(The thread itself is disturbing enough, describing a 23 year-old member of “Raping girls is fun” taking a 16 year-old girl’s virginity)
Try to get her pregnant next. Poke some holes in condoms if need be.
Why even ponder all this crap? Rape as a criminal act should be decided upon attacking the property of the father, husband or a pimp. Rape as an act? Who cares, really? Only the moronic cucks in modern Western society think rape should be punished because it violated the consent of the female. Sane societies don't revolve around any consent of the female.
There are some unhealthy patriarchal societies but history has never recorded a society that was both healthy and not patriarchal. It just doesn't happen.
In a healthy patriarchal society fathers own their daughters and marry off their daughters to good men when these women are still virgins and aged about 15-16. Their husbands are then the ones who then become their new owners. Imagine such women to be group 1 for purposes of this post.
In a feminist society this doesn't happen and women become massive sluts even at the age of 13-14. They become completely broken and are no longer even relationship material, let alone marriage material. They are scum of the Earth. Imagine such women to be group 2 for purposes of this post.
Women from group 2 deserve to be raped, but what is more important is that their rapes should remain outside of the realms of law. It should not be prosecuted in any way, much like cats or dogs mating should not be prosecuted.
It's different with group 1. If such women are raped than that should be a crime, but not against the woman but against her owner - ie, father or a husband.
My point being - a sane society differentiates between acts or rape and crimes of rape. These are not the same in a healthy patriarchal society.
Read CoAlpha Reactionary Forum - Obvious facts about rape