to thrive, knows she is ruined whenever he takes her blood and how she hates him for it, and enacts his revenge on the situation itself by stabbing her even more severely, even more frequently, in even more hosts that have blood left to be drained. It’s a very sick cycle and why misogyny escalates like a nuclear chain reaction, unlike any other form of hatred. There’s few to no racists who hate other races of men like they do women, how sadistically and compulsively they seek to punish and take from them both physically and psychologically.
They are raped by their own existence and wish women would rape them to save them, but because she won’t, he rapes the world.

Anon #homophobia lolcow.farm

I hate male homosexuality so much. What a miserable, dysgenic birth defect.
I can't believe women have been psyopped into hyping up these faggots and treating them as untouchable divas. I would rope if I was born a male with SSA. Imagine your brain being so fucked up you want to stick your dick in the excretory system or have your excretory system violated.
You have one (1) primary purpose as a male, to serve as a faithful mate to a woman, and you're already born broken.
I'll take my alog ban. Men who reserve and crave love, respect, and attachment for and from other men exclusively are fucked in the head.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Everything men do is an adaptation. Absolutely nothing they do is truly altruistic or for the benefit of anyone other than themselves. Women are universally ashamed of pursuing overt self interest, which automatically puts them at a disadvantage.

Liberal men are (for one reason or another) not built to sexually succeed in a right wing environment. Right wing men cannot thrive in a liberal society. Both of them are after male interests only. Typically, commies want women to be public property and nazis want women to be private property.

This is partially why any nationalist (or Marxist, or any other "inclusive" branch) feminism is ineffective. If you're advancing the interests of a nation, you're advancing the interests of male tribal hierarchy. That's exactly what happened to black women's earnest desire to uplift black people as a whole - their efforts amounted to helping black men expand their sexual opportunities. Any seemingly good ideology that includes both men and women can and will be appropriated by men to benefit mostly men.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Note how you're immediately internalizing guilt for the way males are even though there is physically no way you can bend yourself over backwards to mitigate their feelings of inferiority - a typical feminine, maternal, virtuous approach all males learn to exploit since childhood. Males are the way they are entirely because of nature and you can't (and shouldn't) appease them enough into changing their ways. What you should be doing is removing them from society so no woman is materially impacted by their fantasies, beliefs and behavior. Ironically, that might actually improve them because they'll do anything to continue being close to women - it won't be the genuine moral epiphany your idealistic female self is hoping for, but rather something akin to opportunistic compliance of a subdued animal.

Anons #sexist #god-complex #psycho lolcow.farm

> How do we get moids to rope faster?

I need a way to actively participate to get those numbers up, we cannot keep living like this.

> i still like my "act as china's proxy" plan. the chinese supply the lsd in the water supply/ shock collars/ drones/ explosive collars or whatever, along with a few technical advisors, and women rule over/ cull moids in the form of a puppet state

> asking the important questions. Maybe if males roping themselves is fetishized somehow, that would get the numbers up. Besides that, we need to ask ourselves, what topic really, really gets them depressed to their core?

> Their very existence makes them depressed. Deep within every scrote, even the most braindead is a neuron that is aware their existence will be rendered completely obsolete the moment synthesized sperm becomes mainstream.
Males lack inner beauty, love, compassion, empathy, or joy. They cope by oppressing women, but no matter what they do to us, the reality is still there. Women are the bringers of love and life, and men are the bringers of hatred and death death.
I and countless others would love for males to be able to internalize this information and manifest it into mass suicide instead of externalizing it. But I think the only solution to the male question is widespread misandry.

Anons #sexist lolcow.farm

> These men are still of the mindset where they have to become gigachad to get the most access to women. Now you just have gymcels and angry misogynists keeping their defunct grift alive. Why? No other reason than that they're stupid as fuck and can't wrap their chimp minds around any other system. Doing so. Would make them confront the reality of what they actually are, neurotic parasites with no future, and the male mind simply isn't evolved enough to come to terms with that level of existential thought.

> It's actually evolved specifically for that. It is well known that men tend to be more narcissistic and more likely to overestimate their chances when it comes to virtually anything (at least initially, before the incel depression sets in). This is an adaptation stemming from male worthlessness - it was simply of no evolutionary benefit for the "cheaper" sex to practice self doubt or self preservation. Men are significantly more likely to harbor Dunning-Kruger delusions because of this - dying trying to shoot his shot and failing to reproduce are entirely equivalent outcomes to a male, so might as well shoot his shot. Conceptions lean male to compensate for the fact that men are pretty much designed to die by 30, but modern medicine is tampering with this process, thus promoting excessive and unnatural male survival (especially among geriatrics). Dysgenic, decayed perspectives that shouldn't exist thus become dominant narratives in society.

Nearly every facet of their warped psychology stems from two things: cuck anxiety and what inceloids call "male disposability". This is the reason why they'll delude themselves endlessly and externalize faults (example: ineffectual paypigging for male gurus, incel movements, terrorism) instead of genuine self improvement or therapy. You cannot fix a fault you are designed to be unable to confront in the first place. The delusion must keep going to fulfill a male's ultimate purpose (reproduction), and a man stops trying to reproduce, he might as well die or enter a "blackpilled" depressed state equivalent to death.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Men know they are shit, which is why they talk and act the way they do. They are ironically much more easy to crack, so long as specific protective measures are taken to avoid taking damage from his inevitable melties when ego is under threat. Once they feel insulated from consequences, and once he realizes that there is absolutely nothing he can do to prevent or punish disclosure, he will readily open up. It’s cathartic to them to be vulnerable enough to discuss their “demons” and not face rejection for it. I do not recommend attempting it, since even without a candid confession, moids are not clever enough to obscure what they are, especially not when every other male in existence is doing their part to blow their cover in some way or another. They are extremely obvious to read if you have a modicum of pattern recognition and aren’t currently gaslighting yourself into refusing to read them.

