RE: American Psychological Association adopts policy in favor of “gender-affirming care” and supporting the delusion of “gender identity”

( Every-Man-His-Own-Football )
I guess there's no better way to keep psychologists employed than to create more "trans kids" = lifelong psychological patients.

( notapatsy )
Here's what I suspect this means for me, a transwidow, if I were to seek out therapy for the trauma I experienced in my marriage (I'm now divorced) when my then husband declared he was "a woman in a man's body" and started acting out objectionable, misogynistic, pornified stereotypes of woman and sucked me into participating in his sexual acting out of them. The therapist will blame me for the breakdown of my marriage and try to re-educate me.

( Persimmon64 )
I love how people cite organizations like this as the word of God, like their opinions are the only ones that matter.

So there are 160 people voting on it. There are over 100,000 psychologists in the U.S.

My brother's friend works as a psychiatrist. He sees quite a few people who call themselves "trans". He says they're all seriously mentally messed up individuals (hence the need for psychiatric care even after they've had this miracle "transition" cure that's supposed to suddenly make them these happy, healthy individuals and make their anxiety and depression/suicidal thoughts disappear like magic. They all have a host of other issues, which of course is why they claim "trans" identities in the first place and which don't go away just because they start injecting themselves with horse piss extract.

( capributterfly )
The fallout from all this is going to be so fun to deal with in the coming decades. Especially for those who are being transed as kids. It does feel good to be on the right side of history but it sucks to know how many will be harmed by all this, who were either minors or had actual serious issues going on and weren’t helped in the way they should have been.

( Women1st )
Think of what the vote would be if they didn’t stack the voting members with TRAs and stifle and cancel researchers that present outcomes that don’t align with the groupthink?