(DiamondConfident1811)
I noticed that PC’ers always leave out the life of the fetus in their argumentation. When they are showing the weighted pros and cons they are always trying to leave out the part where they actually kill a living human being.

Until the baby is born, then they supposedly think it’s horrible that the child has to be subjected to this horrible cruel world, and what PC’ers really want to say with those kind of statements is that the fetus should actually be thankful for being killed by their mother.

(Win-Fragrant)
They also never mention the fact that the foetus is actually the child of that woman. I recently debated a PC man whose gf had an abortion and I told him your girl isn’t a potential mother who ended her pregnancy, she’s a mother who killed her unborn child and he was like genetically we were the parents, but not philosophically 💀

(DiamondConfident1811)
There’s a psychological phenomenon that people, who have committed something atrocious, tend to always rationalize the act to themselves so that they are not the bad person in the narrative. And the mind is amazing at this, because if you make yourself the center of the universe, your mind can pretty much rationalize every cruel act in such a way that it’s morally favorable to you.

(Win-Fragrant)
Yes, definitely I knew about that too! It’s crazy the length of absurd arguments that they need to constantly keep coming up with to justify the heinous crimes that they have committed. Because they know deep down once they actually accept what they did and what they ended, know that it was not a parasite, but it was their child, the child who was killed by the only person they were suppose to trust and feel safe with… just the thought of it would drive them into deep guilt.