The effort getting honesty out of any particular male is neither worth the investment nor the risk. When a man feels truly “vulnerable”, he will inevitably just admit his struggle to manage his excessive entitlement in a world that refuses to validate it, and his violent, rapey, pedophilic tendencies. We already knew all that, but the male still thinks his “demons” are special and absolutely must be concealed. The male is a safe with a turd inside located in a museum exhibit called “safes with turds inside”.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Moids are extremely fragile, intrasexually competitive, sexually neurotic, prone to externalization/externalizing their locus of control, transactional, and lack empathy (this last point cannot be overstated). This combination of traits, otherwise known as Normative Male Retardation, is the impetus of the “moid take”. “Moid takes” become the zeitgeist if and when moids are given the power force them into pseudo-existence. If he cannot effectively insist himself, he looks to the past for evidence, where men before him have once manifested his delusions. He invents or misconstrues doctrine (science and religion) for evidence. He cherry-picks fringe cases (often the result of previous male contrivance anyways) for evidence, or just convinces himself his own lies are as good as evidence, because if what he believed wasn’t true, why would he believe it? He will do anything and everything before he admits he must adapt, choosing instead at every turn to somehow manipulate reality itself to suit him instead. Even if it’s only in theory, he can only ever believe he is right. NMR is the reason. (...)

Their empathy deficit and neurosis are so high, they cannot accurately discern women’s incentives and conditions. He does not understand the world as an environment shared by actors with entirely different perspectives, approaches, goals, etc. Women are especially enigmatic, since they are so unalike him. He only understands reality where his thoughts are objective. His “objective” beliefs predictably clash with a subjective reality. Since he is deficient, his idea of reality is similarly deficient. This makes him fragile, and increasingly fragile the more dissonant his ideas and approach becomes. He lacks the ability to predict, plan, and adapt. The only way he can relieve his discomfort of living in a constant state of myopia is through aspiring towards absolute control.

For many men, yapping is the only remaining tool at his disposal to manipulate his surroundings, and he is primarily focused on getting women to comply. It’s very important to him, since ensuring reproduction is in second order to ensuring that his heart keeps beating. Actually, that’s debatable. I’m pretty sure males only keep their hearts beating because they might miss out on some insemination opportunities if they let it stop.

Different anons #sexist #god-complex lolcow.farm

> Tesla was based, he knew men were worse than women and women were superior. Towards the end of his life he thought society ran by women would be much better

> He got very close to reaching the final stage of male exclusive existential grief in accepting his true position in the world. A man capable of just peering into that void is going to also have the intelligence, ingenuity, and introspection to do other genius things. The moid struggle is both horrific to experience as well as entertaining to observe. I both like and dislike Tesla and men like him. I wish we could just put them all into a zoo and observe them like animals.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

I hate when men use “theory of mind”, it only ever demonstrates how they themselves lack theory of mind. Not agreeing with or tolerating someone’s behaviors doesn’t mean you are completely oblivious to what, how, and why they behave the way they do. Criminal psychologists for example can develop a very accurate model for the minds of murderers, and the fact that they aren’t condoning and enabling murdering doesn’t mean they’re bad at their job.
It’s the same moid logic that has them parading around their “toxic empathy” talking point. They just lack a robust sense of self and have no principles, and believe if you understand someone/something that means you have to comply and obey. No wonder they’re so submissive and love hierarchies. If someone tells them what to do they’ll do it, so their only defense they have is refusing to listen. Then when women don’t fall in line with what they want, they just project and say she lacks the willingness or capacity to listen.
If he’s right he should be damn thankful. Women projecting a greater level of humanity on moids than they actually possess benefits moids infinitely more than not. Little disruptive Timmy getting his feeling hurt after reprimanded because his teacher “expects better of him” is the same type of woman who thinks she can bring her abusive husband to the light if she just could just coax it out of him. Go ahead and take away women’s grace by forcing them to accept male primitive nature. Timmy will be happy when you stop trying to force him to read and let him snack other boys with sticks, until he grows up and can’t find a replacement mommy to take care of his violent, illiterate ass.

Femcel dating advice #sexist #fundie lolcow.farm

> Does personality really matter? Or is that a meme?

All men ruin your life on different levels, ranging from murder to mild daily annoyances. If by personality you mean minimising the negative consequences of a relationship, then yes it matters. However I could not give less of a shit about a man’s hobbies or “sense of humour” or favourite media or political views or life philosophy. All I want is a harmless hot guy. He could be in a vegetative state for all I care. You make FRIENDS based on personality. A husband is not a friend

Anon #psycho #sexist lolcow.farm

Wonderful things exist in spite of males, not because of them. The male creates things he believes may be wonderful, only in attempts to assuage the existential madness, the consequence of rebuking the gift of awareness bestowed upon him in order to pursue proliferation. He resents that he must create just enough not to die, and this applies to everything he does. He is not happy in the society he produces, but he can’t not produce it, since it’s all he knows, and is too afraid of being lost to irrelevance to change. Awareness cannot be easily excised from the minds of men, and his misery is his curse, one that can only be relieved so long as he is never permitted to have what he wants.
If your idea of “creation” is a teeming swarm of biomass subsisting on as little as possible in order replicate and degrade themselves even more, then yes, moids are certainly creative. They love creating something that’s not quite death but somehow worse and more terrifying. Do just enough to thrust their genes in a hole unwilling, whatever refuse left after his diabolical idea of a union is fulfilled, that is his creation, his legacy. Only someone who doesn’t know any better would think the pile of discarded shit deserves its own plaque, because all you’ve ever known was a man’s shit. You’re a fool to believe any man proclaiming his own obsessive compulsion to breed at all costs has driven this world towards goodness, let alone pioneered it. The only thing that progresses this world in relation to men is in how many of them you can shove off of it.

Anon #sexist #god-complex lolcow.farm

By nothing short of a miracle, the universe decided to split us down the middle in order to bring something more beautiful to this world than a festering bioswamp. That one iota of thought, of awareness, of rebellion, of wanting something greater than just enough and worse until it’s not, is the impetus of the female spirit. And by the grace of god herself, she let us come to be, and ever since we have come to be, life on earth has become more than just a writhing wasteland of death and decay. Females distinguished and assigned the role of ensuring that only the best of us continue, and males to be the best or die trying, either under her judgement, or by killing the pathetic protozoan beside him attempting to do the same thing. We have and will continue to pull these scrotes out if the slime, kicking and screaming, and they will kick and scream. They pine for the womb indefinitely, the soup, the slime, the nothing, of life enmeshed with death in its closest proximity. They resist the urge to progress into the world, and to the extent that they do, it’s because women only permitted them to exist at all if they at least mimicked her curiosity and will for a life lived at its fullest. When left to his own devices, without women there to stop him from doing everything possible to regress into his primordial state, he will do everything he can to return there. Look at how man has stewarded the world for the past few thousand years. We are locusts. Our only claim to superiority, aside from proliferation, are the products of our burdensome awareness, technological and artistic products, a man’s shoddy attempt to recreate the life he has successfully corralled and semi-successfully slain. In a man’s world, a man still burdened with the gift of thought, people, as well as their inanimate creations, are malformed. Human creativity is but a nuisance in a free and ideal scrote society, both in himself and especially for women (which is a significantly
more egregious crime when he applies his standards to her).

