Roger Marks #fundie

Roger Marks #fundie disqus.com

(commenting on story “Mothers Reveal Pressure to Abort Babies with Down Syndrome”)

Another example of the hateful and appalling attitude of the baby killers who do not give a damn about the rights of the child. As long as they can force their ideology onto as many parents as possible and have as many babies as possible put in the hands of a paid assassin, who cares.

Children are NEVER the problem. The problem are the parents who refuse to accept that they are bringing a new life into the world that deserves the best possible start to their lives.

Not put into the hands of some butcher who will hack them to pieces because they are inconvenient or not perfect.

Abortion is gruesome and heartless and the biggest form of cruelty mankind has ever perpetrated on innocent children. The holocaust pales into insignificant in comparison to the millions of babies slaughtered at the altar of convenience. We jump up and down if someone harms an animal, yet we give our approval to killing a baby.

There is only one word to describe that and it is S-I-C-K.

7 comments

So, you’ll be lining up to abort some of those down syndrome babies, if I read you correctly?

Say you do stop an abortion from happening. May I ask what happens next? Once you have succeeded in your quest to stop the termination of a pregnancy – disregarding the circumstances for why the woman or couple wants to terminate (failed birth control, rape, lack of financial stability, unsuitable environment, domestic violence, mental health issues, lack of employment, medical issues, lack of comprehensive sexual education) – what happens next? Who pays for the prenatal or postnatal care? Surely not a couple working minimum wage who can barely afford their rent. Who provides healthcare and funds medical bills for single women with no place to live? Or a married couple who struggle to afford the children they already have? Who assists the millions of children in foster care still waiting to be adopted? Who helps them when they hit the street at 18 with no money or life skills?

Will you and your ilk - the self-proclaimed “pro-life” community - help to fund comprehensive sexual education for teens? How about access to affordable birth control? Why not promote a vasectomy as a viable option for men who don’t want children? How about funding scientific research so men can have more birth control options than just condoms? If your community is so willing to hold massive demonstrations to oppose a woman’s right to choose what happens to her own body, are you all also going to help pay for healthcare and education costs?

Once you have succeeded in stopping the termination of a pregnancy, what role will you have in ensuring a quality of life for the fetus you so desperately wanted to save?

If Christian News Nazi Network banned you, just re-register with a new name on Disqus.

Sounds like the pro life propaganda bullshit. They don't give a shit about mother or child once born and some in their ranks have been terrorists. They are sick

I can agree with your logic HOWEVER not everyone can provide the best possible start to the child's life. The parents might be drug addicts, have mental issues or just don't have the money to ensure that can receive pre-natal care. And the "pro-life" Republicans are against any kind of handouts or welfare.

Pressured, by whom?

CHILDREN have rights. Children also have a birthdate, they breathe and feel and think.
Embryos don’t have rights, as they are not legally alive. Fetuses have some rights, more and more as the pregnancy progresses, and once they can sustain life outside the womb (week 22 now), they have more rights to that womb than the woman has. Only when the woman’s health is threatened can a pregnancy be terminated after week 21, in most countries (and it’s not called abortion then, but a premature birth).

It’s not an ideology. It’s a human right.

CHILDREN are often a problem. They need food and clothes, which cost money. They need care and training and education, which takes time and effort, and also money. You should be certain that you can provide for a child, before you bring one into the world. With disabled children, extra love and care, training, education and money are going to be necessary, and not all parents feel able to provide that.

An embryo around the time most abortions happen is too small to “hack to pieces”. It’s about the size of a plum.
What you are thinking of is probably “late-term abortion” which is EXTREMELY rare, and only done when there is a serious problem with the fetus, which will kill the woman, the fetus or both. The procedure is done to at least save one of them.

Abortion is like a menstruation or a miscarriage. As embryos don’t have a functioning nervous system, they are not able to feel anything. The cruelty mankind pepetrated on innocent children before abortions were safe and legal, was much more gruesome and heartless. Unmarried pregnant women were sent to nuns in far-away convents to have their children and work off the “debt”, and then forced to leave without the children. The children were either adopted away, starved to death or killed in some more direct fashion.

It’s not just convenience, it’s realizing that you won’t be able to care for a child properly. Many already have as many children as they can properly care for. Then the most humane thing to do is to remove it before it develops a nervous system.

We jump up and down if someone harms a baby too. Quite a few anti-choice people have been found doing just this. Either through abuse, malnourishment, lack of love and affection, or through molestations, refusing to provide proper healthcare or vaccinations. And yes, this is S-I-C-K!

some butcher who will hack them to pieces

The words of a ‘pro-life’ fundie who, if he hears of an abortion being performed in, say, the 9th pregnancy week, imagines an infant who was born 9 weeks ago being literally slaughtered.