[From "A Defense of the trans-Atlantic Slave Trade"]

Before looking at any historical controversy we must ask most importantly, “Who, and why?”
[…]
Africans were not fit for self government,nor were they fit, or capable of the most tawdry of anarchic imitations of civilization. They were, and still are a servile slave race
[…]
To detain the African in war, and ensure his continued compliance through absolute servitude was appropriate for both the African tribes, and the European traders[…]To export them from Africa was to accomplish a wide variety of these goals. It negated, and lessened those who were prone to violence, and unrest within the dregs of African society
[…]
European, and American society utilizing the divine institution of slavery acted as glorious pacifying, civilizing forces for even the most barbarous of the previously war prone Africans
[…]
For all the alleged, and often accurate depictions of the horror of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, Tribal war was often a far bloodier affair than most trips from Africa to other land
[…]
Labor is always necessary but we recognize the unfortunate troubles that so often accompany the common laborer[…]at any moment could be apt to indulge in excess, anti social behavior, or self destructive pursuits, as the pressures of “free society” demands. The trans-Atlantic slave acted as a way to give civilization her labor
[…]
Tthe trans-Atlantic slave trade was not simply moral it was the manifestation of the divine institution of slavery in unprecedented, near perfect form constructing a caste of the conscripted inferior race, and the master race