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

The male psyche is characterized by mild to severe narcissism. The only reason why it's not rightfully pathologized is because it's part of their biology - they all meet the criteria, so it's their "norm". They come pre-equipped with Dunning-Kruger and positive bias because males are largely expendable (just like their gametes). Their reproductive strategy favors retarded risks because the sole reason why they exist is being a vehicle for genetic diversity and the worst possible outcome for a male is to not reproduce - it's equivalent to death (incels in particular are very truthful about this). So to them, risking everything to make it as a glorified sperm wagon (or doing absolutely anything to spread their DNA as much as possible, whether it's immoral or not) makes sense because it beats quietly waiting to perish. This is what they evolved to do, and absolutely everything about the male mind revolves around this premise. They are not full humans, they are a highly specialized evolutionary crutch with a very narrow task to perform.

Anon #homophobia lolcow.farm


As for gay men, they only become actively aggressive towards women when they feel threatened that women will somehow cut off their cum supply. They are envious that women can get the dick they want, and sometimes believe that if they can belittle or bully them, then somehow, some way, a straight man out there will finally be convinced to fuck him instead. It’s mostly petty, and not nearly as damaging as the harm men can and will do if they know for sure abusing you will immediately get them what they want. Straight men have a monopoly on misogynistic abuse because abusing women directly gets them access to what they want, pussy. Abusing women does not directly get gay men access to straight men’s cocks, so they do it less, and less intensely. If the only way for gay moids to get cock was killing women they would definitely do it, but the world just doesn’t work that way. Gay men are not more moral than straight men, they are just not often put in situations where the investment of abuse is worth the reward. If a gay moid wants to fuck a male child, the only way for him to do so is to abuse said child. The rates of child molestation for homosexual moids match pace if not outpace heterosexual moids.

Gay moids are men who think and act just like men. They aren’t a much of a threat as straight men only because they lack the tools and incentives, but in situations where they can abuse to get what they want, they do it just like straight men do. If all moids were gay, our societies would reflect this behavior. Women would be shamed and belittled but not pursued, more poor scrotes would be sex trafficked, the SA rate of little would exceed that of girls. Is it’s better society? Honestly, yes, if only because less children will be born into it since gay moids don’t want to impregnate women as much as the straight ones do. The dysfunction doesn’t stop, it just gets transferred. I don’t feel honored in being a martyr for male dysfunction so I am neutral. You could walk around at night in public without the fear of getting raped when all men are faggots, at least there’s that.

Anon #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

Most males just ferment into compost instead of cook into a meal.
Create an aggregate example of a male and female human, remove all affectations, shave them bald, and the male will more closely resemble a child than the woman. An out of shape male especially will almost always look more childlike than an out of shape female.

The point of saying this is to demonstrate that male theory often does not align with reality, and the same males who claim that women in general resemble children will simultaneously believe that every individual child more resembles their male parent (even more perplexing that this supposedly applies especially to female children). It’s a paradoxical belief that can be easily explained as the dissonance produced when male subjectivity is incorrectly interpreted as universal objectivity. If evopsych says that children look like males to increase paternal investment and prevent infanticide, evopsych cannot also say women look like children because children make men so aroused they selected for females who look more like children. I could more easily believe the first since there are known mechanisms in place which could produce the effect, but the latter is just an exercise in magical thinking only possible with a piss-poor understanding of how sexual selection functions. More men than not believe their primitive male ancestors had the restraint to keep their dicks in their loincloths because ‘2/10 elbows too pointy’ in order to genetically engineer women of the future to better resemble sexy prepubescents (already an oxymoronic premise), which should further convince you to be skeptical of every claim they make. Everything males say is bullshit, as misogyny takes precedence over the truth. He will argue a logical paradox without taking a single breath in between sentences so long as both statements best follow the misogyny-first-principle. Men get a paranoid thought or dick twitch and call their exhaustive list of rationalizations to justify them science and intellect.

Anon #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

Men are never mad at women for reasons that have nothing to do with being rejected by them. Immediately pursuing porn of them is a form of panicked reassurance seeking - "no no no, this is not really happening! They're not better than me like mommy, they're not above me like mommy, they're not LEAVING like mommy did! See, there's this video of them groveling before me! Okay, I can feel alright for a few hours now!". For a man, a woman rejecting him is wielding dreadful power over him. She is the mommy withholding the nipple, she is killing him. As most things men think and feel after puberty are tainted by their libido (because their sole purpose is dispensing sperm and dying), the "mommy don't leave, I hate you bitch, I will hold my breath until you come back" infantile rage becomes "I will fuck mommy so hard until she's cock-hypnotized into staying because my cock is very magical actually, it's totally not worthless unlike what those Tinder bitches think". Most male fetishes can be traced back this way, they're nothing but sexualized maladaptive coping mechanisms - coping with female withdrawal, coping with powerlessness, coping with sexual expendability, coping with reality itself. Biologically worthless penises become worship-worthy and precious (while still being portrayed as dirty because men can't help but resent women who lower themselves by being with them), biological garbage that is semen is craved like it's ambrosia, women cease being cold and picky like mommy - not only are they eternally available, they actually become this way after being unavailable because the male is just so irresistible - the essence behind all the pathetically wishful "turning a cold bitch into a cock hungry submissive slut" drivel that helps them cope with how women treat them in real life. In that case porn is supposed to be some sort of a reassuring sequel to being told to fuck off by their most recent beta orbiting subject, which requires that initial rejection to be incorporated into the fictional narrative as something that's "overcome" later.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Because women cooperate with men without any rational or utilitarian reason, any woman who chooses to be unconditionally nice to them is (overtly or subconsciously) perceived as a useful idiot/retarded and low value. Understand that it's completely incomprehensible for a male to care for someone on a non-transactional basis - if you choose to do this, you're basically mentally disabled in his eyes, like a human equivalent of a sperm cell giving way to another sperm cell for literally no reason. It's kind of why they berate women for being "irrational" while realizing that they have to be irrational to willingly get involved with men. There are no truly good men, there are bad men who a) can't afford to be openly bad or b) find it more useful to LARP as good at the moment. A male is only as moral as his options allow him to be.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Who socialized women this way?

