Here is where I disagree with you. Buck Angel is a transman. We can respect that while not denying he is biologically female.

(Antje Galuschka)
why should we use trainslanguage? It's less harmless than most people think. Because when we read "man", our brain associates that it must be a male person. Whether the "man" is preceded by "cis" or "trans" is irrelevant.

How do you fix this cognitive dissonance „he is female“? It‘s an oxymoron.

I don‘t want to validate a GID.

(A. Rashid)
Then you have more in common with transactivists. If a sex offender is a "transwoman", do we need to legitimize that identity? Try to be consistent. Get a solid foundation of gender critical/radical feminism.

(Vanessa Vokey)
I don't respect pornographers. You've been groomed

(Crumbly Duckling)
Alternatively, we can choose not to respect bogus "identities" and childish, made-up language.