Females give birth and nurture a helpless undercooked fetus that's only able to communicate via assorted screams. You misinterpreted one screech from it and it dies. How do women instinctively know what the fetus wants despite not looking like the fetus, not being a fetus herself and having no way to determine what it's thinking through conversation?

This is where the empathy gap comes from. Males did not need to evolve the ability to accurately interpret the mental states of anything that doesn't look like them, so they will never have the same level of concern for women as vice versa. That's why the average whiteknight just wants to get laid, whereas the average pickmeisha is mostly stanning dicks because being mean to males is AbStRaCtLy UnFaIr and ReVeRsE SeXiSt. At the lowest level there is definitely some self interest in the form of prosocial approval and signalling her docility, but it's not as straightforward as stone cold opportunism of "pro female" males.

If women had male levels of empathy/theory of mind, men would be routinely killed and maimed for the kind of treatment they subject women to. No man would tolerate this degree of atrocity while whiteknighting and cooing the gender that perpetrates it. What you refer to as "patriarchy" wasn't established through physical force alone.

What are you going to do if your son is a rapist or an incel? 99% of "feminist" women would promptly make an exemption for him despite tweeting #killallmen all day, even if they're radfems.

Anons #sexist lolcow.farm

> All porn serves a dual purpose. Wanking is secondary, the primary one is supplying the moid with maladaptive copes he craves so much. One of them is selling the moid a deluded idea that he's "showing" irl women what they have to "compete" with, that he has "options". It's how they avenge the fact that it's much easier for you to diversify. That's why moids think of ethots and pornstars as actual gfs. No matter how "intelligent", they actually do on some level think that they have a real chance and that's how they get robbed blind. Ethots make moid narcissism and Dunning-Kruger work for them.

If you have ever been in a long term relationship, you have probably noticed that your moid suddenly wants you to dress more conservatively, gets uncomfortable about you speaking to other males and wants you to get pregnant as soon as possible. This is moid "securing" behavior. It doesn't mean that he is serious about you or that he loves you, what it means is that he wants to reduce your number of other readily available options to soothe his inherent anxiety over fidelity. Of course once he achieves this he won't be happy and he will hate you, because moids are generally at their happiest pouring resources into a void, stuck chasing a carrot on a stick forever

> Daily reminder that if you have a scrot, looking like you're ready to cheat on him any minute is how you keep him happy and interested. All men are fidelity-anxious cucks by nature, but their tastes are based entirely on what other men find attractive.

> So in summary the scrots who read lolcow fantasize about us being their unwilling sex partners/gfs

> No, they fantasize about being people. Moids are deeply traumatized by the realization that they are slaves to sexual arousal, it clashes with their grandiose self image. Porn is capitalizing on their petty need to "avenge" that somehow. Like most porn, moid copefics generally revolve around a theme of regaining control/upper hand in response to having a boner and "punishing" whatever it is that made them horny. The moid in question is trying to repair the anal fissure he sustained from having his defense mechanisms ripped to shreds (which no doubt aroused him too)

Anon #psycho #sexist lolcow.farm

image

You can’t explain it, not the profound sadness that most if not all women experience on the basis of being born women and being able to empathize with women. The type of sadness that relates to the assumption (or lack thereof) of a woman’s personhood, freedom, dignity, legitimacy, and autonomy. If seeing women as human, even in theory, may cost him a single orgasm, he will not do it. Nothing relating women will be approached or explored with curiosity or empathy. Only misogyny.(...)

No, men will never understand why women are sad as women. This perspective, if ever presented, simply would not register, and certainly never be seen as a valid assessment according to any value system he deems rational. It will never be anything worthy of a moral repudiation or an emotional response. Never.
They choose instead to believe that women are sad because they weren’t hot and young enough to be sex trafficked themselves. Men can only believe women are sad when men deny them, but the worst, most brutal, most painful, most heartbreaking sadness almost always comes when men pursue them. It’s so utterly backwards it feels like the only thing capable of getting through their skulls is a damn bullet.
I wish a race of aliens came to earth and found these ugly fuckers so valuable, desirable, and indispensable, they abduct, imprison, rape, and an anally impregnate them. They’ll finally be happy living life on “easy mode” by being Glorp’s concubines.

(...)

Moids only use their brain matter to invent novel ways of being retarded. They have given us many new retarded methods to calculate now to best land their squirt in a hole. The only thing men are exceptionally good at is the production of sperm which far exceeds its demand. If you lived on a planet where all of your gametes were special and mattered, you could be milked like a cow too. You can finally find your niche in Glorp’s bed chambers.

Anon #sexist #crackpot #homophobia lolcow.farm

Males are universally (and biologically) more impulsive, prone to wishful judgments, are more likely to act upon them and commit the vast majority of crime in every country for this reason. There is no way that the gender that's celebrated for its impulsivity and violence is also somehow "more rational". All males are already crying faggots because you provide them with care and live at the mercy of their feelings. Males who are physically weaker than women are still as violent as other males, so it's not an issue of body size and opportunity. In the end, the only thing about "socialization" that is constant is that you get all the responsibility, and they get all the power. The school system meme is a boymom and failson delusion that doesn't even need any credible studies - today's mode of learning is objectively more forgiving towards "kinetic learners", "delayed maturity" and other unhinged retardation. In the glorious boys' gymnasiums of the past, boys were beaten and raised in a semi-military hierarchy. Male children perform better in coed environments, while female children perform better in single sex ones, which again suggests that male presence is an unnecessary stressor for girls, likely because males exploit female prosocial tendencies and subconsciously solicit babysitting from them. At this point I should expand on the topic of why gender is already abolished for men, but this post is plenty long.

Tl;dr: do you see how it's not biological essentialism that's the problem, but how it's interpreted and perceived?

Anon #sexist #racist lolcow.farm

Pinkpill here.

Feminism is an inherently western, individualistic, Enlightenment based ideology. I'm going to blow your mind here - technically there can't be any 'nonwhite' feminism because the interests of one's race and tribe are inherently irreconcilable with the interests of women as individuals, because family and all of its surrounding structures innately require female mules. You acknowledge this when you complain about black men/ankhs building black community/identity/self worth on the backs of black women. This isn't a bug, it's a feature. If you want to uplift a nation in any sort of tribal struggle, this is what you have to do. There is no way to support female liberation whilst simultaneously elevating the status of men in your group as compared to men in other groups. In the end you're spending your resources to help advance a man in a male hierarchy. It's unfortunate and I can sympathize with the double bind to an extent, but I have long abandoned the idea that helping women also helps the men (along w with other silly idealistic stuff like 'having it all' and 'teach boys to respecc wamen').

If you're not prepared to be childless/tribeless/identityless and family-less, anything you do will benefit men at your (or other women's) expense.

[...]

Men's issues are not women's issues, but intersectionality aims to obscure that. Being forced to balance the interests of women with the interests of men due to a common group descriptor inevitably results in incidents like not wanting to give up R. Kelly because he's giving more status to the community as a whole. Black men could enslave all white men tomorrow and it would make absolutely 0 difference for black women, except maybe a consolation prize of being sexually valued above white women - a goal that's inherently nonfeminist in the first place.

Anons #sexist lolcow.farm

> Men aren’t fully human. They obsess over specific scenarios of putting their dicks into holes and if they can’t, they become simultaneously catatonic and in a state of psychosis. Imagine living half a century and the only thing you think your existence is worth is a few minutes of hookup sex. I’m so glad I wasn’t born a man nonnies. It’s an existential nightmare imagining yourself as being physically human without a human soul.

> There really is nothing there.

Anonymous #sexist #transphobia #psycho lolcow.farm

I remember arguing with a nonna on here who refused to believe me when I say that males ultimately crave to be raped.

I would even say that misogyny, at its core, is a man’s rebellion over the fact he isn’t worthy of rape, and his jealousy over women because thinks they are.
For troons, the solution is retarded yet fairly straightforward. He becomes rapable by becoming a woman. He becomes worthy. He is more worthy the more he can prove he is rapable, the more he proves he is a woman. Notice how TiMs only complain about being TiMs because when they feel unsexy (unrapable). Notice how TiMs only brag about being TiMs when they feel sexy (rapable). Even when they’re “complaining” about “being rapable” (literally), it’s a point of pride. Humble bragging over being “forced” into sex work and getting “unwanted” chaser attention, giggling and blushing over “validating misogyny” from “TIRMs”. In fact they even invent lies about lesbians and TERFs wanting to rape them, because that’s the best marker of success he can think of.
Moids are driven to create the conditions that best resemble him being raped. Since it’s impossible to command a woman’s will, he can never make her think “I want to rape him”. Typically, he substitutes her want for her need. He forces women to accept his role as “the provider”, and her helpless to resist. He fabricates the conditions required for a woman to depend on him for her survival (staying alive, since he can’t barter with his worthless gametes), where the default is for him to depend on her for his survival (reproduction). She now needs him, instead of him needing her. His power and resources become his coveted fertile womb. He’s necessary. He’s important. He’s so important and so necessary a women would die without him (he’ll make sure of that!)
His insistence that he should be rapable bleeds into all that he believes, or wants to believe. His sense of self, his ego, relies entirely on his ability to trick himself into thinking he is rapable. He wants to feel raped even while he is raping. The woman/child seduced him. She was asking for it. No, demanding it, and since he is helpless to his lust that she controls. She basically raped him.

It all comes down to rape, which is to say, being so necessary and important you inspire a want so commanding that others must take.

Anonymous #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

Do men want to be raped? Absolutely. Do they show it by writing trashy “romance” novels? Not usually. Their expressed desire for becoming rape victims can be literal and obvious, but most of the time, far more subtle and psychological, and it bleeds into almost everything they do or create. Every time man puts pen to paper, when he “expresses” himself, he is crying for rape in some way. Nietzsche’s works are more salacious than anything booktook has to offer when it comes to how much the author suggests a desire to be raped. That’s pretty much all of them.


Anonymous #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

Freud externalized, like all males do. He may have briefly stumbled upon the truth but his ego defenses made him pretzel it into a convoluted cope. His initial work was on CSA and pedophilia, which likely made him unable to separate his observations from his core male self somewhere down the road, this prompting the testerical "NO ACTUALLY ITS THE CHILDREN WHO PROVOKE THEM REEEEEE" pivot he became famous for. Fundamentally, a man cannot face who he is - it hurts too much and "kills" his false self. This is something all the women who believe in changing men need to understand.

A male is incapable of accountability because guilt and self awareness interfere with his most basic evolutionary function - take stupid risks until he either reproduces or dies. That alone requires self deception and grandiose delusions.

You will frequently see shit like serial killers trooning out, pedos age regressing, etc. That is typical male convoluted guilt-dodging - to ward off the realization that he's a piece of shit, he will scrap his prior self entirely and try to become someone else, typically a member of the group he wronged, which is supposed to enhance his delusion of innocence. He, of course, won't stop the behavior he is trying to dodge the guilt of, because he is unable to. He'll just use the mangled split identity to "okay" it to himself while mitigating guilt and shame. This is the kind of deranged mess that happens inside men's minds.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

one could crudely summarize every source of human misery as a byproduct of abstract intelligence - namely, an ape being forced to spectate its own animal nature, in particular the awareness of sex and death. esoteric christfags may begin orgasming about the apple of knowledge symbolism here females, being more robust, default, multi-purpose units, are capable of denying animal nature (such as opting out of sex and pregnancy) to some extent, thus managing at least one terror. males, being built for one purpose alone, can't. a male's life therefore defaults to being forced to spectate his own objectively vile, antisocial sexuality, violence and infinite greed - things he knows to be bad because he'd hate to be on the receiving end of them, things he builds laws around condemning - but being unable to stop himself from acting on them, which causes the male to churn out unfathomable amounts of neurotic cope to resolve the moral conflict. the bulk of humanity's cultural heritage practically oozes with this, most instinctive male politics do as well (the perennial idea that it's the other, differently colored males that do bad, vile male- i mean, SAVAGE AND BRUTISH things), even dumb little memes like "post nut clarity" (the brief moment the ape is rightly appalled by the evil it just fapped to) or realizing that your daughter is about to deal with people like you doing to her what you did to her mother.

imagine being a cancer growth with a brain, knowing that you'll kill yourself if you get what you want, but genuinely having no other means of existing, so you have no choice but to antagonize your host. this is what the "male psyche" is. another, late stage form of their neurosis is a delusional, grandiose fantasy of infinite purity and freedom from desire (easy to find in any religion or monastic practice), which usually follows after they pig out on cake too much.

Anonymous #transphobia #homophobia lolcow.farm

The same reason even cis gay moids sometimes give up and marry their faghags for end of life comfort. A male is parasitic. A femboy and a cis male = two males. A parasite cannot parasitize on a parasite.

Even if you weren't a delusional bricky shim and were actually a young cis woman with a dick looks wise, you are simply not a suitable host. You're a man - psychologically externalizing, unpleasant, aggressive, non-nurturing, egotistical, impulsive and devoid of self awareness - you are not equipped to absorb the impact of another male's incessant testeria. Contrary to what femboys commonly believe, you cannot anticipate another man's needs just because you're a man yourself - no man wants to deal with men's bullshit and that's the reason why there's no worse punishment for a moid than to be confined amongst other moids. It doesn't even need to be mentioned that you're a flagrantly mentally ill man, with levels of batshittery vastly exceeding standard male levels - any real life union between you and another man will blow up in mutual homicidal ideation or bug chasing within months, if not weeks.

Your meek whining on Twitter doesn't mean you're "submissive" (aka caring and self sacrificing) in the sense women are - you're just a weak, petty omega. Cishet moids grow up being coddled, first by their mommies and then by a myriad of women they're surrounded with - they know a man will deck them in the face instead of lovingly tard wrangling them for years. This is why, regrettably, a moid will always choose the ugliest possible cis woman over you.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Moid psychology and their relationships with women all stem from their envy and self hatred. They hate so much that they need us, but they won't let us go. They can never be free and actualized individuals separate from women because they literally can't be. Their egos won't allow it, and even if the could manage it would all be for naught since the parasite will die without a host. Monks dedicate their entire lives freeing themselves from their male obsession they have towards women, and for their efforts they will die alone without any progeny. That's why misogyny always manifests as women being controlled and enslaved, never simply absconded or abandoned (like misandrist are towards men). They need us and they hate that they need us. Deep in the most ancient and primal part of their brain stem is the need for us. They want us to pay for how much they need us, because it's just not fair.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Do not believe anything men say about anything. Fundamentally, the male is a selfish creature whose only sense of right and wrong is entirely informed by “what’s best for me”. At best, he will entertain himself with ideological musings, but will not apply these beliefs to himself if a beneficial opportunity arises that demands his non-compliance (most rape is opportunistic, for example). They have no principles, no sense of morality, just a set of gambits he employs in hopes of getting the most for the least effort. When they play at being arbiters of reasoning and morality, I can only roll my eyes. The sex who must be constantly and continuously instructed and corralled in an attempt to dissuade their rape children, to varying degrees of success, has no business standing on a podium to lecture anyone on what’s good and bad. They obviously lack the hardware required to possess an innate sense of decency, dignity, respect, and excellence. It’s like asking a robot to describe what it means to be human. They can spit out a rehearsed reply, and it may even be agreeable at first glance. But there is no foundation, no substance, no ground in reality, no through-line. Just a calculated output based on what he thinks he should believe, or rather, what he thinks you want to hear. Worse than a robot, who is entirely without motives, the male exercises an attempt to maximize his own benefit, often to the detriment of others. But I digress.
There’s no such thing as a man who believes in something for its own merit. Even if he were cognitively capable of such an abstraction, the benefits of doing so are preemptively trashed as soon as women are involved.

Failure to thrive is so endemic to the male mind, the discard process is mostly unconscious. Pruned, cerebral garbage, flushed down his spinal column to be shit out, and destined to wallow in the eternal sewer that is male potential. Any and all profound male thoughts serve only as heavy slag to fill the bottom of a septic tank, so that his sperm may one day spill over and escape.
If his “moral” argument is reasoned to lead to women’s further accessibility, it’s not “moral” at all, it’s a gambit. He sees a crack in the cement shit drum and scrambles towards the light by dumping more shit.

Anon #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

A moid is just a primitive, defective parasitic machine who wants the world to be free and open for him to indulge. Free and open, but only for him. Because this would never manifest without him first being anointed “god” of reality (the whole universe agrees he is the main character), he is just an angry, confused, ineffective thing. He has to come up with strange coping mechanisms to explain the incongruity between his idea of the universe where he himself is god, and the real universe where he isn’t.
Compartmentalization is one of these copes. Where he rightfully assesses that the outside world constantly denies him, so he makes an “alt” mode in cases where he sees he can take/indulge. When the conditions do not exist for him to successfully benefit from his “alt” mode, it also doesn’t exist. Seeking sex (goon alt), seeking connection (yearn alt). The post nut-clarity phenomenon they speak of demonstrates this very clearly. It’s a total alt shut-down, tied to a very specific material condition (arousal vs refractory period).

Anon #crackpot #sexist lolcow.farm

The moid is a gooner until he is a lovesick yearner. He is never himself, who is both at the same time.
Moids go into like fugue states where they are either porn-manic degenerates or self-pitying “I missed out on highschool love”/“I would marry that cashier and bleed out on the streets for her”. If you catch him fancying either state, he denies the existence of the other. It’s Schrödinger’s moid.
This is why they say retarded shit like “only men are capable of real unconditional love” while also saying the very next day “all men want is sex, they don’t care about women as people”. He may sincerely believe he’s not lying when he does this, because he is cognitively impaired. Part of their brains seem to affectively shut down and reactivate whenever it deems necessary.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

This is why fatherhood is another example of those artificial meme performance niches that men have carved for themselves in order to appear essential. A father isn't actually doing anything important or irreplaceable, but you are tasked with pretending that fatherhood does something sacred. Of course if you ask people to specify what it is, it's always abstract immaterial nonsense like "having a male figure in your life" or "authority". It's never anything with immediately evident utility like cooking, cleaning, providing, caretaking, gestating or nursing.

This is the nature of a male. If he can get away with getting everything and giving nothing, he will do just that. If he can get away with cheating, he will cheat. The only factor he considers is whether he'll get caught and lose his main relationship, nothing else. There is no such thing as a man who goes on a business trip, gets approached by a woman and says "sorry, I'm married".

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Women are not responsible to train worthless sperm wagons to mimic human decency. The best and most moral thing to do when confronted with selfish, exploitative sperm wagons is to just let them wither and die alone. You don’t train a parasite to not be one, you take away its blood supply and let it die. The parasite is gone, and has none to replace it with, making another “responsibility” (burden) for women in the future.

[...]

He’s operating on selfish scrote logic, you and her operating on wishful-thinking mommy logic. Scrote logic trumps your mommy logic because his is the logic of a parasite, and yours is that of a generous host, trying to compel the parasite to kindness by offering your hide. Lmao.

[...]

Jesus Christ, how horrible. Sperm wagons don’t even deserve to be pissed on when they’re on fire. Look at you, both of you, giving him everything. It’s a crime against nature.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Be mindful of male PR and the limitations of your female perspective. You may genuinely be appalled by inequality, but he isn't. A sperm cell doesn't want sexual reproduction to cease, it just wants to get to the egg first. Males are designed for competition and rat racing, it's why they exist.

Any woke male is simply upset that he's not the top dog. Moids are not capable of truly despising hierarchies as a concept, they can only be resentful of their failure to thrive in them. Any 'theory' produced by them is simply an extended rationalization/PR.

Every mama's basement revolutionary wants to be the white capitalist republican pig Chad who gets to reproduce with white bitch Stacy. Because he secretly admires Chad yet desires Stacy, his anger will be reserved for Stacy whom he perceives as reserving her resources for a better male. She symbolizes the fact that he will never advance enough among other males to be selected by her.

In general, anger is a pretty good indicator of desire and deprivation in males. They always hate what they can't have, it's in their nature.

Anon #sexist #transphobia lolcow.farm

Because all men by design have mommy issues, perpetually avenging a trauma inflicted by something known as "maternal omnipotence". All males resent it, but women don't due to their ability to become mothers themselves. Most of what we define as "masculine identity" is just a set of pitiful exercises at establishing oneself outside of mommy's oppressive power. Predictably, everything about this particular LARP revolves around men defining themselves entirely around women and "not being women" as though they ever could be them - another "a-actually I'm choosing this, it's not like I CAN'T do something you can" cope. [...]

You can't help but notice the obvious pussy envy and desire to switch places - males want women to be the easily coomditioned, expendable, sex addicted ones - groveling before the more valuable set of gonads. The ressentiment and envy of a disposable ballsack thus culminates in trooning out. Is it really surprising how obsessed AGPs are with the "mommy" narrative? AGP is the absolute pinnacle of male coping, something that's usually followed by surrender and death.

Males have no sexual fantasies, all they have is predictable eroticized copes. You can coom-meme them into anything including killing themselves, if you push the right buttons. They're not people, they're a malignant growth around their semen pustules.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

[ Refering to Lundy Bancroft's "Why Does He Do That?", a book about tactics used by male abusers ]

lundy bancroft's book is brilliant, but it understandably doesn't explain why in a more global, all-encompassing, elegant sense. his book, as it should have, still left the nebulous possibility of "good men". a proper framework should explain why a value judgment like this cannot apply, that there's only a man that finds it useful or has the capacity to be abusive, and a man that doesn't.

--

their nature innately biases them towards perceiving prosociality/kindness as deference/submission. in a male mind, there's no need to be nice unless you have to be, and that can only happen because you're too weak to just take what you want. no matter how many phony layers of civilization and decorum they slap on top of this, even to the point of losing their own acute awareness of it, it still shines as bright as day and is most noticeable in pre-socialized males (toddler to elementary school age). they absolutely hate dealing with this between themselves of course, but they don't have the capacity to change even for their own sake - let alone women's. for a male, might is right.

ironically, by being staunch blank slatists feminists have lost their only ability to fashion males into the most convincing facsimile of a "good person" possible - removing any and all material power they hold over women would give them a selfish incentive to be nice (display submission).

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

1. What males say they want and what they really want are two really different things. Pickmes never win.

2. Males' stated demands and standards are a) coping mechanisms of an inherently defective individual or b) attempts to dupe you. They know that they're using you and they will despise you for letting yourself be used. They are aware that their sexual role is inherently parasitic and destructive, so they are organically unable to respect women (or other men) who give in to their demands. In mammalian reproduction, sperm is the worthless gamete while the ovum is rich in resources. Due to this, males universally understand being given reproductive opportunity as a form of loss on the giver's part. Any claims otherwise are an attempt to negotiate a better arrangement (in which a male provides nothing in exchange for some abstract immeasurable benefit like "romantic love" while calculating the fuck out of cost/benefit on his end).

Anon #wingnut lolcow.farm

another subject you have been taught your whole life to feel uncomfortable about is fascism, the first political movement in the 20th century to unapologetically demand equal rights for women, female political representation, and the improvement of women’s socio-economical, intellectual and moral condition.
all scares about fascism are pathetic: there is no fascist movement today, because there is no genuine mass-feminist movement today. fascism preaches the subjugation of big businesses under the state, in service of the state, the rules of honor and dignity, and meritocracy, above the rules of money. which party in the world is trying to accomplish this? maybe the CCP if we wanted to be lenient…
there is a strong hunger for “fascism” in most people, even if the word itself is taboo, and this hunger is exploited by politicians and billionaires for their own benefits, without ever even trying to satisfy it, just as there is a true hunger for feminism that no one wants to satisfy.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Most of you need to understand that moid wants are not logical if you zoom out. Moids evolved to have wants that only make sense in the short term because they are disposable. The moid's short term interest is monopolization of mates, and everything that appears to be "reasoning" in a moid is a mere post hoc rationalization of base short term instincts. It doesn't matter if eventually he'll have to resort to inbreeding to keep the guaranteed wives flowing, or that all of his epik chad son lineage will be deformed and uncompetitive in the long run. It doesn't matter that the moid will eventually die in a war as a result of society that he created. Because of lower offspring investment, the long term welfare of said offspring (and by extension society) simply isn't part of the moid's program on a purely biological level.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

There is literally nothing wrong with hypergamy because it serves the interests of children first and foremost. I doubt any of these phalloid entities would want to be fathered by a useless beta male, so why do they wish it upon their own children? It's because what's good for the male is bad for the species. Sexual socialism and deference to males is inherently wrong because it decreases the quality of human race as a whole. In the end, they're expecting you to indulge their "natural" sexual inclinations while yours are to be brutally repressed, which is ordinary male reproductive bargaining disguised as morality.

Anon #sexist #wingnut lolcow.farm

Lul, commies and evopsych.
A woman's "natural urge and desire" is to avoid mating with a stinking beta male. Said stinking beta male is mad about female wage labor because it further obliterates his reproductive chances - in the past he could easily consort with a woman whose only choice was him or poverty, today he's pretty much doomed because even mopping floors at McDonalds is a preferable option.

All males who whine about neoliberalism or capitalism, as a rule, are scorned betas. There is no male "communism" short of Marx himself that isn't transparently rooted in either resentment towards hypergamy or loss of reproductive leverage. By design, males have no concept of equality or reciprocity, and as such their pinko rhetoric always boils down to incel sex- bargaining.

Anon #sexist #psycho lolcow.farm

So… from a biological stand point, why should incels have sex? Why should ugly, misshapen, short, fat, mentally ill men have sex? Nobody wants those kind of genes. Nobody wants to hand down that kind of person to their offspring. There is no reason why those kind of men should even have partners. It happens in nature. The unfit ones that the females aren't interested in enough for whatever reason die off and there's natural selection for you. Incels should just kill themselves.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

> I'm of the opinion that trying to be the bigger person only serves the moids and makes you the ultimate pickme. Only be exclusive when you're getting the best possible deal. If he's cheating, it's perfectly fine for you to cheat too.

While you're out there clinging to the female exclusivity meme, your moid is preparing to install Tinder, Bumble and PlentyOfFish the moment you get pregnant. The money that you faithfully contribute towards his rent goes to Belle Delphine's cuckreon.

> Obviously men are sexually useless, but some women still want PIV so it would be a "benefit" for her I suppose. Obviously anyone can branch out for other things they feel they're missing.

Don't get me wrong, I fully agree that moids are overall not worth your time because nature made it so you only lose by getting involved with them (while moids only gain). In a perfect world, not bothering to tard wrangle them would be the most efficient thing to do.

But most women in the world are straight and still desire male company to some extent, or simply unable to cut contact with all scrots due to circumstances. While there's no way to eliminate these women's losses, they can be somewhat minimized.

Different anons #sexist lolcow.farm

> Beautiful men are a rarity. That's the reality that no one wants to admit. And those rare beautiful men are hated because they show how ugly the average moid is. Masculinity is just ugliness rebranded.

> And here's the part no one is ready for: while the baseline ugliness of males is elevated due to resource coercion, (comparatively) beautiful males would still be a minority due to the fundamental premise of mammalian sexual dimorphism - only a few select males are meant to breed. Long term pair bonding and inclusion of sexually mature males in the family unit are unnatural and harmful to genetic quality in the long run. This is likely a result of adult males adapting to "farm" female maternal attachment to make it encompass themselves.

If resource coercion didn't exist, high mutation rate and innate genetic "defectiveness" of males would probably still produce 90% of (relative) subhumans and 10% of breedables.

> Appearance is the absolute measure of genetic quality, which in turn is a measure of health

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

You know what species of females that almost always gets their way? Birds. Smart, beautiful, majestic, free, social, involved and considerate parents both male and female. Everyone love birds, most not knowing the reason they love birds is because female birds made them lovable. Everyone hates bedbugs. Bedbugs are bedbugs because bedbug moids made them what they are. Moids only know how to breed in hate. Moids make themselves reprehensible, to themselves, to their females, to their offspring, even to other species. Reject male choice TODAY. Deny a male his autonomy TODAY. They will only ever drag you to hell if you do not. Judge and shit test these moids RIGHT NOW. They will turn your granddaughters of the future into bedbugs, and no I am NOT KIDDING. You owe it to your granddaughters. Tolerate no nonsense from these creatures. In fact, make their lives HARDER. You may be anxious at the idea of it after years and years of buckbreaking attempts and propaganda, but it is actually ENJOYABLE to be a bitch for a great cause. Possibly the most enjoyable experience on earth. Be BRAVE and be FREE. Look at this bird. Your granddaughters deserve the life of a bird. If you cannot do it for you, do it for HER.

Anon #sexist #crackpot lolcow.farm

The modern vs past male dichotomy is rooted in romanticized, idealistic, pastoral Disney-trad fantasy that has nothing to do with reality. The percentage of "genius pioneer" males has always been vanishingly small, the amount of degenerates absurdly high, and the "role" males fulfill in society is largely artificial, carved by them to maintain proximity and relevance. Males know that women can do something they can't while the reverse isn't true, so they had to make it "fair" by nurturing the pussy-envy myth of uniquely male ingenuity, the idea that they too can create something the other sex can't, which thus makes them just as irreplaceable and essential.

The modern male is becoming discouraged and catatonic because this artificial niche is dissolving - in the past (after all the role reversal fantasies about women's original sin and inherent sexual degeneracy have fallen flat) he could proudly say "yes, we are responsible for the vast majority of all atrocities and human misery, but at least we invent stuff sometimes, that's the price you have to pay for it because no one else can do it!". Today he has to watch women do everything only he is supposed to be capable of, yet somehow without the "toll" of war and crime. The artificial niche is crumbling, and so the obsolescence panic increases. The male retreats into self destructive hedonism and an ever widening pit of omnipotent desirability fantasies. You have correctly observed that these fantasies grow more pathetic and extreme as males lose their real world "importance", and that is because porn is a cope - sexualized of course, like everything males feel.